INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT

The article analyzes the existing approaches and methods to assess the effectiveness of public management in the world practice. The quality management model Common Assessment Framework (CAF) and the Russian EPUS (Effective Public Service) created on its basis are analyzed, advantages and disadvan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Пивоварова Ольга Владимировна
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Южно-Российский институт управления - филиал РАНХиГС 2020-06-01
Series:Государственное и муниципальное управление
Subjects:
caf
Online Access:http://upravlenie.uriu.ranepa.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/80-86-1.pdf
id doaj-78ec7d927b964ec3b0feab694b4badf3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78ec7d927b964ec3b0feab694b4badf32020-11-25T03:01:48ZrusЮжно-Российский институт управления - филиал РАНХиГС Государственное и муниципальное управление2079-16902020-06-012020/22808610.22394/2079-1690-2020-1-2-80-86INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENTПивоварова Ольга Владимировна0Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской ФедерацииThe article analyzes the existing approaches and methods to assess the effectiveness of public management in the world practice. The quality management model Common Assessment Framework (CAF) and the Russian EPUS (Effective Public Service) created on its basis are analyzed, advantages and disadvantages, prerequisites necessary for the successful implementation of these models in Russian realities are highlighted. The integral Governance research indicator country snapshot (GRICS) and its components are considered, the graphical analysis of the Russian Federation's position in this rating in 2002-2018 are conducted. The features of the assessment of the Opacity index and the Public Integrity Index are investigated. The key disadvantages of methods for assessing the effectiveness of public management are justified and highlighted: ambiguous nature and complexity of measurement due to the lack of information base of the indicators used, internal unavailability of the public management system and subjective approach to the assessment.http://upravlenie.uriu.ranepa.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/80-86-1.pdfpublic managementefficiency assessmentinternational experiencemethodsindicatorsquality managementcafepusgricsopacity indexpublic integrity index.
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Пивоварова Ольга Владимировна
spellingShingle Пивоварова Ольга Владимировна
INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Государственное и муниципальное управление
public management
efficiency assessment
international experience
methods
indicators
quality management
caf
epus
grics
opacity index
public integrity index.
author_facet Пивоварова Ольга Владимировна
author_sort Пивоварова Ольга Владимировна
title INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
title_short INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
title_full INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
title_fullStr INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
title_full_unstemmed INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
title_sort international experience of assessing the effectiveness of public management
publisher Южно-Российский институт управления - филиал РАНХиГС
series Государственное и муниципальное управление
issn 2079-1690
publishDate 2020-06-01
description The article analyzes the existing approaches and methods to assess the effectiveness of public management in the world practice. The quality management model Common Assessment Framework (CAF) and the Russian EPUS (Effective Public Service) created on its basis are analyzed, advantages and disadvantages, prerequisites necessary for the successful implementation of these models in Russian realities are highlighted. The integral Governance research indicator country snapshot (GRICS) and its components are considered, the graphical analysis of the Russian Federation's position in this rating in 2002-2018 are conducted. The features of the assessment of the Opacity index and the Public Integrity Index are investigated. The key disadvantages of methods for assessing the effectiveness of public management are justified and highlighted: ambiguous nature and complexity of measurement due to the lack of information base of the indicators used, internal unavailability of the public management system and subjective approach to the assessment.
topic public management
efficiency assessment
international experience
methods
indicators
quality management
caf
epus
grics
opacity index
public integrity index.
url http://upravlenie.uriu.ranepa.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/80-86-1.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pivovarovaolʹgavladimirovna internationalexperienceofassessingtheeffectivenessofpublicmanagement
_version_ 1724691820108054528