The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve
The difficulty, inconvenience or contrariety on the origin of the human knowledge is an epistemological problem which can have more of an intention of solution. This inconvenience is sought to remedy or amend-with knowledge or ignorance of the fact-using different philosophical assumptions (ration...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Asociación Latinoamericana de Filosofía de la Educación
2017-11-01
|
Series: | IXTLI |
Online Access: | http://ixtli.org/revista/index.php/ixtli/article/view/84 |
id |
doaj-7832b90d680d47f08e769ecfcac94b39 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7832b90d680d47f08e769ecfcac94b392020-11-24T21:39:02ZengAsociación Latinoamericana de Filosofía de la EducaciónIXTLI2408-47512017-11-014816519283The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solveJosé Nava Bedolla0Instituto Superior de Ciencias de la Educación del Estado de MéxicoThe difficulty, inconvenience or contrariety on the origin of the human knowledge is an epistemological problem which can have more of an intention of solution. This inconvenience is sought to remedy or amend-with knowledge or ignorance of the fact-using different philosophical assumptions (rationalism, empiricism, intellectualism or Apriorismo). These assumptions, estimations or epistemological conjectures depend – in turn-of the faculty or faculties (the reason and/or the senses) that the subject cognoscente put in practice when it pretends to know certain phenomenon. The faculty or faculties (reason and/or senses) that the subject puts into play, when it pretends to problematize an object of study, will depend or depend, in turn, on the ontological interests of the investigator. Such interests, haves or benefits refer-in the ontological, existing or real field-to seek to put order in the context, situation or environment (rationalism), Chaos (empiricism) or intermittent states between Order and chaos (intellectualism or Apriorismo).http://ixtli.org/revista/index.php/ixtli/article/view/84 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
José Nava Bedolla |
spellingShingle |
José Nava Bedolla The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve IXTLI |
author_facet |
José Nava Bedolla |
author_sort |
José Nava Bedolla |
title |
The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve |
title_short |
The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve |
title_full |
The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve |
title_fullStr |
The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve |
title_full_unstemmed |
The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve |
title_sort |
problem of the origin of human knowledge. the philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve |
publisher |
Asociación Latinoamericana de Filosofía de la Educación |
series |
IXTLI |
issn |
2408-4751 |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
The difficulty, inconvenience or contrariety on the origin of the human knowledge is an epistemological problem which can have more of an intention of solution.
This inconvenience is sought to remedy or amend-with knowledge or ignorance of the fact-using different philosophical assumptions (rationalism, empiricism, intellectualism or Apriorismo).
These assumptions, estimations or epistemological conjectures depend – in turn-of the faculty or faculties (the reason and/or the senses) that the subject cognoscente put in practice when it pretends to know certain phenomenon.
The faculty or faculties (reason and/or senses) that the subject puts into play, when it pretends to problematize an object of study, will depend or depend, in turn, on the ontological interests of the investigator.
Such interests, haves or benefits refer-in the ontological, existing or real field-to seek to put order in the context, situation or environment (rationalism), Chaos (empiricism) or intermittent states between Order and chaos (intellectualism or Apriorismo). |
url |
http://ixtli.org/revista/index.php/ixtli/article/view/84 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT josenavabedolla theproblemoftheoriginofhumanknowledgethephilosophicalassumptionswithwhichitisintendedtosolve AT josenavabedolla problemoftheoriginofhumanknowledgethephilosophicalassumptionswithwhichitisintendedtosolve |
_version_ |
1725933056857997312 |