Flowering time evolution is independent of serpentine tolerance in the California flora

Abstract Comparative phylogenetic tests have been only recently applied to the many hypotheses about the role ultramafic (serpentine) soils play in the evolution and ecology of regional floras. An association between serpentine tolerance and early flowering has been observed at microevolutionary sca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adam Schneider
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-04-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1767
id doaj-78bc0e5f3f4b454baba61e5fcfc5c469
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78bc0e5f3f4b454baba61e5fcfc5c4692020-11-25T03:41:26ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252017-04-0184n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.1767Flowering time evolution is independent of serpentine tolerance in the California floraAdam Schneider0Jepson Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology University of California 1001 Valley Life Sciences Building Berkeley California 94720 USAAbstract Comparative phylogenetic tests have been only recently applied to the many hypotheses about the role ultramafic (serpentine) soils play in the evolution and ecology of regional floras. An association between serpentine tolerance and early flowering has been observed at microevolutionary scales but not yet tested broadly across angiosperms. I used both hypothesis testing (phylogenetically independent contrasts) and model‐selection approaches to compare published data of serpentine tolerance with flowering time using phylogenetic trees representing 24 clades of plants representing 27 genera and 17 families. A total of 126 independent contrasts revealed no significant difference in flowering times across all clades or within any one clade except for the Thelypodieae, in which flowering time of serpentine‐tolerant lineages was later. Similarly, an Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck model with one optimal flowering time was preferred over a model with separate optima depending on serpentine tolerance in nearly all genera. A phylogenetically un‐corrected ANOVA found that serpentine‐tolerant species have an earlier distribution of flowering times compared to both endemic and non‐tolerant species, and median flowering times of non‐tolerant species show a bimodal distribution. Therefore, I conclude that the long‐term evolutionary responses of flowering time in a lineage that becomes tolerant of serpentine are variable across genera, with no significant overall bias toward earlier or later flowering. However, given that close relatives of serpentine‐tolerant lineages tend to also flower relatively early, early flowering time may serve as an exaptation for serpentine tolerance. In combination with previously published ecotype studies, these results illustrate the eco‐evolutionary scale dependence of flowering time.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1767Californiacomparative phylogeneticsedaphic specializationexaptationindependent contrastsphenology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adam Schneider
spellingShingle Adam Schneider
Flowering time evolution is independent of serpentine tolerance in the California flora
Ecosphere
California
comparative phylogenetics
edaphic specialization
exaptation
independent contrasts
phenology
author_facet Adam Schneider
author_sort Adam Schneider
title Flowering time evolution is independent of serpentine tolerance in the California flora
title_short Flowering time evolution is independent of serpentine tolerance in the California flora
title_full Flowering time evolution is independent of serpentine tolerance in the California flora
title_fullStr Flowering time evolution is independent of serpentine tolerance in the California flora
title_full_unstemmed Flowering time evolution is independent of serpentine tolerance in the California flora
title_sort flowering time evolution is independent of serpentine tolerance in the california flora
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Abstract Comparative phylogenetic tests have been only recently applied to the many hypotheses about the role ultramafic (serpentine) soils play in the evolution and ecology of regional floras. An association between serpentine tolerance and early flowering has been observed at microevolutionary scales but not yet tested broadly across angiosperms. I used both hypothesis testing (phylogenetically independent contrasts) and model‐selection approaches to compare published data of serpentine tolerance with flowering time using phylogenetic trees representing 24 clades of plants representing 27 genera and 17 families. A total of 126 independent contrasts revealed no significant difference in flowering times across all clades or within any one clade except for the Thelypodieae, in which flowering time of serpentine‐tolerant lineages was later. Similarly, an Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck model with one optimal flowering time was preferred over a model with separate optima depending on serpentine tolerance in nearly all genera. A phylogenetically un‐corrected ANOVA found that serpentine‐tolerant species have an earlier distribution of flowering times compared to both endemic and non‐tolerant species, and median flowering times of non‐tolerant species show a bimodal distribution. Therefore, I conclude that the long‐term evolutionary responses of flowering time in a lineage that becomes tolerant of serpentine are variable across genera, with no significant overall bias toward earlier or later flowering. However, given that close relatives of serpentine‐tolerant lineages tend to also flower relatively early, early flowering time may serve as an exaptation for serpentine tolerance. In combination with previously published ecotype studies, these results illustrate the eco‐evolutionary scale dependence of flowering time.
topic California
comparative phylogenetics
edaphic specialization
exaptation
independent contrasts
phenology
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1767
work_keys_str_mv AT adamschneider floweringtimeevolutionisindependentofserpentinetoleranceinthecaliforniaflora
_version_ 1724529642736451584