Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?

Several countries take for granted the fact that the choice of an official language is a State exclusive prerogative. This was confirmed by both the European Court of Human Rights and the U.N. Human Rights Committee on several occasions. There remains however a matter of dispute altogether fundament...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernand de Varennes
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: L’Harmattan 2012-06-01
Series:Droit et Cultures
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/droitcultures/2880
id doaj-78afbafb2ba2429ea1060f62331b1c3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78afbafb2ba2429ea1060f62331b1c3a2020-11-24T23:57:18ZfraL’HarmattanDroit et Cultures0247-97882109-94212012-06-01634158Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?Fernand de VarennesSeveral countries take for granted the fact that the choice of an official language is a State exclusive prerogative. This was confirmed by both the European Court of Human Rights and the U.N. Human Rights Committee on several occasions. There remains however a matter of dispute altogether fundamental and yet often quite misunderstood by some governments as well as by jurists themselves. Indeed, what happens when legislations on the choice of one or more official language(s) exclude or even in some extreme cases « criminalise »the use of another language even within a domestic or private context? This paper attempts to provide an answer to this question by establishing how and why – although the choice of an official language indeed constitutes a prerogative of the State– it doesn’t imply a government to trespass the international law, especially the human rights. Thus, wherever the implementation of a fundamental right such as freedom of expression or forbiddance of discrimination based on language would have the indirect effect of creating a « linguistic right », this right would prevail on the national stipulations regarding official language(s). The resulting establishment of a jurisprudence at the international level remains, however a matter some stakeholders have difficulty to agree upon.http://journals.openedition.org/droitcultures/2880HistoryHuman RightsLinguistic RightsMinority LanguagesOfficial Languages
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fernand de Varennes
spellingShingle Fernand de Varennes
Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?
Droit et Cultures
History
Human Rights
Linguistic Rights
Minority Languages
Official Languages
author_facet Fernand de Varennes
author_sort Fernand de Varennes
title Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?
title_short Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?
title_full Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?
title_fullStr Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?
title_full_unstemmed Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?
title_sort langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?
publisher L’Harmattan
series Droit et Cultures
issn 0247-9788
2109-9421
publishDate 2012-06-01
description Several countries take for granted the fact that the choice of an official language is a State exclusive prerogative. This was confirmed by both the European Court of Human Rights and the U.N. Human Rights Committee on several occasions. There remains however a matter of dispute altogether fundamental and yet often quite misunderstood by some governments as well as by jurists themselves. Indeed, what happens when legislations on the choice of one or more official language(s) exclude or even in some extreme cases « criminalise »the use of another language even within a domestic or private context? This paper attempts to provide an answer to this question by establishing how and why – although the choice of an official language indeed constitutes a prerogative of the State– it doesn’t imply a government to trespass the international law, especially the human rights. Thus, wherever the implementation of a fundamental right such as freedom of expression or forbiddance of discrimination based on language would have the indirect effect of creating a « linguistic right », this right would prevail on the national stipulations regarding official language(s). The resulting establishment of a jurisprudence at the international level remains, however a matter some stakeholders have difficulty to agree upon.
topic History
Human Rights
Linguistic Rights
Minority Languages
Official Languages
url http://journals.openedition.org/droitcultures/2880
work_keys_str_mv AT fernanddevarennes languesofficiellesversusdroitslinguistiqueslunexclutillautre
_version_ 1725454589377904640