A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.

Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized control...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John A Cunningham, David C Hodgins, Tony Toneatto, Michelle Murphy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3279405?pdf=render
id doaj-78dc041d700247c6bc8c7cd7ae7ba903
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78dc041d700247c6bc8c7cd7ae7ba9032020-11-25T01:30:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0172e3158610.1371/journal.pone.0031586A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.John A CunninghamDavid C HodginsTony ToneattoMichelle MurphyPersonalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers.Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up.The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.ClinicalTrials.govNCT00578357.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3279405?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John A Cunningham
David C Hodgins
Tony Toneatto
Michelle Murphy
spellingShingle John A Cunningham
David C Hodgins
Tony Toneatto
Michelle Murphy
A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.
PLoS ONE
author_facet John A Cunningham
David C Hodgins
Tony Toneatto
Michelle Murphy
author_sort John A Cunningham
title A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.
title_short A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.
title_full A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.
title_sort randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers.Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up.The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.ClinicalTrials.govNCT00578357.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3279405?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT johnacunningham arandomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT davidchodgins arandomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT tonytoneatto arandomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT michellemurphy arandomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT johnacunningham randomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT davidchodgins randomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT tonytoneatto randomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT michellemurphy randomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
_version_ 1725088617835003904