Frailty assessment in older urological patients prior to surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion are the recommended treatment for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. This is complex surgery, associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality. Frailty has been shown to be an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Haren, Rajni Lal, David Walker, Rajesh Nair, Judith Partridge, Jugdeep Dhesi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-05-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Urology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287220916614
id doaj-794f1f5cbadb481e83e0239be6d7b709
record_format Article
spelling doaj-794f1f5cbadb481e83e0239be6d7b7092020-11-25T03:03:34ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Urology1756-28802020-05-011210.1177/1756287220916614Frailty assessment in older urological patients prior to surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesisAndrea HarenRajni LalDavid WalkerRajesh NairJudith PartridgeJugdeep DhesiBackground: Radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion are the recommended treatment for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. This is complex surgery, associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality. Frailty has been shown to be an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in several surgical populations. Preoperative assessment of frailty is advocated in current guidelines but is not yet standard clinical practice. Aims: This systematic review and narrative synthesis aims to examine whether patients undergoing RC are assessed for frailty, what tools are used, and whether an association is found between frailty and adverse outcomes in this population. Results: Nine studies, published within the last 4 years, describe the use of tools reporting to measure frailty in the RC population. All demonstrate increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes with higher frailty levels. Only one study used a validated frailty tool. The majority of studies measure frailty using variations on a tool derived from a large database (ACS-NSQIP) effectively counting co-morbidities, rather than assessing the multidomain nature of the frailty syndrome. Conclusion: The recognition of frailty as an important consideration in the perioperative period is welcome. This systematic review and narrative synthesis demonstrates the need for collaboration in research and delivery of clinical care for older surgical patients. Such collaboration may provide clarity regarding terms such as frailty and multimorbidity, preventing the development of assessment tools inaccurately measuring these discreet syndromes interchangeably. More accurate assessment of patients in terms of frailty, multimorbidity and functional status may allow better modification and shared decision making leading to improved postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing RC.https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287220916614
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea Haren
Rajni Lal
David Walker
Rajesh Nair
Judith Partridge
Jugdeep Dhesi
spellingShingle Andrea Haren
Rajni Lal
David Walker
Rajesh Nair
Judith Partridge
Jugdeep Dhesi
Frailty assessment in older urological patients prior to surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Therapeutic Advances in Urology
author_facet Andrea Haren
Rajni Lal
David Walker
Rajesh Nair
Judith Partridge
Jugdeep Dhesi
author_sort Andrea Haren
title Frailty assessment in older urological patients prior to surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_short Frailty assessment in older urological patients prior to surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full Frailty assessment in older urological patients prior to surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_fullStr Frailty assessment in older urological patients prior to surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Frailty assessment in older urological patients prior to surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_sort frailty assessment in older urological patients prior to surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Urology
issn 1756-2880
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion are the recommended treatment for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. This is complex surgery, associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality. Frailty has been shown to be an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in several surgical populations. Preoperative assessment of frailty is advocated in current guidelines but is not yet standard clinical practice. Aims: This systematic review and narrative synthesis aims to examine whether patients undergoing RC are assessed for frailty, what tools are used, and whether an association is found between frailty and adverse outcomes in this population. Results: Nine studies, published within the last 4 years, describe the use of tools reporting to measure frailty in the RC population. All demonstrate increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes with higher frailty levels. Only one study used a validated frailty tool. The majority of studies measure frailty using variations on a tool derived from a large database (ACS-NSQIP) effectively counting co-morbidities, rather than assessing the multidomain nature of the frailty syndrome. Conclusion: The recognition of frailty as an important consideration in the perioperative period is welcome. This systematic review and narrative synthesis demonstrates the need for collaboration in research and delivery of clinical care for older surgical patients. Such collaboration may provide clarity regarding terms such as frailty and multimorbidity, preventing the development of assessment tools inaccurately measuring these discreet syndromes interchangeably. More accurate assessment of patients in terms of frailty, multimorbidity and functional status may allow better modification and shared decision making leading to improved postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing RC.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287220916614
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaharen frailtyassessmentinolderurologicalpatientspriortosurgeryasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT rajnilal frailtyassessmentinolderurologicalpatientspriortosurgeryasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT davidwalker frailtyassessmentinolderurologicalpatientspriortosurgeryasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT rajeshnair frailtyassessmentinolderurologicalpatientspriortosurgeryasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT judithpartridge frailtyassessmentinolderurologicalpatientspriortosurgeryasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT jugdeepdhesi frailtyassessmentinolderurologicalpatientspriortosurgeryasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
_version_ 1724685047882055680