MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY: A DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR MEDIAL CORD LESIONS

Introduction. Regarding to the absence of doccumented studies concerning medial brachial coetaneous nerve conduction, the present study was conducted to evaluate this parameter as a diagnostic method for injuries to medial cord and lower trunk of brachial plexus.
 Methods. The sensory nerve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B TAVANA, R ROUSHAN PAZHOUH, F REZAEI MOGHADAM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2000-06-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/3512
id doaj-79134ad54a844cf1b1c3524b9d9f8996
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79134ad54a844cf1b1c3524b9d9f89962020-11-24T23:36:47ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362000-06-0152MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY: A DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR MEDIAL CORD LESIONSB TAVANAR ROUSHAN PAZHOUHF REZAEI MOGHADAMIntroduction. Regarding to the absence of doccumented studies concerning medial brachial coetaneous nerve conduction, the present study was conducted to evaluate this parameter as a diagnostic method for injuries to medial cord and lower trunk of brachial plexus.
 Methods. The sensory nerve action potential of median, ulnar and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves were recorded to show these roots (Cs-TV are intact. Then, the medial brachial cutaneous nerve was stimulated on the line that connects axilla to medial epicondyle (parallel with mid axillary line) at the junction site of coracobrachialis muscle to humerus recording was done 2 cm above the medial epicondyle (10 cm under stimulating site).
 Results. In all cases the wave was biphasic with primary negative phase. The latency was 2±0.3 ms-1 (range 1.4-2.6 ms-1) and the amplitude of SNAP was 30±10 mv (range 10-50 mV). The nerve conduction velocity was 61±4 ms-1 (range 53-69 ms-1).
 Discussion. With regard to the intensity and site of stimulation and recording area, this wave is not due to compound nerve action potential of median or ulnar nerve. This study may be useful in evaluation of T1 root and in differential diagnosis of medial cord and lower trunk lesions with ulnar and medial part of median nerve injuries. http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/3512NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY, MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE, MEDIAL CORD, DIAGNOSTIC METHOD
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B TAVANA
R ROUSHAN PAZHOUH
F REZAEI MOGHADAM
spellingShingle B TAVANA
R ROUSHAN PAZHOUH
F REZAEI MOGHADAM
MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY: A DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR MEDIAL CORD LESIONS
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY, MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE, MEDIAL CORD, DIAGNOSTIC METHOD
author_facet B TAVANA
R ROUSHAN PAZHOUH
F REZAEI MOGHADAM
author_sort B TAVANA
title MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY: A DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR MEDIAL CORD LESIONS
title_short MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY: A DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR MEDIAL CORD LESIONS
title_full MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY: A DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR MEDIAL CORD LESIONS
title_fullStr MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY: A DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR MEDIAL CORD LESIONS
title_full_unstemmed MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY: A DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR MEDIAL CORD LESIONS
title_sort medial brachial cutaneous nerve conduction velocity: a diagnostic method for medial cord lesions
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
publishDate 2000-06-01
description Introduction. Regarding to the absence of doccumented studies concerning medial brachial coetaneous nerve conduction, the present study was conducted to evaluate this parameter as a diagnostic method for injuries to medial cord and lower trunk of brachial plexus.
 Methods. The sensory nerve action potential of median, ulnar and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves were recorded to show these roots (Cs-TV are intact. Then, the medial brachial cutaneous nerve was stimulated on the line that connects axilla to medial epicondyle (parallel with mid axillary line) at the junction site of coracobrachialis muscle to humerus recording was done 2 cm above the medial epicondyle (10 cm under stimulating site).
 Results. In all cases the wave was biphasic with primary negative phase. The latency was 2±0.3 ms-1 (range 1.4-2.6 ms-1) and the amplitude of SNAP was 30±10 mv (range 10-50 mV). The nerve conduction velocity was 61±4 ms-1 (range 53-69 ms-1).
 Discussion. With regard to the intensity and site of stimulation and recording area, this wave is not due to compound nerve action potential of median or ulnar nerve. This study may be useful in evaluation of T1 root and in differential diagnosis of medial cord and lower trunk lesions with ulnar and medial part of median nerve injuries.
topic NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY, MEDIAL BRACHIAL CUTANEOUS NERVE, MEDIAL CORD, DIAGNOSTIC METHOD
url http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/3512
work_keys_str_mv AT btavana medialbrachialcutaneousnerveconductionvelocityadiagnosticmethodformedialcordlesions
AT rroushanpazhouh medialbrachialcutaneousnerveconductionvelocityadiagnosticmethodformedialcordlesions
AT frezaeimoghadam medialbrachialcutaneousnerveconductionvelocityadiagnosticmethodformedialcordlesions
_version_ 1725521649453760512