A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor?
Abstract Altmetrics measure the digital attention received by a research output. They allow us to gauge the immediate social impact of an article by taking real-time measurements of how it circulates in the Internet. While there are several companies offering attention scores, the most extensive are...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Insights into Imaging |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01033-2 |
id |
doaj-78263a9454f747b3a7e063963a25e81c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-78263a9454f747b3a7e063963a25e81c2021-07-04T11:11:52ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012021-07-0112111010.1186/s13244-021-01033-2A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor?Cristina García-Villar0Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta del MarAbstract Altmetrics measure the digital attention received by a research output. They allow us to gauge the immediate social impact of an article by taking real-time measurements of how it circulates in the Internet. While there are several companies offering attention scores, the most extensive are Altmetric.com (Altmetric Attention Score—AAS) and Plum X (Plum Print). As this is an emerging topic, many medical specialities have tried to establish if there is a relationship between an article’s altmetric data and the citations it subsequently receives. The results have varied depending on the research field. In radiology, the social network most used is Twitter and the subspeciality with the highest AAS is neuroimaging. This article will review the process involved from the start when an article is published through to finally obtaining its altmetric score. It will also address the relationship between altmetrics and more traditional approaches focusing on citations in radiology and will discuss the advantages and limitations of these new impact indicators.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01033-2AltmetricsBibliometric indicatorsRadiologyMedical imagingSocial media |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cristina García-Villar |
spellingShingle |
Cristina García-Villar A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor? Insights into Imaging Altmetrics Bibliometric indicators Radiology Medical imaging Social media |
author_facet |
Cristina García-Villar |
author_sort |
Cristina García-Villar |
title |
A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor? |
title_short |
A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor? |
title_full |
A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor? |
title_fullStr |
A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor? |
title_full_unstemmed |
A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor? |
title_sort |
critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor? |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Insights into Imaging |
issn |
1869-4101 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Altmetrics measure the digital attention received by a research output. They allow us to gauge the immediate social impact of an article by taking real-time measurements of how it circulates in the Internet. While there are several companies offering attention scores, the most extensive are Altmetric.com (Altmetric Attention Score—AAS) and Plum X (Plum Print). As this is an emerging topic, many medical specialities have tried to establish if there is a relationship between an article’s altmetric data and the citations it subsequently receives. The results have varied depending on the research field. In radiology, the social network most used is Twitter and the subspeciality with the highest AAS is neuroimaging. This article will review the process involved from the start when an article is published through to finally obtaining its altmetric score. It will also address the relationship between altmetrics and more traditional approaches focusing on citations in radiology and will discuss the advantages and limitations of these new impact indicators. |
topic |
Altmetrics Bibliometric indicators Radiology Medical imaging Social media |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01033-2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cristinagarciavillar acriticalreviewonaltmetricscanwemeasurethesocialimpactfactor AT cristinagarciavillar criticalreviewonaltmetricscanwemeasurethesocialimpactfactor |
_version_ |
1721320531326664704 |