The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference
This paper investigates semantic-pragmatic distinctions in the "acredita isso/acredita nisso" pair of grammatical constructions in Portuguese, fostered by their syntactic differences and licensed by specific discursive contexts. Given the Cognitive Linguistcs’ theoretical framework, repres...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade Federal Fluminense
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Gragoatá |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/36586 |
id |
doaj-79452f0912f2458f88db854f8eb98483 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-79452f0912f2458f88db854f8eb984832020-11-25T01:46:22ZporUniversidade Federal FluminenseGragoatá1413-90732358-41142020-09-01255280983310.22409/gragoata.v25i52.3658620671The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic differenceLuiz Fernando Matos Rocha0Ana Carolina Neves Dias1Karina Carolina Vieira2Joice Carla Ribeiro da Silva3Universidade Federal de Juiz de ForaUniversidade Federal de Juiz de ForaUniversidade Federal de Juiz de ForaUniversidade Federal de Juiz de ForaThis paper investigates semantic-pragmatic distinctions in the "acredita isso/acredita nisso" pair of grammatical constructions in Portuguese, fostered by their syntactic differences and licensed by specific discursive contexts. Given the Cognitive Linguistcs’ theoretical framework, represented here by authors such as Almeida (2010), Croft and Cruse (2004), Ferrari (2011), Goldberg (1995, 2006), Langacker (1999, 2007), Pascual (2014), and Talmy (2000), it postulates that the uses of "acredita isso", common to local counter-expectation contexts, involve a more subjective perspective about the scene evoked, and thus, by triggering the frame of perplexity or admiration, the speaker invokes this to himself rather than the addressee reaction; "acredita nisso", common to experienced counter-expectations and local counterposition contexts, encompasses a more objective perspective on the evoked scene, and by triggering the belief frame, the speaker evokes it for the other. The antecedent term anaphorically taken up by the pronoun “isso” shapes the addressee's conception, in a disjunctive perspective; whereas the antecedent term anaphorically taken up by the pronoun “nisso” shapes the speaker's own conception, in a conjunctive perspective. If the verb "acreditar" falls within the scope of negation, the pronoun “isso” shapes the speaker's own conception, and the pronoun “nisso” shapes the addressee's conception. The hypotheses were raised from data extracted from websites in Portuguese on the internet.https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/36586gramática das construções. fictividade. subjetividade. intersubjetividade. uso. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Luiz Fernando Matos Rocha Ana Carolina Neves Dias Karina Carolina Vieira Joice Carla Ribeiro da Silva |
spellingShingle |
Luiz Fernando Matos Rocha Ana Carolina Neves Dias Karina Carolina Vieira Joice Carla Ribeiro da Silva The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference Gragoatá gramática das construções. fictividade. subjetividade. intersubjetividade. uso. |
author_facet |
Luiz Fernando Matos Rocha Ana Carolina Neves Dias Karina Carolina Vieira Joice Carla Ribeiro da Silva |
author_sort |
Luiz Fernando Matos Rocha |
title |
The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference |
title_short |
The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference |
title_full |
The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference |
title_fullStr |
The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference |
title_full_unstemmed |
The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference |
title_sort |
constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference |
publisher |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
series |
Gragoatá |
issn |
1413-9073 2358-4114 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
This paper investigates semantic-pragmatic distinctions in the "acredita isso/acredita nisso" pair of grammatical constructions in Portuguese, fostered by their syntactic differences and licensed by specific discursive contexts. Given the Cognitive Linguistcs’ theoretical framework, represented here by authors such as Almeida (2010), Croft and Cruse (2004), Ferrari (2011), Goldberg (1995, 2006), Langacker (1999, 2007), Pascual (2014), and Talmy (2000), it postulates that the uses of "acredita isso", common to local counter-expectation contexts, involve a more subjective perspective about the scene evoked, and thus, by triggering the frame of perplexity or admiration, the speaker invokes this to himself rather than the addressee reaction; "acredita nisso", common to experienced counter-expectations and local counterposition contexts, encompasses a more objective perspective on the evoked scene, and by triggering the belief frame, the speaker evokes it for the other. The antecedent term anaphorically taken up by the pronoun “isso” shapes the addressee's conception, in a disjunctive perspective; whereas the antecedent term anaphorically taken up by the pronoun “nisso” shapes the speaker's own conception, in a conjunctive perspective. If the verb "acreditar" falls within the scope of negation, the pronoun “isso” shapes the speaker's own conception, and the pronoun “nisso” shapes the addressee's conception. The hypotheses were raised from data extracted from websites in Portuguese on the internet. |
topic |
gramática das construções. fictividade. subjetividade. intersubjetividade. uso. |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/36586 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT luizfernandomatosrocha theconstructionalpairacreditanissoacreditaissosyntacticdistinctioninuseimpliessemanticpragmaticdifference AT anacarolinanevesdias theconstructionalpairacreditanissoacreditaissosyntacticdistinctioninuseimpliessemanticpragmaticdifference AT karinacarolinavieira theconstructionalpairacreditanissoacreditaissosyntacticdistinctioninuseimpliessemanticpragmaticdifference AT joicecarlaribeirodasilva theconstructionalpairacreditanissoacreditaissosyntacticdistinctioninuseimpliessemanticpragmaticdifference AT luizfernandomatosrocha constructionalpairacreditanissoacreditaissosyntacticdistinctioninuseimpliessemanticpragmaticdifference AT anacarolinanevesdias constructionalpairacreditanissoacreditaissosyntacticdistinctioninuseimpliessemanticpragmaticdifference AT karinacarolinavieira constructionalpairacreditanissoacreditaissosyntacticdistinctioninuseimpliessemanticpragmaticdifference AT joicecarlaribeirodasilva constructionalpairacreditanissoacreditaissosyntacticdistinctioninuseimpliessemanticpragmaticdifference |
_version_ |
1725019804399566848 |