Intergroup cooperation prevents resource exhaustion but undermines intra-group cooperation in the common-pool resource experiment

Can intergroup cooperation over resources help prevent resource exhaustion and mitigate effects of climate change? How does resource uncertainty affect inter- and intra- group cooperation over resources in the common-pool resource dilemmas? I present experimental evidence from a mixed design experim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karolina Safarzynska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2017-12-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss4/art10/
id doaj-786d2f34c31c40e6a7bca20888b015f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-786d2f34c31c40e6a7bca20888b015f42020-11-24T22:56:52ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872017-12-012241010.5751/ES-09681-2204109681Intergroup cooperation prevents resource exhaustion but undermines intra-group cooperation in the common-pool resource experimentKarolina Safarzynska0Faculty of Economic Sciences Warsaw UniversityCan intergroup cooperation over resources help prevent resource exhaustion and mitigate effects of climate change? How does resource uncertainty affect inter- and intra- group cooperation over resources in the common-pool resource dilemmas? I present experimental evidence from a mixed design experiment with two-between-groups factors: (1) the availability of intergroup sharing in which subjects can decide whether to give up some of their harvests to augment the resource stock of another group; (2) the presence (or absence) of shocks that can destroy a part of resources; and with one within-groups factor (41 replications). We present the evidence that random shocks encourage resource conservation. In addition, we find that intergroup cooperation is frequent. Many groups establish reciprocal exchanges of resources, which reduces the probability of resource exhaustion. The possible explanation of the high frequency of intergroup sharing in my sample is inequality aversion and reciprocity. Such reciprocal exchanges turned out to be successful in preventing resource collapse in the absence of shocks. However, the data I present show the dark sides of intergroup sharing. Subjects, who shared resources with the outgroup, harvested more for themselves following the donation. Moreover, under uncertainty, a combination of shocks and sharing made subjects overharvest resources.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss4/art10/climate changecommon pool resourcesintergroup cooperation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karolina Safarzynska
spellingShingle Karolina Safarzynska
Intergroup cooperation prevents resource exhaustion but undermines intra-group cooperation in the common-pool resource experiment
Ecology and Society
climate change
common pool resources
intergroup cooperation
author_facet Karolina Safarzynska
author_sort Karolina Safarzynska
title Intergroup cooperation prevents resource exhaustion but undermines intra-group cooperation in the common-pool resource experiment
title_short Intergroup cooperation prevents resource exhaustion but undermines intra-group cooperation in the common-pool resource experiment
title_full Intergroup cooperation prevents resource exhaustion but undermines intra-group cooperation in the common-pool resource experiment
title_fullStr Intergroup cooperation prevents resource exhaustion but undermines intra-group cooperation in the common-pool resource experiment
title_full_unstemmed Intergroup cooperation prevents resource exhaustion but undermines intra-group cooperation in the common-pool resource experiment
title_sort intergroup cooperation prevents resource exhaustion but undermines intra-group cooperation in the common-pool resource experiment
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Can intergroup cooperation over resources help prevent resource exhaustion and mitigate effects of climate change? How does resource uncertainty affect inter- and intra- group cooperation over resources in the common-pool resource dilemmas? I present experimental evidence from a mixed design experiment with two-between-groups factors: (1) the availability of intergroup sharing in which subjects can decide whether to give up some of their harvests to augment the resource stock of another group; (2) the presence (or absence) of shocks that can destroy a part of resources; and with one within-groups factor (41 replications). We present the evidence that random shocks encourage resource conservation. In addition, we find that intergroup cooperation is frequent. Many groups establish reciprocal exchanges of resources, which reduces the probability of resource exhaustion. The possible explanation of the high frequency of intergroup sharing in my sample is inequality aversion and reciprocity. Such reciprocal exchanges turned out to be successful in preventing resource collapse in the absence of shocks. However, the data I present show the dark sides of intergroup sharing. Subjects, who shared resources with the outgroup, harvested more for themselves following the donation. Moreover, under uncertainty, a combination of shocks and sharing made subjects overharvest resources.
topic climate change
common pool resources
intergroup cooperation
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss4/art10/
work_keys_str_mv AT karolinasafarzynska intergroupcooperationpreventsresourceexhaustionbutunderminesintragroupcooperationinthecommonpoolresourceexperiment
_version_ 1716389681013194752