Fraktalność Noezy (Fractality of noesis)

Fractality of noesis This paper offers a description of how consciousness appears to itself expressed in terms of concepts from fractal geometry. The phenomenological noesis – here interpreted as the process of consciousness apprehending its own acts – can be considered as fractally paradoxical as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paweł Motyka
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2018-01-01
Series:Analiza i Egzystencja
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wnus.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/881/article/14715/
id doaj-79520f43d50e4bd4a5accefb44331715
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79520f43d50e4bd4a5accefb443317152020-11-24T21:54:25ZdeuWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoAnaliza i Egzystencja 1734-99232300-76212018-01-014410.18276/aie.2018.44-02Fraktalność Noezy (Fractality of noesis)Paweł Motyka0Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział PsychologiiFractality of noesis This paper offers a description of how consciousness appears to itself expressed in terms of concepts from fractal geometry. The phenomenological noesis – here interpreted as the process of consciousness apprehending its own acts – can be considered as fractally paradoxical as it involves the simultaneous expansion of encompassing perspectives (outward in relation to their content: noema) and the recognition of their self-similarity in regard to the horizon of necessarily perpetual and non-total encompassments. The hypothetical perspective from which consciousness could capture its own acts as a finite totality always appears to be equally unreachable. The existential implications of this kind of consciousness-flow condition are elaborated upon by reference to the works of E. Levinas and J.P. Sartre. First, "I" is described as existing in the mode of identifying itself within a diverse stream of contents of consciousness, leaving the absolute alterity (infinity) beyond the scope of its assimilative capacity. Second, being-for-itself – depicted by Sartre as non-self-identical (in contrast to the solid and self-identical being-in-itself) – is shown to reflect some properties of fractals whose fractal-Hausdorff dimension (usually a non-integer value) exceeds their topological dimension. The hermeneutic potential of fractality is argued to follow from its concatenation of three philosophically important categories: difference – corresponding to the continuous transcendence of the current content in noesis; unity – found in the self-resemblance of the encompassing perspectives; and infinity – being a supposed but unreachable state of encompassment of all possible contents (analogous to the hypothetical perception of a fractal as a realized wholeness).https://wnus.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/881/article/14715/consciousnessfractalitynoesisphenomenologyexistentialism
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paweł Motyka
spellingShingle Paweł Motyka
Fraktalność Noezy (Fractality of noesis)
Analiza i Egzystencja
consciousness
fractality
noesis
phenomenology
existentialism
author_facet Paweł Motyka
author_sort Paweł Motyka
title Fraktalność Noezy (Fractality of noesis)
title_short Fraktalność Noezy (Fractality of noesis)
title_full Fraktalność Noezy (Fractality of noesis)
title_fullStr Fraktalność Noezy (Fractality of noesis)
title_full_unstemmed Fraktalność Noezy (Fractality of noesis)
title_sort fraktalność noezy (fractality of noesis)
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
series Analiza i Egzystencja
issn 1734-9923
2300-7621
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Fractality of noesis This paper offers a description of how consciousness appears to itself expressed in terms of concepts from fractal geometry. The phenomenological noesis – here interpreted as the process of consciousness apprehending its own acts – can be considered as fractally paradoxical as it involves the simultaneous expansion of encompassing perspectives (outward in relation to their content: noema) and the recognition of their self-similarity in regard to the horizon of necessarily perpetual and non-total encompassments. The hypothetical perspective from which consciousness could capture its own acts as a finite totality always appears to be equally unreachable. The existential implications of this kind of consciousness-flow condition are elaborated upon by reference to the works of E. Levinas and J.P. Sartre. First, "I" is described as existing in the mode of identifying itself within a diverse stream of contents of consciousness, leaving the absolute alterity (infinity) beyond the scope of its assimilative capacity. Second, being-for-itself – depicted by Sartre as non-self-identical (in contrast to the solid and self-identical being-in-itself) – is shown to reflect some properties of fractals whose fractal-Hausdorff dimension (usually a non-integer value) exceeds their topological dimension. The hermeneutic potential of fractality is argued to follow from its concatenation of three philosophically important categories: difference – corresponding to the continuous transcendence of the current content in noesis; unity – found in the self-resemblance of the encompassing perspectives; and infinity – being a supposed but unreachable state of encompassment of all possible contents (analogous to the hypothetical perception of a fractal as a realized wholeness).
topic consciousness
fractality
noesis
phenomenology
existentialism
url https://wnus.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/881/article/14715/
work_keys_str_mv AT pawełmotyka fraktalnoscnoezyfractalityofnoesis
_version_ 1725867182427996160