Recognition and Responsibility

While the concept of responsibility is a cornerstone of Christian ethics, recognition theory still lacks a thorough theological–ethical analysis. This essay seeks to fill the gap and develop normative ethics of recognition and responsibility. The first part provides a systematic analysis of the conc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hille Haker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/7/467
id doaj-793b36c7c73c491dbda14aacfb8c65f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-793b36c7c73c491dbda14aacfb8c65f12021-07-23T14:03:39ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442021-06-011246746710.3390/rel12070467Recognition and ResponsibilityHille Haker0Department of Theology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USAWhile the concept of responsibility is a cornerstone of Christian ethics, recognition theory still lacks a thorough theological–ethical analysis. This essay seeks to fill the gap and develop normative ethics of recognition and responsibility. The first part provides a systematic analysis of the conceptual elements of recognition, emphasizing the need to focus on misrecognition as a heuristic tool and ethical priority. While recognition coincides with responsivity and attentiveness in the encounter of self and other, responsibility adds to this the moral accountability for acts, practices, structures, and institutions, rendering recognition and responsibility interrelated but also distinct principles of morality. This normative analysis is then correlated to the hermeneutical, narrative ethics of Christian ethics. The founding narrative of biblical ethics, the Cain and Abel narrative in Gen 4, is interpreted as a dialectic of recognition and responsibility. Both exegesis and ethics profit from this interdisciplinary and correlative approach between philosophical and biblical ethics. Finally, the ethics of recognition and responsibility, which emerges from the Frankfurt School critical theory, is confronted with exemplary indigenous approaches focusing on mutual responsibility as the foundation of ecological ethics. Christian ethics of recognition and responsibility resonates with this approach, yet emphasizes the distinctiveness of human interactions and the demands of moral responsibility.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/7/467Christian ethicscritical theorynarrative ethicsrecognitionresponsibilityHonneth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hille Haker
spellingShingle Hille Haker
Recognition and Responsibility
Religions
Christian ethics
critical theory
narrative ethics
recognition
responsibility
Honneth
author_facet Hille Haker
author_sort Hille Haker
title Recognition and Responsibility
title_short Recognition and Responsibility
title_full Recognition and Responsibility
title_fullStr Recognition and Responsibility
title_full_unstemmed Recognition and Responsibility
title_sort recognition and responsibility
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2021-06-01
description While the concept of responsibility is a cornerstone of Christian ethics, recognition theory still lacks a thorough theological–ethical analysis. This essay seeks to fill the gap and develop normative ethics of recognition and responsibility. The first part provides a systematic analysis of the conceptual elements of recognition, emphasizing the need to focus on misrecognition as a heuristic tool and ethical priority. While recognition coincides with responsivity and attentiveness in the encounter of self and other, responsibility adds to this the moral accountability for acts, practices, structures, and institutions, rendering recognition and responsibility interrelated but also distinct principles of morality. This normative analysis is then correlated to the hermeneutical, narrative ethics of Christian ethics. The founding narrative of biblical ethics, the Cain and Abel narrative in Gen 4, is interpreted as a dialectic of recognition and responsibility. Both exegesis and ethics profit from this interdisciplinary and correlative approach between philosophical and biblical ethics. Finally, the ethics of recognition and responsibility, which emerges from the Frankfurt School critical theory, is confronted with exemplary indigenous approaches focusing on mutual responsibility as the foundation of ecological ethics. Christian ethics of recognition and responsibility resonates with this approach, yet emphasizes the distinctiveness of human interactions and the demands of moral responsibility.
topic Christian ethics
critical theory
narrative ethics
recognition
responsibility
Honneth
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/7/467
work_keys_str_mv AT hillehaker recognitionandresponsibility
_version_ 1721286106140377088