KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI VAN HIELE PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA

This objective of this study is to describe competency of mathematic communication based on Van Hiele theory on geometry course viewed from visual and kinesthetic learning styles.  The study was conducted in STKIP PGRI Tulungagung in November 2013 to August 2014, assigning 45 students as sample.  Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fajar Hendro Utomo, Indah Setyo Wardhani, Muhammad Abdul Roziq Asrori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Center of Language and Culture Studies 2015-10-01
Series:Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cendekia.soloclcs.org/index.php/cendekia/article/view/37
id doaj-7877cdebf9b74a088835d0397b27dfdf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7877cdebf9b74a088835d0397b27dfdf2020-11-25T02:52:28ZengCenter of Language and Culture StudiesCendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran1978-20982407-85572015-10-019215917010.30957/cendekia.v9i2.3737KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI VAN HIELE PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKAFajar Hendro Utomo0Indah Setyo Wardhani1Muhammad Abdul Roziq Asrori2STKIP TulungagungSTKIP TulungagungSTKIP TulungagungThis objective of this study is to describe competency of mathematic communication based on Van Hiele theory on geometry course viewed from visual and kinesthetic learning styles.  The study was conducted in STKIP PGRI Tulungagung in November 2013 to August 2014, assigning 45 students as sample.  The study revealed that: First,  auditory learning style was achieved by: Level 1 = 0, Level 2 = 2, Level 3 = 9, Level 4 = 4, and Level 5 = 0, averaging at Level 3.  This means that students do not understand when they construct  definition, argument, role, formal deduction they worked;  Second, kinesthetic learning style was achieved by: Level 1 = 0, Level 2 = 6, Level 3 = 10, Level 4 = 2, and Level 5 = 0, averaging at Level 3.  This means that students do not understand on the work as done through auditory learning style.https://cendekia.soloclcs.org/index.php/cendekia/article/view/37mathematic communicationlearning style
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fajar Hendro Utomo
Indah Setyo Wardhani
Muhammad Abdul Roziq Asrori
spellingShingle Fajar Hendro Utomo
Indah Setyo Wardhani
Muhammad Abdul Roziq Asrori
KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI VAN HIELE PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA
Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
mathematic communication
learning style
author_facet Fajar Hendro Utomo
Indah Setyo Wardhani
Muhammad Abdul Roziq Asrori
author_sort Fajar Hendro Utomo
title KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI VAN HIELE PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA
title_short KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI VAN HIELE PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA
title_full KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI VAN HIELE PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA
title_fullStr KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI VAN HIELE PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA
title_full_unstemmed KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI VAN HIELE PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA
title_sort komunikasi matematika berdasarkan teori van hiele pada mata kuliah geometri ditinjau dari gaya belajar mahasiswa program studi pendidikan matematika
publisher Center of Language and Culture Studies
series Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
issn 1978-2098
2407-8557
publishDate 2015-10-01
description This objective of this study is to describe competency of mathematic communication based on Van Hiele theory on geometry course viewed from visual and kinesthetic learning styles.  The study was conducted in STKIP PGRI Tulungagung in November 2013 to August 2014, assigning 45 students as sample.  The study revealed that: First,  auditory learning style was achieved by: Level 1 = 0, Level 2 = 2, Level 3 = 9, Level 4 = 4, and Level 5 = 0, averaging at Level 3.  This means that students do not understand when they construct  definition, argument, role, formal deduction they worked;  Second, kinesthetic learning style was achieved by: Level 1 = 0, Level 2 = 6, Level 3 = 10, Level 4 = 2, and Level 5 = 0, averaging at Level 3.  This means that students do not understand on the work as done through auditory learning style.
topic mathematic communication
learning style
url https://cendekia.soloclcs.org/index.php/cendekia/article/view/37
work_keys_str_mv AT fajarhendroutomo komunikasimatematikaberdasarkanteorivanhielepadamatakuliahgeometriditinjaudarigayabelajarmahasiswaprogramstudipendidikanmatematika
AT indahsetyowardhani komunikasimatematikaberdasarkanteorivanhielepadamatakuliahgeometriditinjaudarigayabelajarmahasiswaprogramstudipendidikanmatematika
AT muhammadabdulroziqasrori komunikasimatematikaberdasarkanteorivanhielepadamatakuliahgeometriditinjaudarigayabelajarmahasiswaprogramstudipendidikanmatematika
_version_ 1724729735517306880