Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle

Abstract Objective The purpose of the present paper is to compare the equivalence of the measurement of the alpha angle using the Ducroquet and cross-table lateral views. Methods We have recruited 90 patients, resulting in 95 hips. We have standardized the realization of the radiographic views....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello, Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz, Walter Ricioli Junior, Marco Rudelli, Marcus Aurelius Araújo Nunes, Denise Tokechi Amaral
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
Series:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000400428&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-78edffc5672749df842a1a2a87b45e2b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78edffc5672749df842a1a2a87b45e2b2020-11-25T01:25:35ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia1982-437854442843310.1055/s-0039-1693044S0102-36162019000400428Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha AngleGiancarlo Cavalli PoleselloMarcelo Cavalheiro QueirozWalter Ricioli JuniorMarco RudelliMarcus Aurelius Araújo NunesDenise Tokechi AmaralAbstract Objective The purpose of the present paper is to compare the equivalence of the measurement of the alpha angle using the Ducroquet and cross-table lateral views. Methods We have recruited 90 patients, resulting in 95 hips. We have standardized the realization of the radiographic views. The incidence of the lateral cross-table views were takenwith 15° of internal rotation with the patient in the supine position, and the incidence of the Ducroquet viewswas standardizedwith the patient in the supine position,with 90° of flexion and 45° of abduction of the hip. The alpha angle wasmeasured in both lateral views, by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The measurements were performed in 2 different times: an initial evaluation andanother 4weeks afterwards. The t Student test was usedand calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results We have found a good intraobserver correlation for both views in different times; there was no statistically significant difference between the measurements performed by the two views. However, the interobserver correlation was low. Conclusion In conclusion, the Ducroquet profile view is a good choice for the α angle measurement and can be used instead of the cross-table view.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000400428&lng=en&tlng=enfemoroacetabular impingementhip/abnormalitieship/diagnostic imagingradiography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello
Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz
Walter Ricioli Junior
Marco Rudelli
Marcus Aurelius Araújo Nunes
Denise Tokechi Amaral
spellingShingle Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello
Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz
Walter Ricioli Junior
Marco Rudelli
Marcus Aurelius Araújo Nunes
Denise Tokechi Amaral
Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
femoroacetabular impingement
hip/abnormalities
hip/diagnostic imaging
radiography
author_facet Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello
Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz
Walter Ricioli Junior
Marco Rudelli
Marcus Aurelius Araújo Nunes
Denise Tokechi Amaral
author_sort Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello
title Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle
title_sort comparative evaluation of cross-table and ducroquet incidences for measurement of the hip alpha angle
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
series Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
issn 1982-4378
description Abstract Objective The purpose of the present paper is to compare the equivalence of the measurement of the alpha angle using the Ducroquet and cross-table lateral views. Methods We have recruited 90 patients, resulting in 95 hips. We have standardized the realization of the radiographic views. The incidence of the lateral cross-table views were takenwith 15° of internal rotation with the patient in the supine position, and the incidence of the Ducroquet viewswas standardizedwith the patient in the supine position,with 90° of flexion and 45° of abduction of the hip. The alpha angle wasmeasured in both lateral views, by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The measurements were performed in 2 different times: an initial evaluation andanother 4weeks afterwards. The t Student test was usedand calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results We have found a good intraobserver correlation for both views in different times; there was no statistically significant difference between the measurements performed by the two views. However, the interobserver correlation was low. Conclusion In conclusion, the Ducroquet profile view is a good choice for the α angle measurement and can be used instead of the cross-table view.
topic femoroacetabular impingement
hip/abnormalities
hip/diagnostic imaging
radiography
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000400428&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT giancarlocavallipolesello comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle
AT marcelocavalheiroqueiroz comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle
AT walterriciolijunior comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle
AT marcorudelli comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle
AT marcusaureliusaraujonunes comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle
AT denisetokechiamaral comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle
_version_ 1725113160891891712