NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ

A comparative spatial analysis of surface hardness of structural concrete is introduced. Main objective of the paper is to make a repeatability comparison of three types of the still most popular non-destructive testing devices for concrete: L-type original Schmidt rebound hammer, N-type original S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adorján Borosnyói
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2015-12-01
Series:Engineering Structures and Technologies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/EST/article/view/2826
id doaj-785603859493445494fe41876f66f487
record_format Article
spelling doaj-785603859493445494fe41876f66f4872021-07-02T08:06:48ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityEngineering Structures and Technologies2029-882X2029-88382015-12-017110.3846/2029882X.2015.1085331NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situAdorján Borosnyói0Department of Construction Materials and Technologies, Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME), H-1111 Budapest, Muegyetem rkp. 3, Hungary A comparative spatial analysis of surface hardness of structural concrete is introduced. Main objective of the paper is to make a repeatability comparison of three types of the still most popular non-destructive testing devices for concrete: L-type original Schmidt rebound hammer, N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer and N-type Silver Schmidt rebound hammer. Results indicate that the surface hardness measurement uncertainty is related to the weight of the hammer mass and is apparently not related to the impact energy of the rebound hammer devices. It is observed that the measure of surface hardness for the Silver Schmidt rebound hammer (Q-value) does not have positive correlation to the original rebound index (R). Results indicate the best performance of the N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer in terms of stability and normality of data. Geostatistical analysis of the measured data (in terms of empirical semivariograms) highlights different statistical behaviour for the mechanical recording rebound hammers and for the electro-optical recording rebound hammer. https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/EST/article/view/2826concretesurface hardnessrebound hammerrepeatabilityspatial analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adorján Borosnyói
spellingShingle Adorján Borosnyói
NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ
Engineering Structures and Technologies
concrete
surface hardness
rebound hammer
repeatability
spatial analysis
author_facet Adorján Borosnyói
author_sort Adorján Borosnyói
title NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ
title_short NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ
title_full NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ
title_fullStr NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ
title_full_unstemmed NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ
title_sort ndt assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series Engineering Structures and Technologies
issn 2029-882X
2029-8838
publishDate 2015-12-01
description A comparative spatial analysis of surface hardness of structural concrete is introduced. Main objective of the paper is to make a repeatability comparison of three types of the still most popular non-destructive testing devices for concrete: L-type original Schmidt rebound hammer, N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer and N-type Silver Schmidt rebound hammer. Results indicate that the surface hardness measurement uncertainty is related to the weight of the hammer mass and is apparently not related to the impact energy of the rebound hammer devices. It is observed that the measure of surface hardness for the Silver Schmidt rebound hammer (Q-value) does not have positive correlation to the original rebound index (R). Results indicate the best performance of the N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer in terms of stability and normality of data. Geostatistical analysis of the measured data (in terms of empirical semivariograms) highlights different statistical behaviour for the mechanical recording rebound hammers and for the electro-optical recording rebound hammer.
topic concrete
surface hardness
rebound hammer
repeatability
spatial analysis
url https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/EST/article/view/2826
work_keys_str_mv AT adorjanborosnyoi ndtassessmentofexistingconcretestructuresspatialanalysisofreboundhammerresultsrecordedinsitu
_version_ 1721335120481222656