Should patients set the agenda for informed, consent? A prospective survey of desire for information and discussion prior to routine cataract surgery

Lee Teak Tan1,2, Huw Jenkins1,2, John Roberts-Harry2, Michael Austin11Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK; 2West Wales General Hospital, Carmarthen, UKPurpose: To ascertain the level of information relating to specific risks desired by patients prior to cataract surgery.Setting: Dedicated cataract surge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee Teak Tan, Huw Jenkins, John Roberts-Harry, Michael Austin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2008-08-01
Series:Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/should-patients-set-the-agenda-for-informed-consent-a-prospective-surv-a2031
id doaj-78e7a5f58e3148e782c1819d679c744b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78e7a5f58e3148e782c1819d679c744b2020-11-25T00:41:16ZengDove Medical PressTherapeutics and Clinical Risk Management1176-63361178-203X2008-08-012008Issue 511191125Should patients set the agenda for informed, consent? A prospective survey of desire for information and discussion prior to routine cataract surgeryLee Teak TanHuw JenkinsJohn Roberts-HarryMichael AustinLee Teak Tan1,2, Huw Jenkins1,2, John Roberts-Harry2, Michael Austin11Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK; 2West Wales General Hospital, Carmarthen, UKPurpose: To ascertain the level of information relating to specific risks desired by patients prior to cataract surgery.Setting: Dedicated cataract surgery pre-assessment clinics of 2 hospitals in South West Wales, UK.Methods: Consecutive patients (106) were recruited prospectively. Of these, 6 were formally excluded due to deafness or disorientation. Eligible patients (100) were asked a set of preliminary questions to determine their understanding of the nature of cataract, risk perception, and level of information felt necessary prior to giving consent. Those who desired further information were guided through a standardized questionnaire, which included an audio-visual presentation giving information relating to each potential surgical complication, allowing patients to rate them for relevance to their giving of informed consent.Results: Of the entire group of 100, 32 did not wish to know “anything at all” about risks and would prefer to leave decision making to their ophthalmologist; 22 were interested only in knowing their overall chance of visual improvement; and 46 welcomed a general discussion of possible complications, of whom 25 went on to enquire about specific complications. Of these 25, 18 wished to be informed of posterior capsular (PC) tearing, 17 of endophthalmitis, 16 each of dropped lens, retinal detachment and corneal clouding, and 15 of bleeding, sympathetic ophthalmia, and PC opacification.Conclusion: Patients differ in their desire for information prior to cataract surgery, with one significant minority favoring little or no discussion of risk and another wishing detailed consideration of specific risks. A system of consent where patients have a choice as to the level of discussion undertaken may better suit patients’ wishes than a doctor-specified agenda.Keywords: cataract extraction, informed consent, patient-centered care http://www.dovepress.com/should-patients-set-the-agenda-for-informed-consent-a-prospective-surv-a2031
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lee Teak Tan
Huw Jenkins
John Roberts-Harry
Michael Austin
spellingShingle Lee Teak Tan
Huw Jenkins
John Roberts-Harry
Michael Austin
Should patients set the agenda for informed, consent? A prospective survey of desire for information and discussion prior to routine cataract surgery
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
author_facet Lee Teak Tan
Huw Jenkins
John Roberts-Harry
Michael Austin
author_sort Lee Teak Tan
title Should patients set the agenda for informed, consent? A prospective survey of desire for information and discussion prior to routine cataract surgery
title_short Should patients set the agenda for informed, consent? A prospective survey of desire for information and discussion prior to routine cataract surgery
title_full Should patients set the agenda for informed, consent? A prospective survey of desire for information and discussion prior to routine cataract surgery
title_fullStr Should patients set the agenda for informed, consent? A prospective survey of desire for information and discussion prior to routine cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed Should patients set the agenda for informed, consent? A prospective survey of desire for information and discussion prior to routine cataract surgery
title_sort should patients set the agenda for informed, consent? a prospective survey of desire for information and discussion prior to routine cataract surgery
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
issn 1176-6336
1178-203X
publishDate 2008-08-01
description Lee Teak Tan1,2, Huw Jenkins1,2, John Roberts-Harry2, Michael Austin11Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK; 2West Wales General Hospital, Carmarthen, UKPurpose: To ascertain the level of information relating to specific risks desired by patients prior to cataract surgery.Setting: Dedicated cataract surgery pre-assessment clinics of 2 hospitals in South West Wales, UK.Methods: Consecutive patients (106) were recruited prospectively. Of these, 6 were formally excluded due to deafness or disorientation. Eligible patients (100) were asked a set of preliminary questions to determine their understanding of the nature of cataract, risk perception, and level of information felt necessary prior to giving consent. Those who desired further information were guided through a standardized questionnaire, which included an audio-visual presentation giving information relating to each potential surgical complication, allowing patients to rate them for relevance to their giving of informed consent.Results: Of the entire group of 100, 32 did not wish to know “anything at all” about risks and would prefer to leave decision making to their ophthalmologist; 22 were interested only in knowing their overall chance of visual improvement; and 46 welcomed a general discussion of possible complications, of whom 25 went on to enquire about specific complications. Of these 25, 18 wished to be informed of posterior capsular (PC) tearing, 17 of endophthalmitis, 16 each of dropped lens, retinal detachment and corneal clouding, and 15 of bleeding, sympathetic ophthalmia, and PC opacification.Conclusion: Patients differ in their desire for information prior to cataract surgery, with one significant minority favoring little or no discussion of risk and another wishing detailed consideration of specific risks. A system of consent where patients have a choice as to the level of discussion undertaken may better suit patients’ wishes than a doctor-specified agenda.Keywords: cataract extraction, informed consent, patient-centered care
url http://www.dovepress.com/should-patients-set-the-agenda-for-informed-consent-a-prospective-surv-a2031
work_keys_str_mv AT leeteaktan shouldpatientssettheagendaforinformedconsentaprospectivesurveyofdesireforinformationanddiscussionpriortoroutinecataractsurgery
AT huwjenkins shouldpatientssettheagendaforinformedconsentaprospectivesurveyofdesireforinformationanddiscussionpriortoroutinecataractsurgery
AT johnrobertsharry shouldpatientssettheagendaforinformedconsentaprospectivesurveyofdesireforinformationanddiscussionpriortoroutinecataractsurgery
AT michaelaustin shouldpatientssettheagendaforinformedconsentaprospectivesurveyofdesireforinformationanddiscussionpriortoroutinecataractsurgery
_version_ 1716128932679385088