NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ
A comparative spatial analysis of surface hardness of structural concrete is introduced. Main objective of the paper is to make a repeatability comparison of three types of the still most popular non-destructive testing devices for concrete: L-type original Schmidt rebound hammer, N-type original S...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Engineering Structures and Technologies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/EST/article/view/2826 |
id |
doaj-785603859493445494fe41876f66f487 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-785603859493445494fe41876f66f4872021-07-02T08:06:48ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityEngineering Structures and Technologies2029-882X2029-88382015-12-017110.3846/2029882X.2015.1085331NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situAdorján Borosnyói0Department of Construction Materials and Technologies, Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME), H-1111 Budapest, Muegyetem rkp. 3, Hungary A comparative spatial analysis of surface hardness of structural concrete is introduced. Main objective of the paper is to make a repeatability comparison of three types of the still most popular non-destructive testing devices for concrete: L-type original Schmidt rebound hammer, N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer and N-type Silver Schmidt rebound hammer. Results indicate that the surface hardness measurement uncertainty is related to the weight of the hammer mass and is apparently not related to the impact energy of the rebound hammer devices. It is observed that the measure of surface hardness for the Silver Schmidt rebound hammer (Q-value) does not have positive correlation to the original rebound index (R). Results indicate the best performance of the N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer in terms of stability and normality of data. Geostatistical analysis of the measured data (in terms of empirical semivariograms) highlights different statistical behaviour for the mechanical recording rebound hammers and for the electro-optical recording rebound hammer. https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/EST/article/view/2826concretesurface hardnessrebound hammerrepeatabilityspatial analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adorján Borosnyói |
spellingShingle |
Adorján Borosnyói NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ Engineering Structures and Technologies concrete surface hardness rebound hammer repeatability spatial analysis |
author_facet |
Adorján Borosnyói |
author_sort |
Adorján Borosnyói |
title |
NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ |
title_short |
NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ |
title_full |
NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ |
title_fullStr |
NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ |
title_full_unstemmed |
NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ |
title_sort |
ndt assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ |
publisher |
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University |
series |
Engineering Structures and Technologies |
issn |
2029-882X 2029-8838 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
A comparative spatial analysis of surface hardness of structural concrete is introduced. Main objective of the paper is to make a repeatability comparison of three types of the still most popular non-destructive testing devices for concrete: L-type original Schmidt rebound hammer, N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer and N-type Silver Schmidt rebound hammer. Results indicate that the surface hardness measurement uncertainty is related to the weight of the hammer mass and is apparently not related to the impact energy of the rebound hammer devices. It is observed that the measure of surface hardness for the Silver Schmidt rebound hammer (Q-value) does not have positive correlation to the original rebound index (R). Results indicate the best performance of the N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer in terms of stability and normality of data. Geostatistical analysis of the measured data (in terms of empirical semivariograms) highlights different statistical behaviour for the mechanical recording rebound hammers and for the electro-optical recording rebound hammer.
|
topic |
concrete surface hardness rebound hammer repeatability spatial analysis |
url |
https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/EST/article/view/2826 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adorjanborosnyoi ndtassessmentofexistingconcretestructuresspatialanalysisofreboundhammerresultsrecordedinsitu |
_version_ |
1721335120481222656 |