Cluster Analysis of Public Bike Sharing Systems for Categorization

The world population will reach 9.8 billion by 2050, with increased urbanization. Cycling is one of the fastest developing sustainable transport solutions. With the spread of public bike sharing (PBS) systems, it is very important to understand the differences between systems. This article focuses o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamás Mátrai, János Tóth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5501
id doaj-7917f6b8fe3a46be8fe706109c6b372c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7917f6b8fe3a46be8fe706109c6b372c2020-11-25T03:28:20ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-07-01125501550110.3390/su12145501Cluster Analysis of Public Bike Sharing Systems for CategorizationTamás Mátrai0János Tóth1Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Stoczek utca 2, H-1111 Budapest, HungaryDepartment of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Stoczek utca 2, H-1111 Budapest, HungaryThe world population will reach 9.8 billion by 2050, with increased urbanization. Cycling is one of the fastest developing sustainable transport solutions. With the spread of public bike sharing (PBS) systems, it is very important to understand the differences between systems. This article focuses on the clustering of different bike sharing systems around the world. The lack of a comprehensive database about PBS systems in the world does not allow comparing or evaluating them. Therefore, the first step was to gather data about existing systems. The existing systems could be categorized by grouping criterions, and then typical models can be defined. Our assumption was that 90% of the systems could be classified into four clusters. We used clustering techniques and statistical analysis to create these clusters. However, our estimation proved to be too optimistic, therefore, we only used four distinct clusters (public, private, mixed, other) and the results were acceptable. The analysis of the different clusters and the identification of their common features is the next step of this line of research; however, some general characteristics of the proposed clusters are described. The result is a general method that could identify the type of a PBS system.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5501public bike sharingcluster analysiscategorizationdata collection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tamás Mátrai
János Tóth
spellingShingle Tamás Mátrai
János Tóth
Cluster Analysis of Public Bike Sharing Systems for Categorization
Sustainability
public bike sharing
cluster analysis
categorization
data collection
author_facet Tamás Mátrai
János Tóth
author_sort Tamás Mátrai
title Cluster Analysis of Public Bike Sharing Systems for Categorization
title_short Cluster Analysis of Public Bike Sharing Systems for Categorization
title_full Cluster Analysis of Public Bike Sharing Systems for Categorization
title_fullStr Cluster Analysis of Public Bike Sharing Systems for Categorization
title_full_unstemmed Cluster Analysis of Public Bike Sharing Systems for Categorization
title_sort cluster analysis of public bike sharing systems for categorization
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-07-01
description The world population will reach 9.8 billion by 2050, with increased urbanization. Cycling is one of the fastest developing sustainable transport solutions. With the spread of public bike sharing (PBS) systems, it is very important to understand the differences between systems. This article focuses on the clustering of different bike sharing systems around the world. The lack of a comprehensive database about PBS systems in the world does not allow comparing or evaluating them. Therefore, the first step was to gather data about existing systems. The existing systems could be categorized by grouping criterions, and then typical models can be defined. Our assumption was that 90% of the systems could be classified into four clusters. We used clustering techniques and statistical analysis to create these clusters. However, our estimation proved to be too optimistic, therefore, we only used four distinct clusters (public, private, mixed, other) and the results were acceptable. The analysis of the different clusters and the identification of their common features is the next step of this line of research; however, some general characteristics of the proposed clusters are described. The result is a general method that could identify the type of a PBS system.
topic public bike sharing
cluster analysis
categorization
data collection
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5501
work_keys_str_mv AT tamasmatrai clusteranalysisofpublicbikesharingsystemsforcategorization
AT janostoth clusteranalysisofpublicbikesharingsystemsforcategorization
_version_ 1724584882185699328