Application of a diagnosis-based clinical decision guide in patients with low back pain

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Low back pain (LBP) is common and costly. Development of accurate and efficacious methods of diagnosis and treatment has been identified as a research priority. A diagnosis-based clinical decision guide (DBCDG; previously referred to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Murphy Donald R, Hurwitz Eric L
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-10-01
Series:Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://chiromt.com/content/19/1/26
id doaj-78b851d6d59b41b4ae224d01b72c694e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78b851d6d59b41b4ae224d01b72c694e2020-11-25T02:02:29ZengBMCChiropractic & Manual Therapies2045-709X2011-10-011912610.1186/2045-709X-19-26Application of a diagnosis-based clinical decision guide in patients with low back painMurphy Donald RHurwitz Eric L<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Low back pain (LBP) is common and costly. Development of accurate and efficacious methods of diagnosis and treatment has been identified as a research priority. A diagnosis-based clinical decision guide (DBCDG; previously referred to as a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule) has been proposed which attempts to provide the clinician with a systematic, evidence-based means to apply the biopsychosocial model of care. The approach is based on three questions of diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to present the prevalence of findings using the DBCDG in consecutive patients with LBP.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Demographic, diagnostic and baseline outcome measure data were gathered on a cohort of LBP patients examined by one of three examiners trained in the application of the DBCDG.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Data were gathered on 264 patients. Signs of visceral disease or potentially serious illness were found in 2.7%. Centralization signs were found in 41%, lumbar and sacroiliac segmental signs in 23% and 27%, respectively and radicular signs were found in 24%. Clinically relevant myofascial signs were diagnosed in 10%. Dynamic instability was diagnosed in 63%, fear beliefs in 40%, central pain hypersensitivity in 5%, passive coping in 3% and depression in 3%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The DBCDG can be applied in a busy private practice environment. Further studies are needed to investigate clinically relevant means to identify central pain hypersensitivity, poor coping and depression, correlations and patterns among the diagnostic components of the DBCDG as well as inter-examiner reliability and efficacy of treatment based on the DBCDG.</p> http://chiromt.com/content/19/1/26low back paindiagnosistherapeuticspractice-based research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Murphy Donald R
Hurwitz Eric L
spellingShingle Murphy Donald R
Hurwitz Eric L
Application of a diagnosis-based clinical decision guide in patients with low back pain
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
low back pain
diagnosis
therapeutics
practice-based research
author_facet Murphy Donald R
Hurwitz Eric L
author_sort Murphy Donald R
title Application of a diagnosis-based clinical decision guide in patients with low back pain
title_short Application of a diagnosis-based clinical decision guide in patients with low back pain
title_full Application of a diagnosis-based clinical decision guide in patients with low back pain
title_fullStr Application of a diagnosis-based clinical decision guide in patients with low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Application of a diagnosis-based clinical decision guide in patients with low back pain
title_sort application of a diagnosis-based clinical decision guide in patients with low back pain
publisher BMC
series Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
issn 2045-709X
publishDate 2011-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Low back pain (LBP) is common and costly. Development of accurate and efficacious methods of diagnosis and treatment has been identified as a research priority. A diagnosis-based clinical decision guide (DBCDG; previously referred to as a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule) has been proposed which attempts to provide the clinician with a systematic, evidence-based means to apply the biopsychosocial model of care. The approach is based on three questions of diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to present the prevalence of findings using the DBCDG in consecutive patients with LBP.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Demographic, diagnostic and baseline outcome measure data were gathered on a cohort of LBP patients examined by one of three examiners trained in the application of the DBCDG.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Data were gathered on 264 patients. Signs of visceral disease or potentially serious illness were found in 2.7%. Centralization signs were found in 41%, lumbar and sacroiliac segmental signs in 23% and 27%, respectively and radicular signs were found in 24%. Clinically relevant myofascial signs were diagnosed in 10%. Dynamic instability was diagnosed in 63%, fear beliefs in 40%, central pain hypersensitivity in 5%, passive coping in 3% and depression in 3%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The DBCDG can be applied in a busy private practice environment. Further studies are needed to investigate clinically relevant means to identify central pain hypersensitivity, poor coping and depression, correlations and patterns among the diagnostic components of the DBCDG as well as inter-examiner reliability and efficacy of treatment based on the DBCDG.</p>
topic low back pain
diagnosis
therapeutics
practice-based research
url http://chiromt.com/content/19/1/26
work_keys_str_mv AT murphydonaldr applicationofadiagnosisbasedclinicaldecisionguideinpatientswithlowbackpain
AT hurwitzericl applicationofadiagnosisbasedclinicaldecisionguideinpatientswithlowbackpain
_version_ 1724952680437121024