The prohibition of abuse of rights in the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbian

This paper explores, explains and critically evaluates the legal provision on abuse of rights proposed in Article 20 of the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia. The author first briefly presents the institutional development and analyzes the contemporary theoretical dilemmas about the nature...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rašević Živorad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Law, Niš 2020-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0350-8501/2020/0350-85012089353R.pdf
id doaj-78a6306549414b7ebba9f19a1ad83632
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78a6306549414b7ebba9f19a1ad836322021-07-20T07:41:55ZengFaculty of Law, NišZbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu0350-85012560-31162020-01-01598935336710.5937/zrpfn0-292350350-85012089353RThe prohibition of abuse of rights in the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of SerbianRašević Živorad0Visoka škola za poslovnu ekonomiju i preduzetništvo, Beograd, SerbiaThis paper explores, explains and critically evaluates the legal provision on abuse of rights proposed in Article 20 of the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia. The author first briefly presents the institutional development and analyzes the contemporary theoretical dilemmas about the nature of this legal institute. Then, the author compares relevant Serbian and comparative law provisions de lege lata and de lege ferenda. Finally, the proposed legal solution is critically evaluated against the following criteria: its justification in the tradition of civil law doctrine and practice (case-law), adequacy in the development of modern civil law theory, envisaged content and information, and systemic and logical consistency. The research results expose the legislator's choice to formulate a new provision on the provision de lege lata, which is improved by introducing the concept of harm to others and subjective manifestations of abuse. This solution is criticised here for ommission to enumerate all abuse manifestations that have been recognized in civil law literature and case-law, as well as for the ommission to regulate this institute in compliance with modern approach based on the theory of internal limitations of subjective rights. Relying on the premises in the contemporary civil law literature, the author proposes a different provision de lege ferenda, which may more clearly express the nature of this institute and guide civil courts in the judicial interpretation and assessment of the consequences of the abuse of rights.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0350-8501/2020/0350-85012089353R.pdfcivil lawabuse of rightsprohibitionsubjective and objective approachinner and outer theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rašević Živorad
spellingShingle Rašević Živorad
The prohibition of abuse of rights in the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbian
Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu
civil law
abuse of rights
prohibition
subjective and objective approach
inner and outer theory
author_facet Rašević Živorad
author_sort Rašević Živorad
title The prohibition of abuse of rights in the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbian
title_short The prohibition of abuse of rights in the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbian
title_full The prohibition of abuse of rights in the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbian
title_fullStr The prohibition of abuse of rights in the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbian
title_full_unstemmed The prohibition of abuse of rights in the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbian
title_sort prohibition of abuse of rights in the draft civil code of the republic of serbian
publisher Faculty of Law, Niš
series Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu
issn 0350-8501
2560-3116
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This paper explores, explains and critically evaluates the legal provision on abuse of rights proposed in Article 20 of the Draft Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia. The author first briefly presents the institutional development and analyzes the contemporary theoretical dilemmas about the nature of this legal institute. Then, the author compares relevant Serbian and comparative law provisions de lege lata and de lege ferenda. Finally, the proposed legal solution is critically evaluated against the following criteria: its justification in the tradition of civil law doctrine and practice (case-law), adequacy in the development of modern civil law theory, envisaged content and information, and systemic and logical consistency. The research results expose the legislator's choice to formulate a new provision on the provision de lege lata, which is improved by introducing the concept of harm to others and subjective manifestations of abuse. This solution is criticised here for ommission to enumerate all abuse manifestations that have been recognized in civil law literature and case-law, as well as for the ommission to regulate this institute in compliance with modern approach based on the theory of internal limitations of subjective rights. Relying on the premises in the contemporary civil law literature, the author proposes a different provision de lege ferenda, which may more clearly express the nature of this institute and guide civil courts in the judicial interpretation and assessment of the consequences of the abuse of rights.
topic civil law
abuse of rights
prohibition
subjective and objective approach
inner and outer theory
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0350-8501/2020/0350-85012089353R.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT raseviczivorad theprohibitionofabuseofrightsinthedraftcivilcodeoftherepublicofserbian
AT raseviczivorad prohibitionofabuseofrightsinthedraftcivilcodeoftherepublicofserbian
_version_ 1721293967028387840