Recognition and Responsibility
While the concept of responsibility is a cornerstone of Christian ethics, recognition theory still lacks a thorough theological–ethical analysis. This essay seeks to fill the gap and develop normative ethics of recognition and responsibility. The first part provides a systematic analysis of the conc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/7/467 |
id |
doaj-793b36c7c73c491dbda14aacfb8c65f1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-793b36c7c73c491dbda14aacfb8c65f12021-07-23T14:03:39ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442021-06-011246746710.3390/rel12070467Recognition and ResponsibilityHille Haker0Department of Theology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USAWhile the concept of responsibility is a cornerstone of Christian ethics, recognition theory still lacks a thorough theological–ethical analysis. This essay seeks to fill the gap and develop normative ethics of recognition and responsibility. The first part provides a systematic analysis of the conceptual elements of recognition, emphasizing the need to focus on misrecognition as a heuristic tool and ethical priority. While recognition coincides with responsivity and attentiveness in the encounter of self and other, responsibility adds to this the moral accountability for acts, practices, structures, and institutions, rendering recognition and responsibility interrelated but also distinct principles of morality. This normative analysis is then correlated to the hermeneutical, narrative ethics of Christian ethics. The founding narrative of biblical ethics, the Cain and Abel narrative in Gen 4, is interpreted as a dialectic of recognition and responsibility. Both exegesis and ethics profit from this interdisciplinary and correlative approach between philosophical and biblical ethics. Finally, the ethics of recognition and responsibility, which emerges from the Frankfurt School critical theory, is confronted with exemplary indigenous approaches focusing on mutual responsibility as the foundation of ecological ethics. Christian ethics of recognition and responsibility resonates with this approach, yet emphasizes the distinctiveness of human interactions and the demands of moral responsibility.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/7/467Christian ethicscritical theorynarrative ethicsrecognitionresponsibilityHonneth |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hille Haker |
spellingShingle |
Hille Haker Recognition and Responsibility Religions Christian ethics critical theory narrative ethics recognition responsibility Honneth |
author_facet |
Hille Haker |
author_sort |
Hille Haker |
title |
Recognition and Responsibility |
title_short |
Recognition and Responsibility |
title_full |
Recognition and Responsibility |
title_fullStr |
Recognition and Responsibility |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recognition and Responsibility |
title_sort |
recognition and responsibility |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Religions |
issn |
2077-1444 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
While the concept of responsibility is a cornerstone of Christian ethics, recognition theory still lacks a thorough theological–ethical analysis. This essay seeks to fill the gap and develop normative ethics of recognition and responsibility. The first part provides a systematic analysis of the conceptual elements of recognition, emphasizing the need to focus on misrecognition as a heuristic tool and ethical priority. While recognition coincides with responsivity and attentiveness in the encounter of self and other, responsibility adds to this the moral accountability for acts, practices, structures, and institutions, rendering recognition and responsibility interrelated but also distinct principles of morality. This normative analysis is then correlated to the hermeneutical, narrative ethics of Christian ethics. The founding narrative of biblical ethics, the Cain and Abel narrative in Gen 4, is interpreted as a dialectic of recognition and responsibility. Both exegesis and ethics profit from this interdisciplinary and correlative approach between philosophical and biblical ethics. Finally, the ethics of recognition and responsibility, which emerges from the Frankfurt School critical theory, is confronted with exemplary indigenous approaches focusing on mutual responsibility as the foundation of ecological ethics. Christian ethics of recognition and responsibility resonates with this approach, yet emphasizes the distinctiveness of human interactions and the demands of moral responsibility. |
topic |
Christian ethics critical theory narrative ethics recognition responsibility Honneth |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/7/467 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hillehaker recognitionandresponsibility |
_version_ |
1721286106140377088 |