The Water–Economy Nexus of Beef Produced from Different Cattle Breeds

The sustainable use of water, or any other natural resource for that matter, is not the only factor that should be considered in terms of sustainability, as social equity and economic prosperity are equally important. The objective of this study was to analyse different breeds of beef cattle, follow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frikkie Alberts Maré
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/18/2513
id doaj-79838a77209c49cc93a8eb1ef0814823
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79838a77209c49cc93a8eb1ef08148232021-09-26T01:38:47ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412021-09-01132513251310.3390/w13182513The Water–Economy Nexus of Beef Produced from Different Cattle BreedsFrikkie Alberts Maré0Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South AfricaThe sustainable use of water, or any other natural resource for that matter, is not the only factor that should be considered in terms of sustainability, as social equity and economic prosperity are equally important. The objective of this study was to analyse different breeds of beef cattle, following the same production method, in terms of their water footprint and economic value addition for different links in the value chain. A bottom-up approach was applied to identify the breed with the best economic water consumption in terms of beef production. The results indicated that the total WF/kg carcass revealed notable differences between the various breeds. The Bonsmara had the smallest WF/kg carcass, while the Limousin had the largest. The WF/kg of beef for the different cuts (rib eye, topside, and flank) showed large variations between the breeds and between the different cuts of beef from the same breed. In terms of the economic water consumption, the Angus consumed between 4% and 25% less water per rand of economic value addition than the Bonsmara, Simmentaler, Simbra, Limousin, Afrikaner, and Brahman. When the economic water consumption of the individual value links was considered, it was found that Bonsmara had the best figures for cow–calf production, while the Limousin and Simmentaler were the best in terms of feedlot finishing and processing, respectively. These contradicting results showed the importance of a bottom-up approach to ensure that the fallacy of division does not occur and, secondly, that possible problem areas in the value chain are identified and addressed separately.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/18/2513water footprinteconomic water consumptioncattle breedsvalue chain analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frikkie Alberts Maré
spellingShingle Frikkie Alberts Maré
The Water–Economy Nexus of Beef Produced from Different Cattle Breeds
Water
water footprint
economic water consumption
cattle breeds
value chain analysis
author_facet Frikkie Alberts Maré
author_sort Frikkie Alberts Maré
title The Water–Economy Nexus of Beef Produced from Different Cattle Breeds
title_short The Water–Economy Nexus of Beef Produced from Different Cattle Breeds
title_full The Water–Economy Nexus of Beef Produced from Different Cattle Breeds
title_fullStr The Water–Economy Nexus of Beef Produced from Different Cattle Breeds
title_full_unstemmed The Water–Economy Nexus of Beef Produced from Different Cattle Breeds
title_sort water–economy nexus of beef produced from different cattle breeds
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2021-09-01
description The sustainable use of water, or any other natural resource for that matter, is not the only factor that should be considered in terms of sustainability, as social equity and economic prosperity are equally important. The objective of this study was to analyse different breeds of beef cattle, following the same production method, in terms of their water footprint and economic value addition for different links in the value chain. A bottom-up approach was applied to identify the breed with the best economic water consumption in terms of beef production. The results indicated that the total WF/kg carcass revealed notable differences between the various breeds. The Bonsmara had the smallest WF/kg carcass, while the Limousin had the largest. The WF/kg of beef for the different cuts (rib eye, topside, and flank) showed large variations between the breeds and between the different cuts of beef from the same breed. In terms of the economic water consumption, the Angus consumed between 4% and 25% less water per rand of economic value addition than the Bonsmara, Simmentaler, Simbra, Limousin, Afrikaner, and Brahman. When the economic water consumption of the individual value links was considered, it was found that Bonsmara had the best figures for cow–calf production, while the Limousin and Simmentaler were the best in terms of feedlot finishing and processing, respectively. These contradicting results showed the importance of a bottom-up approach to ensure that the fallacy of division does not occur and, secondly, that possible problem areas in the value chain are identified and addressed separately.
topic water footprint
economic water consumption
cattle breeds
value chain analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/18/2513
work_keys_str_mv AT frikkiealbertsmare thewatereconomynexusofbeefproducedfromdifferentcattlebreeds
AT frikkiealbertsmare watereconomynexusofbeefproducedfromdifferentcattlebreeds
_version_ 1716868556199559168