The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives

The paper sets out to describe the most relevant social tendencies that can influence the Dutch judicial system’s domain in the medium term and to evaluate the possible effects of these tendencies on the composition of legal fields. American legal theory concerning the role of the courts’ functions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marc Loth, Elaine Mak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2007-06-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.38/
id doaj-78ac6607a4a74769824489dbd434dc7a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78ac6607a4a74769824489dbd434dc7a2020-11-25T02:10:11ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2007-06-01317510010.18352/ulr.3838The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectivesMarc LothElaine MakThe paper sets out to describe the most relevant social tendencies that can influence the Dutch judicial system’s domain in the medium term and to evaluate the possible effects of these tendencies on the composition of legal fields. American legal theory concerning the role of the courts’ functions is a frame of reference for the analysis. In the light of a quantitative paradigm, first, the judicial domain is represented in figures and demarcated with respect to the domains of other relevant activities and participants. The social role of courts in the Dutch legal system is then considered in the light of a qualitative paradigm, focusing on the influence of the judge and the impact of his judgments. These lines of thought are brought together in the description of a few possible scenarios for the development of the judicial domain in the Netherlands in the years to come. A few conclusions round off this investigation.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.38/judicial organisationlegal theorythe Netherlandsthe United States
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marc Loth
Elaine Mak
spellingShingle Marc Loth
Elaine Mak
The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives
Utrecht Law Review
judicial organisation
legal theory
the Netherlands
the United States
author_facet Marc Loth
Elaine Mak
author_sort Marc Loth
title The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives
title_short The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives
title_full The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives
title_fullStr The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives
title_full_unstemmed The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives
title_sort judicial domain in view<br> figures, trends and perspectives
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2007-06-01
description The paper sets out to describe the most relevant social tendencies that can influence the Dutch judicial system’s domain in the medium term and to evaluate the possible effects of these tendencies on the composition of legal fields. American legal theory concerning the role of the courts’ functions is a frame of reference for the analysis. In the light of a quantitative paradigm, first, the judicial domain is represented in figures and demarcated with respect to the domains of other relevant activities and participants. The social role of courts in the Dutch legal system is then considered in the light of a qualitative paradigm, focusing on the influence of the judge and the impact of his judgments. These lines of thought are brought together in the description of a few possible scenarios for the development of the judicial domain in the Netherlands in the years to come. A few conclusions round off this investigation.
topic judicial organisation
legal theory
the Netherlands
the United States
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.38/
work_keys_str_mv AT marcloth thejudicialdomaininviewltbrgtfigurestrendsandperspectives
AT elainemak thejudicialdomaininviewltbrgtfigurestrendsandperspectives
AT marcloth judicialdomaininviewltbrgtfigurestrendsandperspectives
AT elainemak judicialdomaininviewltbrgtfigurestrendsandperspectives
_version_ 1724920317859594240