Goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental study

Questions: In stroke rehabilitation, do goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice during therapy compared to a non-specific instruction? Is one type of goal-oriented instruction more effective at increasing the intensity of practice achieved by stroke survivors during therapy? De...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tessa Hillig, Haotian Ma, Simone Dorsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-04-01
Series:Journal of Physiotherapy
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955319300207
id doaj-785a84eeb6d14ebaacb17fb552bb7eb5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-785a84eeb6d14ebaacb17fb552bb7eb52020-11-25T01:59:03ZengElsevierJournal of Physiotherapy1836-95532019-04-016529598Goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental studyTessa Hillig0Haotian Ma1Simone Dorsch2School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, AustraliaSchool of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, AustraliaSchool of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia; StrokeEd collaboration, Sydney, Australia; Correspondence: Simone Dorsch, School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia.Questions: In stroke rehabilitation, do goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice during therapy compared to a non-specific instruction? Is one type of goal-oriented instruction more effective at increasing the intensity of practice achieved by stroke survivors during therapy? Design: A within-participant, repeated measures experimental study. Participants: Twenty-four adults undertaking stroke rehabilitation at a metropolitan hospital as an inpatient or outpatient. Intervention: Participants were observed performing exercises across 3 days. On each day, they performed an exercise with a non-specific instruction (‘do some [exercise]’) as a baseline measure and the same exercise with one of three goal-oriented instructions, delivered in a randomised order. The three goal-oriented instructions were: ‘do [exercise] 25 times’ (instruction A), ‘do [exercise] 25 times as fast as you can’ (instruction B), and ‘do [exercise] 25 times, as fast as you can, aiming for a personal best’ (instruction C). The last instruction included verbal encouragement during the exercise. Outcome measures: The time taken to complete 25 repetitions under the baseline condition and each instruction was recorded and converted into repetitions per minute. Results: All of the goal-oriented instructions resulted in a significant increase in the rate of repetitions of the exercise being performed compared to the baseline measure: percentage increase from baseline (95% CI) was 62% (31 to 93) with instruction A, 116% (67 to 165) with instruction B, and 128% (84 to 171) with instruction C. Instruction C had a significantly greater effect than instruction A: mean difference in percentage increase 65% (95% CI 13 to 118). Conclusion: Goal-oriented instructions can result in significant increases in the rate of repetitions of exercise in stroke rehabilitation. The use of goal-oriented instructions is a simple, no-cost strategy that can be used to increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation. Trial registration: ACTRN12619000146190. Key words: Stroke, Practice, Communication, Rehabilitation, Physical therapyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955319300207
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tessa Hillig
Haotian Ma
Simone Dorsch
spellingShingle Tessa Hillig
Haotian Ma
Simone Dorsch
Goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental study
Journal of Physiotherapy
author_facet Tessa Hillig
Haotian Ma
Simone Dorsch
author_sort Tessa Hillig
title Goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental study
title_short Goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental study
title_full Goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental study
title_fullStr Goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental study
title_sort goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation compared with non-specific instructions: a within-participant, repeated measures experimental study
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Physiotherapy
issn 1836-9553
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Questions: In stroke rehabilitation, do goal-oriented instructions increase the intensity of practice during therapy compared to a non-specific instruction? Is one type of goal-oriented instruction more effective at increasing the intensity of practice achieved by stroke survivors during therapy? Design: A within-participant, repeated measures experimental study. Participants: Twenty-four adults undertaking stroke rehabilitation at a metropolitan hospital as an inpatient or outpatient. Intervention: Participants were observed performing exercises across 3 days. On each day, they performed an exercise with a non-specific instruction (‘do some [exercise]’) as a baseline measure and the same exercise with one of three goal-oriented instructions, delivered in a randomised order. The three goal-oriented instructions were: ‘do [exercise] 25 times’ (instruction A), ‘do [exercise] 25 times as fast as you can’ (instruction B), and ‘do [exercise] 25 times, as fast as you can, aiming for a personal best’ (instruction C). The last instruction included verbal encouragement during the exercise. Outcome measures: The time taken to complete 25 repetitions under the baseline condition and each instruction was recorded and converted into repetitions per minute. Results: All of the goal-oriented instructions resulted in a significant increase in the rate of repetitions of the exercise being performed compared to the baseline measure: percentage increase from baseline (95% CI) was 62% (31 to 93) with instruction A, 116% (67 to 165) with instruction B, and 128% (84 to 171) with instruction C. Instruction C had a significantly greater effect than instruction A: mean difference in percentage increase 65% (95% CI 13 to 118). Conclusion: Goal-oriented instructions can result in significant increases in the rate of repetitions of exercise in stroke rehabilitation. The use of goal-oriented instructions is a simple, no-cost strategy that can be used to increase the intensity of practice in stroke rehabilitation. Trial registration: ACTRN12619000146190. Key words: Stroke, Practice, Communication, Rehabilitation, Physical therapy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955319300207
work_keys_str_mv AT tessahillig goalorientedinstructionsincreasetheintensityofpracticeinstrokerehabilitationcomparedwithnonspecificinstructionsawithinparticipantrepeatedmeasuresexperimentalstudy
AT haotianma goalorientedinstructionsincreasetheintensityofpracticeinstrokerehabilitationcomparedwithnonspecificinstructionsawithinparticipantrepeatedmeasuresexperimentalstudy
AT simonedorsch goalorientedinstructionsincreasetheintensityofpracticeinstrokerehabilitationcomparedwithnonspecificinstructionsawithinparticipantrepeatedmeasuresexperimentalstudy
_version_ 1724966197363998720