What Meaning Has in Charge: on Wordsworth, Pound and Prynne

This article is divided into two sections. The shorter first section treats William Wordsworth and Ezra Pound, and focuses upon some of the latter’s numerous oppositions to the theories and practices of the former. It suggests that amongst Pound’s principal criticisms of Wordsworth is what Pound see...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael Kindellan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée 2013-09-01
Series:Études Britanniques Contemporaines
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/ebc/544
id doaj-795553444cb048459af80220b9c2a736
record_format Article
spelling doaj-795553444cb048459af80220b9c2a7362020-11-24T23:52:09ZengPresses Universitaires de la MéditerranéeÉtudes Britanniques Contemporaines1168-49172271-54442013-09-014410.4000/ebc.544What Meaning Has in Charge: on Wordsworth, Pound and PrynneMichael KindellanThis article is divided into two sections. The shorter first section treats William Wordsworth and Ezra Pound, and focuses upon some of the latter’s numerous oppositions to the theories and practices of the former. It suggests that amongst Pound’s principal criticisms of Wordsworth is what Pound sees as Wordsworth’s over-estimation of “meaning” as social convention. The second, longer section, tracks J. H. Prynne’s subsequent objections to Pound’s objections to Wordsworth. The description of Prynne’s possible disagreements looks for evidence firstly within various statements concerning translation (what he says about translation rather than in any translations per se), and secondly in several poems collected in the 1969 collection The White Stones.http://journals.openedition.org/ebc/544
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Kindellan
spellingShingle Michael Kindellan
What Meaning Has in Charge: on Wordsworth, Pound and Prynne
Études Britanniques Contemporaines
author_facet Michael Kindellan
author_sort Michael Kindellan
title What Meaning Has in Charge: on Wordsworth, Pound and Prynne
title_short What Meaning Has in Charge: on Wordsworth, Pound and Prynne
title_full What Meaning Has in Charge: on Wordsworth, Pound and Prynne
title_fullStr What Meaning Has in Charge: on Wordsworth, Pound and Prynne
title_full_unstemmed What Meaning Has in Charge: on Wordsworth, Pound and Prynne
title_sort what meaning has in charge: on wordsworth, pound and prynne
publisher Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée
series Études Britanniques Contemporaines
issn 1168-4917
2271-5444
publishDate 2013-09-01
description This article is divided into two sections. The shorter first section treats William Wordsworth and Ezra Pound, and focuses upon some of the latter’s numerous oppositions to the theories and practices of the former. It suggests that amongst Pound’s principal criticisms of Wordsworth is what Pound sees as Wordsworth’s over-estimation of “meaning” as social convention. The second, longer section, tracks J. H. Prynne’s subsequent objections to Pound’s objections to Wordsworth. The description of Prynne’s possible disagreements looks for evidence firstly within various statements concerning translation (what he says about translation rather than in any translations per se), and secondly in several poems collected in the 1969 collection The White Stones.
url http://journals.openedition.org/ebc/544
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelkindellan whatmeaninghasinchargeonwordsworthpoundandprynne
_version_ 1725474639311798272