The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve

The difficulty, inconvenience or contrariety on the origin of the human knowledge is an epistemological problem which can have more of an intention of solution.  This inconvenience is sought to remedy or amend-with knowledge or ignorance of the fact-using different philosophical assumptions (ration...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: José Nava Bedolla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asociación Latinoamericana de Filosofía de la Educación 2017-11-01
Series:IXTLI
Online Access:http://ixtli.org/revista/index.php/ixtli/article/view/84
id doaj-7832b90d680d47f08e769ecfcac94b39
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7832b90d680d47f08e769ecfcac94b392020-11-24T21:39:02ZengAsociación Latinoamericana de Filosofía de la EducaciónIXTLI2408-47512017-11-014816519283The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solveJosé Nava Bedolla0Instituto Superior de Ciencias de la Educación del Estado de MéxicoThe difficulty, inconvenience or contrariety on the origin of the human knowledge is an epistemological problem which can have more of an intention of solution.  This inconvenience is sought to remedy or amend-with knowledge or ignorance of the fact-using different philosophical assumptions (rationalism, empiricism, intellectualism or Apriorismo).  These assumptions, estimations or epistemological conjectures depend – in turn-of the faculty or faculties (the reason and/or the senses) that the subject cognoscente put in practice when it pretends to know certain phenomenon. The faculty or faculties (reason and/or senses) that the subject puts into play, when it pretends to problematize an object of study, will depend or depend, in turn, on the ontological interests of the investigator.  Such interests, haves or benefits refer-in the ontological, existing or real field-to seek to put order in the context, situation or environment (rationalism), Chaos (empiricism) or intermittent states between Order and chaos (intellectualism or Apriorismo).http://ixtli.org/revista/index.php/ixtli/article/view/84
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author José Nava Bedolla
spellingShingle José Nava Bedolla
The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve
IXTLI
author_facet José Nava Bedolla
author_sort José Nava Bedolla
title The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve
title_short The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve
title_full The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve
title_fullStr The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve
title_full_unstemmed The problem of the origin of human knowledge. The philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve
title_sort problem of the origin of human knowledge. the philosophical assumptions with which it is intended to solve
publisher Asociación Latinoamericana de Filosofía de la Educación
series IXTLI
issn 2408-4751
publishDate 2017-11-01
description The difficulty, inconvenience or contrariety on the origin of the human knowledge is an epistemological problem which can have more of an intention of solution.  This inconvenience is sought to remedy or amend-with knowledge or ignorance of the fact-using different philosophical assumptions (rationalism, empiricism, intellectualism or Apriorismo).  These assumptions, estimations or epistemological conjectures depend – in turn-of the faculty or faculties (the reason and/or the senses) that the subject cognoscente put in practice when it pretends to know certain phenomenon. The faculty or faculties (reason and/or senses) that the subject puts into play, when it pretends to problematize an object of study, will depend or depend, in turn, on the ontological interests of the investigator.  Such interests, haves or benefits refer-in the ontological, existing or real field-to seek to put order in the context, situation or environment (rationalism), Chaos (empiricism) or intermittent states between Order and chaos (intellectualism or Apriorismo).
url http://ixtli.org/revista/index.php/ixtli/article/view/84
work_keys_str_mv AT josenavabedolla theproblemoftheoriginofhumanknowledgethephilosophicalassumptionswithwhichitisintendedtosolve
AT josenavabedolla problemoftheoriginofhumanknowledgethephilosophicalassumptionswithwhichitisintendedtosolve
_version_ 1725933056857997312