Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents
Numerous questions surround the nature of reward processing in the developing adolescent brain, particularly in regard to polysubstance use. We therefore sought to examine incentive-elicited brain activation in the context of three common substances of abuse (cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol). Due to...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929315000523 |
id |
doaj-78cf7b0012a4498fb1b9b9753f0d8b4d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-78cf7b0012a4498fb1b9b9753f0d8b4d2020-11-24T23:32:02ZengElsevierDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience1878-92931878-93072015-12-0116C51510.1016/j.dcn.2015.05.005Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescentsHollis C. Karoly0Angela D. Bryan1Barbara J. Weiland2Andrew Mayer3Andrew Dodd4Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing5University of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USAUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USAUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USAThe Mind Research Network/LBERI, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USAThe Mind Research Network/LBERI, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USADepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USANumerous questions surround the nature of reward processing in the developing adolescent brain, particularly in regard to polysubstance use. We therefore sought to examine incentive-elicited brain activation in the context of three common substances of abuse (cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol). Due to the role of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in incentive processing, we compared activation in this region during anticipation of reward and loss using a monetary incentive delay (MID) task. Adolescents (ages 14–18; 66% male) were matched on age, gender, and frequency of use of any common substances within six distinct groups: cannabis-only (n = 14), tobacco-only (n = 34), alcohol-only (n = 12), cannabis + tobacco (n = 17), cannabis + tobacco + alcohol (n = 17), and non-using controls (n = 38). All groups showed comparable behavioral performance on the MID task. The tobacco-only group showed decreased bilateral nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activation during reward anticipation as compared to the alcohol-only group, the control group, and both polysubstance groups. Interestingly, no differences emerged between the cannabis-only group and any of the other groups. Results from this study suggest that youth who tend toward single-substance tobacco use may possess behavioral and/or neurobiological characteristics that differentiate them from both their substance-using and non-substance-using peers.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929315000523AdolescentCannabisTobaccofMRIMonetary incentive delay |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hollis C. Karoly Angela D. Bryan Barbara J. Weiland Andrew Mayer Andrew Dodd Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing |
spellingShingle |
Hollis C. Karoly Angela D. Bryan Barbara J. Weiland Andrew Mayer Andrew Dodd Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Adolescent Cannabis Tobacco fMRI Monetary incentive delay |
author_facet |
Hollis C. Karoly Angela D. Bryan Barbara J. Weiland Andrew Mayer Andrew Dodd Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing |
author_sort |
Hollis C. Karoly |
title |
Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title_short |
Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title_full |
Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title_fullStr |
Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents |
title_sort |
does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? an examination with adolescents |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience |
issn |
1878-9293 1878-9307 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
Numerous questions surround the nature of reward processing in the developing adolescent brain, particularly in regard to polysubstance use. We therefore sought to examine incentive-elicited brain activation in the context of three common substances of abuse (cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol). Due to the role of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in incentive processing, we compared activation in this region during anticipation of reward and loss using a monetary incentive delay (MID) task. Adolescents (ages 14–18; 66% male) were matched on age, gender, and frequency of use of any common substances within six distinct groups: cannabis-only (n = 14), tobacco-only (n = 34), alcohol-only (n = 12), cannabis + tobacco (n = 17), cannabis + tobacco + alcohol (n = 17), and non-using controls (n = 38). All groups showed comparable behavioral performance on the MID task. The tobacco-only group showed decreased bilateral nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activation during reward anticipation as compared to the alcohol-only group, the control group, and both polysubstance groups. Interestingly, no differences emerged between the cannabis-only group and any of the other groups. Results from this study suggest that youth who tend toward single-substance tobacco use may possess behavioral and/or neurobiological characteristics that differentiate them from both their substance-using and non-substance-using peers. |
topic |
Adolescent Cannabis Tobacco fMRI Monetary incentive delay |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929315000523 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hollisckaroly doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents AT angeladbryan doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents AT barbarajweiland doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents AT andrewmayer doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents AT andrewdodd doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents AT sarahwfeldsteinewing doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents |
_version_ |
1725535628795314176 |