An Existence Theorem of Nash Equilibrium in Coq and Isabelle
Nash equilibrium (NE) is a central concept in game theory. Here we prove formally a published theorem on existence of an NE in two proof assistants, Coq and Isabelle: starting from a game with finitely many outcomes, one may derive a game by rewriting each of these outcomes with either of two basic...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Publishing Association
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science |
Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.02096v1 |
id |
doaj-796513759fa340cea322383b2b53ff84 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-796513759fa340cea322383b2b53ff842020-11-25T02:32:45ZengOpen Publishing AssociationElectronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science2075-21802017-09-01256Proc. GandALF 2017466010.4204/EPTCS.256.4:7An Existence Theorem of Nash Equilibrium in Coq and IsabelleStéphane Le Roux0Érik Martin-Dorel1Jan-Georg Smaus2 Université Libre de Bruxelles IRIT, Université de Toulouse IRIT, Université de Toulouse Nash equilibrium (NE) is a central concept in game theory. Here we prove formally a published theorem on existence of an NE in two proof assistants, Coq and Isabelle: starting from a game with finitely many outcomes, one may derive a game by rewriting each of these outcomes with either of two basic outcomes, namely that Player 1 wins or that Player 2 wins. If all ways of deriving such a win/lose game lead to a game where one player has a winning strategy, the original game also has a Nash equilibrium. This article makes three other contributions: first, while the original proof invoked linear extension of strict partial orders, here we avoid it by generalizing the relevant definition. Second, we notice that the theorem also implies the existence of a secure equilibrium, a stronger version of NE that was introduced for model checking. Third, we also notice that the constructive proof of the theorem computes secure equilibria for non-zero-sum priority games (generalizing parity games) in quasi-polynomial time.http://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.02096v1 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stéphane Le Roux Érik Martin-Dorel Jan-Georg Smaus |
spellingShingle |
Stéphane Le Roux Érik Martin-Dorel Jan-Georg Smaus An Existence Theorem of Nash Equilibrium in Coq and Isabelle Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science |
author_facet |
Stéphane Le Roux Érik Martin-Dorel Jan-Georg Smaus |
author_sort |
Stéphane Le Roux |
title |
An Existence Theorem of Nash Equilibrium in Coq and Isabelle |
title_short |
An Existence Theorem of Nash Equilibrium in Coq and Isabelle |
title_full |
An Existence Theorem of Nash Equilibrium in Coq and Isabelle |
title_fullStr |
An Existence Theorem of Nash Equilibrium in Coq and Isabelle |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Existence Theorem of Nash Equilibrium in Coq and Isabelle |
title_sort |
existence theorem of nash equilibrium in coq and isabelle |
publisher |
Open Publishing Association |
series |
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science |
issn |
2075-2180 |
publishDate |
2017-09-01 |
description |
Nash equilibrium (NE) is a central concept in game theory. Here we prove formally a published theorem on existence of an NE in two proof assistants, Coq and Isabelle: starting from a game with finitely many outcomes, one may derive a game by rewriting each of these outcomes with either of two basic outcomes, namely that Player 1 wins or that Player 2 wins. If all ways of deriving such a win/lose game lead to a game where one player has a winning strategy, the original game also has a Nash equilibrium.
This article makes three other contributions: first, while the original proof invoked linear extension of strict partial orders, here we avoid it by generalizing the relevant definition. Second, we notice that the theorem also implies the existence of a secure equilibrium, a stronger version of NE that was introduced for model checking. Third, we also notice that the constructive proof of the theorem computes secure equilibria for non-zero-sum priority games (generalizing parity games) in quasi-polynomial time. |
url |
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.02096v1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephaneleroux anexistencetheoremofnashequilibriumincoqandisabelle AT erikmartindorel anexistencetheoremofnashequilibriumincoqandisabelle AT jangeorgsmaus anexistencetheoremofnashequilibriumincoqandisabelle AT stephaneleroux existencetheoremofnashequilibriumincoqandisabelle AT erikmartindorel existencetheoremofnashequilibriumincoqandisabelle AT jangeorgsmaus existencetheoremofnashequilibriumincoqandisabelle |
_version_ |
1724818019228581888 |