Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke

Abstract Background Studies have suggested that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as tirofiban are beneficial for patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, it is still uncertain about the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods In this prosp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chunrong Tao, Yuyou Zhu, Chao Zhang, Jianlong Song, Tianlong Liu, Xiaodong Yuan, Wenwu Luo, Changchun Chen, Dezhi Liu, Yuanyuan Zhu, Jie Liu, Wei Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:BMC Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02268-8
id doaj-784820da5e3e49fdba8caebf4d7878e4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-784820da5e3e49fdba8caebf4d7878e42021-06-27T11:23:43ZengBMCBMC Neurology1471-23772021-06-012111710.1186/s12883-021-02268-8Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic strokeChunrong Tao0Yuyou Zhu1Chao Zhang2Jianlong Song3Tianlong Liu4Xiaodong Yuan5Wenwu Luo6Changchun Chen7Dezhi Liu8Yuanyuan Zhu9Jie Liu10Wei Hu11Stroke Center & Department of Neurology, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of ChinaStroke Center & Department of Neurology, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of ChinaStroke Center & Department of Neurology, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of ChinaStroke Center & Department of Neurology, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of ChinaStroke Center & Department of Neurology, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of ChinaStroke Center & Department of Neurology, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of ChinaDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical UniversityDepartment of Neurology, The Second People’s Hospital of Anhui ProvinceDepartment of Neurology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCMPeople’s Hospital of LiXin CountyPeople’s Hospital of LiXin CountyStroke Center & Department of Neurology, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of ChinaAbstract Background Studies have suggested that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as tirofiban are beneficial for patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, it is still uncertain about the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods In this prospective non-randomized study, 255 AIS patients were recruited from 4 comprehensive stroke centers in China between January, 2017 and May, 2018. Among them,169 patients were treated with aspirin plus clopidogrel and 86 patients were treated with tirofiban. The primary functional outcome was the distribution of the 90 days’ modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The safety outcomes included the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) at discharge and mortality at 3 months. Results In the propensity score matched cohort, tirofiban alone was noninferior to the dual antiplatelet with regard to the primary outcome (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 2.04; P = 0.93). Mortality at 90 days was 10% in the dual antiplatelet group and 8% in the tirofiban group (adjusted odds ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.08 to 7.40, p = 0.81). There was no difference of the ICH rate between two groups (adjusted odds ratio 0.44; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.48, p = 0.18). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting-propensity score-adjusted cohort, similar differences were found for functional and safety outcomes. Conclusions Our study suggested that tirofiban use appears to be safe as monotherapy in AIS treatment compared with common dual antiplatelet therapy, however, no improvement in functional outcomes was found. Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR2000034443 , 05/07/2020. Retrospectively registered.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02268-8Acute ischemic strokeTirofibanModified Rankin scaleMortality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chunrong Tao
Yuyou Zhu
Chao Zhang
Jianlong Song
Tianlong Liu
Xiaodong Yuan
Wenwu Luo
Changchun Chen
Dezhi Liu
Yuanyuan Zhu
Jie Liu
Wei Hu
spellingShingle Chunrong Tao
Yuyou Zhu
Chao Zhang
Jianlong Song
Tianlong Liu
Xiaodong Yuan
Wenwu Luo
Changchun Chen
Dezhi Liu
Yuanyuan Zhu
Jie Liu
Wei Hu
Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke
BMC Neurology
Acute ischemic stroke
Tirofiban
Modified Rankin scale
Mortality
author_facet Chunrong Tao
Yuyou Zhu
Chao Zhang
Jianlong Song
Tianlong Liu
Xiaodong Yuan
Wenwu Luo
Changchun Chen
Dezhi Liu
Yuanyuan Zhu
Jie Liu
Wei Hu
author_sort Chunrong Tao
title Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke
title_short Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke
title_full Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke
title_fullStr Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke
title_full_unstemmed Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke
title_sort association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke
publisher BMC
series BMC Neurology
issn 1471-2377
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Background Studies have suggested that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as tirofiban are beneficial for patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, it is still uncertain about the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods In this prospective non-randomized study, 255 AIS patients were recruited from 4 comprehensive stroke centers in China between January, 2017 and May, 2018. Among them,169 patients were treated with aspirin plus clopidogrel and 86 patients were treated with tirofiban. The primary functional outcome was the distribution of the 90 days’ modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The safety outcomes included the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) at discharge and mortality at 3 months. Results In the propensity score matched cohort, tirofiban alone was noninferior to the dual antiplatelet with regard to the primary outcome (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 2.04; P = 0.93). Mortality at 90 days was 10% in the dual antiplatelet group and 8% in the tirofiban group (adjusted odds ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.08 to 7.40, p = 0.81). There was no difference of the ICH rate between two groups (adjusted odds ratio 0.44; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.48, p = 0.18). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting-propensity score-adjusted cohort, similar differences were found for functional and safety outcomes. Conclusions Our study suggested that tirofiban use appears to be safe as monotherapy in AIS treatment compared with common dual antiplatelet therapy, however, no improvement in functional outcomes was found. Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR2000034443 , 05/07/2020. Retrospectively registered.
topic Acute ischemic stroke
Tirofiban
Modified Rankin scale
Mortality
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02268-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chunrongtao associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT yuyouzhu associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT chaozhang associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT jianlongsong associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT tianlongliu associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT xiaodongyuan associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT wenwuluo associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT changchunchen associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT dezhiliu associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT yuanyuanzhu associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT jieliu associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
AT weihu associationbetweentirofibanmonotherapyandefficacyandsafetyinacuteischemicstroke
_version_ 1721357893094080512