Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle
Abstract Objective The purpose of the present paper is to compare the equivalence of the measurement of the alpha angle using the Ducroquet and cross-table lateral views. Methods We have recruited 90 patients, resulting in 95 hips. We have standardized the realization of the radiographic views....
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000400428&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-78edffc5672749df842a1a2a87b45e2b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-78edffc5672749df842a1a2a87b45e2b2020-11-25T01:25:35ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia1982-437854442843310.1055/s-0039-1693044S0102-36162019000400428Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha AngleGiancarlo Cavalli PoleselloMarcelo Cavalheiro QueirozWalter Ricioli JuniorMarco RudelliMarcus Aurelius Araújo NunesDenise Tokechi AmaralAbstract Objective The purpose of the present paper is to compare the equivalence of the measurement of the alpha angle using the Ducroquet and cross-table lateral views. Methods We have recruited 90 patients, resulting in 95 hips. We have standardized the realization of the radiographic views. The incidence of the lateral cross-table views were takenwith 15° of internal rotation with the patient in the supine position, and the incidence of the Ducroquet viewswas standardizedwith the patient in the supine position,with 90° of flexion and 45° of abduction of the hip. The alpha angle wasmeasured in both lateral views, by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The measurements were performed in 2 different times: an initial evaluation andanother 4weeks afterwards. The t Student test was usedand calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results We have found a good intraobserver correlation for both views in different times; there was no statistically significant difference between the measurements performed by the two views. However, the interobserver correlation was low. Conclusion In conclusion, the Ducroquet profile view is a good choice for the α angle measurement and can be used instead of the cross-table view.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000400428&lng=en&tlng=enfemoroacetabular impingementhip/abnormalitieship/diagnostic imagingradiography |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz Walter Ricioli Junior Marco Rudelli Marcus Aurelius Araújo Nunes Denise Tokechi Amaral |
spellingShingle |
Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz Walter Ricioli Junior Marco Rudelli Marcus Aurelius Araújo Nunes Denise Tokechi Amaral Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia femoroacetabular impingement hip/abnormalities hip/diagnostic imaging radiography |
author_facet |
Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz Walter Ricioli Junior Marco Rudelli Marcus Aurelius Araújo Nunes Denise Tokechi Amaral |
author_sort |
Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello |
title |
Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle |
title_short |
Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle |
title_full |
Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle |
title_fullStr |
Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Evaluation of Cross-table and Ducroquet Incidences for Measurement of the Hip Alpha Angle |
title_sort |
comparative evaluation of cross-table and ducroquet incidences for measurement of the hip alpha angle |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
series |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia |
issn |
1982-4378 |
description |
Abstract Objective The purpose of the present paper is to compare the equivalence of the measurement of the alpha angle using the Ducroquet and cross-table lateral views. Methods We have recruited 90 patients, resulting in 95 hips. We have standardized the realization of the radiographic views. The incidence of the lateral cross-table views were takenwith 15° of internal rotation with the patient in the supine position, and the incidence of the Ducroquet viewswas standardizedwith the patient in the supine position,with 90° of flexion and 45° of abduction of the hip. The alpha angle wasmeasured in both lateral views, by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The measurements were performed in 2 different times: an initial evaluation andanother 4weeks afterwards. The t Student test was usedand calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results We have found a good intraobserver correlation for both views in different times; there was no statistically significant difference between the measurements performed by the two views. However, the interobserver correlation was low. Conclusion In conclusion, the Ducroquet profile view is a good choice for the α angle measurement and can be used instead of the cross-table view. |
topic |
femoroacetabular impingement hip/abnormalities hip/diagnostic imaging radiography |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162019000400428&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giancarlocavallipolesello comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle AT marcelocavalheiroqueiroz comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle AT walterriciolijunior comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle AT marcorudelli comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle AT marcusaureliusaraujonunes comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle AT denisetokechiamaral comparativeevaluationofcrosstableandducroquetincidencesformeasurementofthehipalphaangle |
_version_ |
1725113160891891712 |