Implementation and Evaluation of Technology Mentoring Program Developed for Teacher Educators: A 6M-Framework

The purpose of this basic research is to determine the problems experienced in the Technology Mentoring Program (TMP), and the study discusses how these problems affect the process in general. The implementation was carried out with teacher educators in the education faculty. 8 doctorate students (m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Selim Gunuc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hipatia Press 2015-07-01
Series:Qualitative Research in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/qre.2015.1305
id doaj-795661ed54d14bb3b7c265284b0ed401
record_format Article
spelling doaj-795661ed54d14bb3b7c265284b0ed4012020-11-25T01:39:05ZengHipatia PressQualitative Research in Education2014-64182014-64182015-07-014216419110.17583/qre.2015.1305Implementation and Evaluation of Technology Mentoring Program Developed for Teacher Educators: A 6M-FrameworkSelim Gunuc0Yuzuncu Yil UniversityThe purpose of this basic research is to determine the problems experienced in the Technology Mentoring Program (TMP), and the study discusses how these problems affect the process in general. The implementation was carried out with teacher educators in the education faculty. 8 doctorate students (mentors) provided technology mentoring implementation for one academic term to 9 teacher educators (mentees) employed in the Education Faculty. The data were collected via the mentee and the mentor interview form, mentor reflections and organization meeting reflections. As a result, the problems based on the mentor, on the mentee and on the organization/institution were determined. In order to carry out TMP more effectively and successfully, a 6M-framework (Modifying, Meeting, Matching, Managing, Mentoring - Monitoring) was suggested within the scope of this study. It could be stated that fewer problems will be encountered and that the process will be carried out more effectively and successfully when the structure in this framework is taken into consideration.http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/qre.2015.1305technology mentoringmentormenteeteacher educatortechnology integration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Selim Gunuc
spellingShingle Selim Gunuc
Implementation and Evaluation of Technology Mentoring Program Developed for Teacher Educators: A 6M-Framework
Qualitative Research in Education
technology mentoring
mentor
mentee
teacher educator
technology integration
author_facet Selim Gunuc
author_sort Selim Gunuc
title Implementation and Evaluation of Technology Mentoring Program Developed for Teacher Educators: A 6M-Framework
title_short Implementation and Evaluation of Technology Mentoring Program Developed for Teacher Educators: A 6M-Framework
title_full Implementation and Evaluation of Technology Mentoring Program Developed for Teacher Educators: A 6M-Framework
title_fullStr Implementation and Evaluation of Technology Mentoring Program Developed for Teacher Educators: A 6M-Framework
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and Evaluation of Technology Mentoring Program Developed for Teacher Educators: A 6M-Framework
title_sort implementation and evaluation of technology mentoring program developed for teacher educators: a 6m-framework
publisher Hipatia Press
series Qualitative Research in Education
issn 2014-6418
2014-6418
publishDate 2015-07-01
description The purpose of this basic research is to determine the problems experienced in the Technology Mentoring Program (TMP), and the study discusses how these problems affect the process in general. The implementation was carried out with teacher educators in the education faculty. 8 doctorate students (mentors) provided technology mentoring implementation for one academic term to 9 teacher educators (mentees) employed in the Education Faculty. The data were collected via the mentee and the mentor interview form, mentor reflections and organization meeting reflections. As a result, the problems based on the mentor, on the mentee and on the organization/institution were determined. In order to carry out TMP more effectively and successfully, a 6M-framework (Modifying, Meeting, Matching, Managing, Mentoring - Monitoring) was suggested within the scope of this study. It could be stated that fewer problems will be encountered and that the process will be carried out more effectively and successfully when the structure in this framework is taken into consideration.
topic technology mentoring
mentor
mentee
teacher educator
technology integration
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/qre.2015.1305
work_keys_str_mv AT selimgunuc implementationandevaluationoftechnologymentoringprogramdevelopedforteachereducatorsa6mframework
_version_ 1725050424690475008