How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach

Abstract Background In the Netherlands, the for-profit sector has gained a substantial share of nursing home care within just a few years. The ethical question that arises from the growth of for-profit care is whether the market logic can be reconciled with the provision of healthcare. This question...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florien M. Kruse, Wieke M. R. Ligtenberg, Anke J. M. Oerlemans, Stef Groenewoud, Patrick P. T. Jeurissen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-11-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05870-7
id doaj-795946c8531e42568473ab4d7be035c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-795946c8531e42568473ab4d7be035c72020-11-25T04:07:18ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632020-11-0120111610.1186/s12913-020-05870-7How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approachFlorien M. Kruse0Wieke M. R. Ligtenberg1Anke J. M. Oerlemans2Stef Groenewoud3Patrick P. T. Jeurissen4Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcareAbstract Background In the Netherlands, the for-profit sector has gained a substantial share of nursing home care within just a few years. The ethical question that arises from the growth of for-profit care is whether the market logic can be reconciled with the provision of healthcare. This question relates to the debate on the Moral Limits of Markets (MLM) and commodification of care. Methods The contribution of this study is twofold. Firstly, we construct a theoretical framework from existing literature; this theoretical framework differentiates four logics: the market, bureaucracy, professionalism, and care. Secondly, we follow an empirical ethics approach; we used three for-profit nursing homes as case studies and conducted qualitative interviews with various stakeholders. Results Four main insights emerge from our empirical study. Firstly, there are many aspects of the care relationship (e.g. care environment, personal relationships, management) and every aspect of the relationship should be considered because the four logics are reconciled differently for each aspect. The environment and conditions of for-profit nursing homes are especially commodified. Secondly, for-profit nursing homes pursue a different professional logic from the traditional, non-profit sector – one which is inspired by the logic of care and which contrasts with bureaucratic logic. However, insofar as professionals in for-profit homes are primarily responsive to residents’ wishes, the market logic also prevails. Thirdly, a multilevel approach is necessary to study the MLM in the care sector since the degree of commodification differs by level. Lastly, it is difficult for the market to engineer social cohesion among the residents of nursing homes. Conclusions The for-profit nursing home sector does embrace the logic of the market but reconciles it with other logics (i.e. logic of care and logic of professionalism). Importantly, for-profit nursing homes have created an environment in which care professionals can provide person-oriented care, thereby reconciling the logic of the market with the logic of care.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05870-7Moral limits of marketsLong-term careCommodificationEmpirical ethics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Florien M. Kruse
Wieke M. R. Ligtenberg
Anke J. M. Oerlemans
Stef Groenewoud
Patrick P. T. Jeurissen
spellingShingle Florien M. Kruse
Wieke M. R. Ligtenberg
Anke J. M. Oerlemans
Stef Groenewoud
Patrick P. T. Jeurissen
How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
BMC Health Services Research
Moral limits of markets
Long-term care
Commodification
Empirical ethics
author_facet Florien M. Kruse
Wieke M. R. Ligtenberg
Anke J. M. Oerlemans
Stef Groenewoud
Patrick P. T. Jeurissen
author_sort Florien M. Kruse
title How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title_short How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title_full How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title_fullStr How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title_full_unstemmed How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title_sort how the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Abstract Background In the Netherlands, the for-profit sector has gained a substantial share of nursing home care within just a few years. The ethical question that arises from the growth of for-profit care is whether the market logic can be reconciled with the provision of healthcare. This question relates to the debate on the Moral Limits of Markets (MLM) and commodification of care. Methods The contribution of this study is twofold. Firstly, we construct a theoretical framework from existing literature; this theoretical framework differentiates four logics: the market, bureaucracy, professionalism, and care. Secondly, we follow an empirical ethics approach; we used three for-profit nursing homes as case studies and conducted qualitative interviews with various stakeholders. Results Four main insights emerge from our empirical study. Firstly, there are many aspects of the care relationship (e.g. care environment, personal relationships, management) and every aspect of the relationship should be considered because the four logics are reconciled differently for each aspect. The environment and conditions of for-profit nursing homes are especially commodified. Secondly, for-profit nursing homes pursue a different professional logic from the traditional, non-profit sector – one which is inspired by the logic of care and which contrasts with bureaucratic logic. However, insofar as professionals in for-profit homes are primarily responsive to residents’ wishes, the market logic also prevails. Thirdly, a multilevel approach is necessary to study the MLM in the care sector since the degree of commodification differs by level. Lastly, it is difficult for the market to engineer social cohesion among the residents of nursing homes. Conclusions The for-profit nursing home sector does embrace the logic of the market but reconciles it with other logics (i.e. logic of care and logic of professionalism). Importantly, for-profit nursing homes have created an environment in which care professionals can provide person-oriented care, thereby reconciling the logic of the market with the logic of care.
topic Moral limits of markets
Long-term care
Commodification
Empirical ethics
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05870-7
work_keys_str_mv AT florienmkruse howthelogicsofthemarketbureaucracyprofessionalismandcarearereconciledinpracticeanempiricalethicsapproach
AT wiekemrligtenberg howthelogicsofthemarketbureaucracyprofessionalismandcarearereconciledinpracticeanempiricalethicsapproach
AT ankejmoerlemans howthelogicsofthemarketbureaucracyprofessionalismandcarearereconciledinpracticeanempiricalethicsapproach
AT stefgroenewoud howthelogicsofthemarketbureaucracyprofessionalismandcarearereconciledinpracticeanempiricalethicsapproach
AT patrickptjeurissen howthelogicsofthemarketbureaucracyprofessionalismandcarearereconciledinpracticeanempiricalethicsapproach
_version_ 1724429325367771136