Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents

Numerous questions surround the nature of reward processing in the developing adolescent brain, particularly in regard to polysubstance use. We therefore sought to examine incentive-elicited brain activation in the context of three common substances of abuse (cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol). Due to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hollis C. Karoly, Angela D. Bryan, Barbara J. Weiland, Andrew Mayer, Andrew Dodd, Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-12-01
Series:Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929315000523
id doaj-78cf7b0012a4498fb1b9b9753f0d8b4d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78cf7b0012a4498fb1b9b9753f0d8b4d2020-11-24T23:32:02ZengElsevierDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience1878-92931878-93072015-12-0116C51510.1016/j.dcn.2015.05.005Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescentsHollis C. Karoly0Angela D. Bryan1Barbara J. Weiland2Andrew Mayer3Andrew Dodd4Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing5University of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USAUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USAUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USAThe Mind Research Network/LBERI, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USAThe Mind Research Network/LBERI, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USADepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USANumerous questions surround the nature of reward processing in the developing adolescent brain, particularly in regard to polysubstance use. We therefore sought to examine incentive-elicited brain activation in the context of three common substances of abuse (cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol). Due to the role of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in incentive processing, we compared activation in this region during anticipation of reward and loss using a monetary incentive delay (MID) task. Adolescents (ages 14–18; 66% male) were matched on age, gender, and frequency of use of any common substances within six distinct groups: cannabis-only (n = 14), tobacco-only (n = 34), alcohol-only (n = 12), cannabis + tobacco (n = 17), cannabis + tobacco + alcohol (n = 17), and non-using controls (n = 38). All groups showed comparable behavioral performance on the MID task. The tobacco-only group showed decreased bilateral nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activation during reward anticipation as compared to the alcohol-only group, the control group, and both polysubstance groups. Interestingly, no differences emerged between the cannabis-only group and any of the other groups. Results from this study suggest that youth who tend toward single-substance tobacco use may possess behavioral and/or neurobiological characteristics that differentiate them from both their substance-using and non-substance-using peers.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929315000523AdolescentCannabisTobaccofMRIMonetary incentive delay
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hollis C. Karoly
Angela D. Bryan
Barbara J. Weiland
Andrew Mayer
Andrew Dodd
Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing
spellingShingle Hollis C. Karoly
Angela D. Bryan
Barbara J. Weiland
Andrew Mayer
Andrew Dodd
Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing
Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Adolescent
Cannabis
Tobacco
fMRI
Monetary incentive delay
author_facet Hollis C. Karoly
Angela D. Bryan
Barbara J. Weiland
Andrew Mayer
Andrew Dodd
Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing
author_sort Hollis C. Karoly
title Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents
title_short Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents
title_full Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents
title_fullStr Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? An examination with adolescents
title_sort does incentive-elicited nucleus accumbens activation differ by substance of abuse? an examination with adolescents
publisher Elsevier
series Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
issn 1878-9293
1878-9307
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Numerous questions surround the nature of reward processing in the developing adolescent brain, particularly in regard to polysubstance use. We therefore sought to examine incentive-elicited brain activation in the context of three common substances of abuse (cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol). Due to the role of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in incentive processing, we compared activation in this region during anticipation of reward and loss using a monetary incentive delay (MID) task. Adolescents (ages 14–18; 66% male) were matched on age, gender, and frequency of use of any common substances within six distinct groups: cannabis-only (n = 14), tobacco-only (n = 34), alcohol-only (n = 12), cannabis + tobacco (n = 17), cannabis + tobacco + alcohol (n = 17), and non-using controls (n = 38). All groups showed comparable behavioral performance on the MID task. The tobacco-only group showed decreased bilateral nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activation during reward anticipation as compared to the alcohol-only group, the control group, and both polysubstance groups. Interestingly, no differences emerged between the cannabis-only group and any of the other groups. Results from this study suggest that youth who tend toward single-substance tobacco use may possess behavioral and/or neurobiological characteristics that differentiate them from both their substance-using and non-substance-using peers.
topic Adolescent
Cannabis
Tobacco
fMRI
Monetary incentive delay
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929315000523
work_keys_str_mv AT hollisckaroly doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents
AT angeladbryan doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents
AT barbarajweiland doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents
AT andrewmayer doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents
AT andrewdodd doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents
AT sarahwfeldsteinewing doesincentiveelicitednucleusaccumbensactivationdifferbysubstanceofabuseanexaminationwithadolescents
_version_ 1725535628795314176