The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives
The paper sets out to describe the most relevant social tendencies that can influence the Dutch judicial system’s domain in the medium term and to evaluate the possible effects of these tendencies on the composition of legal fields. American legal theory concerning the role of the courts’ functions...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University School of Law
2007-06-01
|
Series: | Utrecht Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.38/ |
id |
doaj-78ac6607a4a74769824489dbd434dc7a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-78ac6607a4a74769824489dbd434dc7a2020-11-25T02:10:11ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2007-06-01317510010.18352/ulr.3838The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectivesMarc LothElaine MakThe paper sets out to describe the most relevant social tendencies that can influence the Dutch judicial system’s domain in the medium term and to evaluate the possible effects of these tendencies on the composition of legal fields. American legal theory concerning the role of the courts’ functions is a frame of reference for the analysis. In the light of a quantitative paradigm, first, the judicial domain is represented in figures and demarcated with respect to the domains of other relevant activities and participants. The social role of courts in the Dutch legal system is then considered in the light of a qualitative paradigm, focusing on the influence of the judge and the impact of his judgments. These lines of thought are brought together in the description of a few possible scenarios for the development of the judicial domain in the Netherlands in the years to come. A few conclusions round off this investigation.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.38/judicial organisationlegal theorythe Netherlandsthe United States |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marc Loth Elaine Mak |
spellingShingle |
Marc Loth Elaine Mak The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives Utrecht Law Review judicial organisation legal theory the Netherlands the United States |
author_facet |
Marc Loth Elaine Mak |
author_sort |
Marc Loth |
title |
The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives |
title_short |
The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives |
title_full |
The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives |
title_fullStr |
The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed |
The judicial domain in view<br> Figures, trends and perspectives |
title_sort |
judicial domain in view<br> figures, trends and perspectives |
publisher |
Utrecht University School of Law |
series |
Utrecht Law Review |
issn |
1871-515X |
publishDate |
2007-06-01 |
description |
The paper sets out to describe the most relevant social tendencies that can influence the Dutch judicial system’s domain in the medium term and to evaluate the possible effects of these tendencies on the composition of legal fields. American legal theory concerning the role of the courts’ functions is a frame of reference for the analysis. In the light of a quantitative paradigm, first, the judicial domain is represented in figures and demarcated with respect to the domains of other relevant activities and participants. The social role of courts in the Dutch legal system is then considered in the light of a qualitative paradigm, focusing on the influence of the judge and the impact of his judgments. These lines of thought are brought together in the description of a few possible scenarios for the development of the judicial domain in the Netherlands in the years to come. A few conclusions round off this investigation. |
topic |
judicial organisation legal theory the Netherlands the United States |
url |
http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.38/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcloth thejudicialdomaininviewltbrgtfigurestrendsandperspectives AT elainemak thejudicialdomaininviewltbrgtfigurestrendsandperspectives AT marcloth judicialdomaininviewltbrgtfigurestrendsandperspectives AT elainemak judicialdomaininviewltbrgtfigurestrendsandperspectives |
_version_ |
1724920317859594240 |