RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat
The paper examines stakeholder theory and what it means for CSR research and practices. First, some theoretical and conceptual weaknesses are pinpointed. Then I underline how stakeholder theory is rooted in contractarianism: the firm is viewed as a nexus of contracts between stakeholders, in the lin...
Main Author: | Didier Cazal |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association Recherche & Régulation
2011-06-01
|
Series: | Revue de la Régulation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9173 |
Similar Items
-
RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat CSR and stakeholder theory: the deadlocks of the contract RSE y teoría de las partes que la asumen : los impasses del contraste
by: Didier Cazal
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Quel avenir pour la gestion des parties prenantes?
by: John Boatright
Published: (2006-05-01) -
PRESENTATION POUR UNE LECTURE CRITIQUE DES ETUDES RECENTES SUR LA THEORIE DES PARTIES PRENANTES
by: Younes KOUTAYA, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Philosophical difficulties of stakeholder theory
by: Maciej Soin
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Polanyi contre Freeman
by: Nicolas Postel, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01)