Answered and Unanswered Questions in Early-Stage Viral Vector Transduction Biology and Innate Primary Cell Toxicity for Ex-Vivo Gene Editing
Adeno-associated virus is a highly efficient DNA delivery vehicle for genome editing strategies that employ CRISPR/Cas9 and a DNA donor for homology-directed repair. Many groups have used this strategy in development of therapies for blood and immune disorders such as sickle-cell anemia and severe-c...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Immunology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.660302/full |
id |
doaj-783dd13bc72146c3b186681d21101f01 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-783dd13bc72146c3b186681d21101f012021-05-28T14:37:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242021-05-011210.3389/fimmu.2021.660302660302Answered and Unanswered Questions in Early-Stage Viral Vector Transduction Biology and Innate Primary Cell Toxicity for Ex-Vivo Gene EditingAmanda Mary Dudek0Amanda Mary Dudek1Matthew Hebden Porteus2Matthew Hebden Porteus3Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United StatesAdeno-associated virus is a highly efficient DNA delivery vehicle for genome editing strategies that employ CRISPR/Cas9 and a DNA donor for homology-directed repair. Many groups have used this strategy in development of therapies for blood and immune disorders such as sickle-cell anemia and severe-combined immunodeficiency. However, recent events have called into question the immunogenicity of AAV as a gene therapy vector and the safety profile dictated by the immune response to this vector. The target cells dictating this response and the molecular mechanisms dictating cellular response to AAV are poorly understood. Here, we will investigate the current known AAV capsid and genome interactions with cellular proteins during early stage vector transduction and how these interactions may influence innate cellular responses. We will discuss the current understanding of innate immune activation and DNA damage response to AAV, and the limitations of what is currently known. In particular, we will focus on pathway differences in cell line verses primary cells, with a focus on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in the context of ex-vivo gene editing, and what we can learn from HSPC infection by other parvoviruses. Finally, we will discuss how innate immune and DNA damage response pathway activation in these highly sensitive stem cell populations may impact long-term engraftment and clinical outcomes as these gene-editing strategies move towards the clinic, with the aim to propose pathways relevant for improved hematopoietic stem cell survival and long-term engraftment after AAV-mediated genome editing.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.660302/fullAAV (adeno-associated virus)genome-edited cellshematopoietic stem celltoxicityhematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantationviral vector |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amanda Mary Dudek Amanda Mary Dudek Matthew Hebden Porteus Matthew Hebden Porteus |
spellingShingle |
Amanda Mary Dudek Amanda Mary Dudek Matthew Hebden Porteus Matthew Hebden Porteus Answered and Unanswered Questions in Early-Stage Viral Vector Transduction Biology and Innate Primary Cell Toxicity for Ex-Vivo Gene Editing Frontiers in Immunology AAV (adeno-associated virus) genome-edited cells hematopoietic stem cell toxicity hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation viral vector |
author_facet |
Amanda Mary Dudek Amanda Mary Dudek Matthew Hebden Porteus Matthew Hebden Porteus |
author_sort |
Amanda Mary Dudek |
title |
Answered and Unanswered Questions in Early-Stage Viral Vector Transduction Biology and Innate Primary Cell Toxicity for Ex-Vivo Gene Editing |
title_short |
Answered and Unanswered Questions in Early-Stage Viral Vector Transduction Biology and Innate Primary Cell Toxicity for Ex-Vivo Gene Editing |
title_full |
Answered and Unanswered Questions in Early-Stage Viral Vector Transduction Biology and Innate Primary Cell Toxicity for Ex-Vivo Gene Editing |
title_fullStr |
Answered and Unanswered Questions in Early-Stage Viral Vector Transduction Biology and Innate Primary Cell Toxicity for Ex-Vivo Gene Editing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Answered and Unanswered Questions in Early-Stage Viral Vector Transduction Biology and Innate Primary Cell Toxicity for Ex-Vivo Gene Editing |
title_sort |
answered and unanswered questions in early-stage viral vector transduction biology and innate primary cell toxicity for ex-vivo gene editing |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Immunology |
issn |
1664-3224 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Adeno-associated virus is a highly efficient DNA delivery vehicle for genome editing strategies that employ CRISPR/Cas9 and a DNA donor for homology-directed repair. Many groups have used this strategy in development of therapies for blood and immune disorders such as sickle-cell anemia and severe-combined immunodeficiency. However, recent events have called into question the immunogenicity of AAV as a gene therapy vector and the safety profile dictated by the immune response to this vector. The target cells dictating this response and the molecular mechanisms dictating cellular response to AAV are poorly understood. Here, we will investigate the current known AAV capsid and genome interactions with cellular proteins during early stage vector transduction and how these interactions may influence innate cellular responses. We will discuss the current understanding of innate immune activation and DNA damage response to AAV, and the limitations of what is currently known. In particular, we will focus on pathway differences in cell line verses primary cells, with a focus on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in the context of ex-vivo gene editing, and what we can learn from HSPC infection by other parvoviruses. Finally, we will discuss how innate immune and DNA damage response pathway activation in these highly sensitive stem cell populations may impact long-term engraftment and clinical outcomes as these gene-editing strategies move towards the clinic, with the aim to propose pathways relevant for improved hematopoietic stem cell survival and long-term engraftment after AAV-mediated genome editing. |
topic |
AAV (adeno-associated virus) genome-edited cells hematopoietic stem cell toxicity hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation viral vector |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.660302/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amandamarydudek answeredandunansweredquestionsinearlystageviralvectortransductionbiologyandinnateprimarycelltoxicityforexvivogeneediting AT amandamarydudek answeredandunansweredquestionsinearlystageviralvectortransductionbiologyandinnateprimarycelltoxicityforexvivogeneediting AT matthewhebdenporteus answeredandunansweredquestionsinearlystageviralvectortransductionbiologyandinnateprimarycelltoxicityforexvivogeneediting AT matthewhebdenporteus answeredandunansweredquestionsinearlystageviralvectortransductionbiologyandinnateprimarycelltoxicityforexvivogeneediting |
_version_ |
1721423465070723072 |