Functional Resilience and Response to a Dietary Additive (Kefir) in Models of Foregut and Hindgut Microbial Fermentation In Vitro

Stability in gut ecosystems is an important area of study that impacts on the use of additives and is related with several pathologies. Kefir is a fermented milk drink made with a consortium of yeast and bacteria as a fermentation starter, of which the use as additive in companion and livestock anim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel de la Fuente, Eleanor Jones, Shann Jones, Charles J. Newbold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01194/full
id doaj-7824c5c671544ff4b31e4c08f9271fa4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7824c5c671544ff4b31e4c08f9271fa42020-11-24T20:49:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2017-06-01810.3389/fmicb.2017.01194249653Functional Resilience and Response to a Dietary Additive (Kefir) in Models of Foregut and Hindgut Microbial Fermentation In VitroGabriel de la Fuente0Gabriel de la Fuente1Eleanor Jones2Shann Jones3Charles J. Newbold4Departament de Ciència Animal, Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria Agrària, Universitat de LleidaLleida, SpainInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth UniversityAberystwyth, United KingdomInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth UniversityAberystwyth, United KingdomChuckling Goat LtdLlandysul, United KingdomInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth UniversityAberystwyth, United KingdomStability in gut ecosystems is an important area of study that impacts on the use of additives and is related with several pathologies. Kefir is a fermented milk drink made with a consortium of yeast and bacteria as a fermentation starter, of which the use as additive in companion and livestock animals has increased in the last few years. To investigate the effect of kefir milk on foregut and hindgut digestive systems, an in vitro approach was followed. Either rumen fluid or horse fecal contents were used as a microbial inoculate and the inclusion of kefir (fresh, autoclaved, or pasteurized) was tested. Gas production over 72 h of incubation was recorded and pH, volatile fatty acids (VFAs), lactate and ammonia concentration as well as lactic acid (LAB) and acetic acid bacteria, and yeast total numbers were also measured. Both direct and indirect (by subtracting their respective blanks) effects were analyzed and a multivariate analysis was performed to compare foregut and hindgut fermentation models. Addition of kefir boosted the fermentation by increasing molar concentration of VFAs and ammonia and shifting the Acetate to Propionate ratio in both models but heat processing techniques like pasteurization or autoclaving influenced the way the kefir is fermented and reacts with the present microbiota. In terms of comparison between both models, the foregut model seems to be less affected by the inclusion of Kefir than the hindgut model. In terms of variability in the response, the hindgut model appeared to be more variable than the foregut model in the way that it reacted indirectly to the addition of different types of kefir.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01194/fullmicrobial stabilitydigestive systemgut fermentationkefirin vitro
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gabriel de la Fuente
Gabriel de la Fuente
Eleanor Jones
Shann Jones
Charles J. Newbold
spellingShingle Gabriel de la Fuente
Gabriel de la Fuente
Eleanor Jones
Shann Jones
Charles J. Newbold
Functional Resilience and Response to a Dietary Additive (Kefir) in Models of Foregut and Hindgut Microbial Fermentation In Vitro
Frontiers in Microbiology
microbial stability
digestive system
gut fermentation
kefir
in vitro
author_facet Gabriel de la Fuente
Gabriel de la Fuente
Eleanor Jones
Shann Jones
Charles J. Newbold
author_sort Gabriel de la Fuente
title Functional Resilience and Response to a Dietary Additive (Kefir) in Models of Foregut and Hindgut Microbial Fermentation In Vitro
title_short Functional Resilience and Response to a Dietary Additive (Kefir) in Models of Foregut and Hindgut Microbial Fermentation In Vitro
title_full Functional Resilience and Response to a Dietary Additive (Kefir) in Models of Foregut and Hindgut Microbial Fermentation In Vitro
title_fullStr Functional Resilience and Response to a Dietary Additive (Kefir) in Models of Foregut and Hindgut Microbial Fermentation In Vitro
title_full_unstemmed Functional Resilience and Response to a Dietary Additive (Kefir) in Models of Foregut and Hindgut Microbial Fermentation In Vitro
title_sort functional resilience and response to a dietary additive (kefir) in models of foregut and hindgut microbial fermentation in vitro
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Stability in gut ecosystems is an important area of study that impacts on the use of additives and is related with several pathologies. Kefir is a fermented milk drink made with a consortium of yeast and bacteria as a fermentation starter, of which the use as additive in companion and livestock animals has increased in the last few years. To investigate the effect of kefir milk on foregut and hindgut digestive systems, an in vitro approach was followed. Either rumen fluid or horse fecal contents were used as a microbial inoculate and the inclusion of kefir (fresh, autoclaved, or pasteurized) was tested. Gas production over 72 h of incubation was recorded and pH, volatile fatty acids (VFAs), lactate and ammonia concentration as well as lactic acid (LAB) and acetic acid bacteria, and yeast total numbers were also measured. Both direct and indirect (by subtracting their respective blanks) effects were analyzed and a multivariate analysis was performed to compare foregut and hindgut fermentation models. Addition of kefir boosted the fermentation by increasing molar concentration of VFAs and ammonia and shifting the Acetate to Propionate ratio in both models but heat processing techniques like pasteurization or autoclaving influenced the way the kefir is fermented and reacts with the present microbiota. In terms of comparison between both models, the foregut model seems to be less affected by the inclusion of Kefir than the hindgut model. In terms of variability in the response, the hindgut model appeared to be more variable than the foregut model in the way that it reacted indirectly to the addition of different types of kefir.
topic microbial stability
digestive system
gut fermentation
kefir
in vitro
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01194/full
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrieldelafuente functionalresilienceandresponsetoadietaryadditivekefirinmodelsofforegutandhindgutmicrobialfermentationinvitro
AT gabrieldelafuente functionalresilienceandresponsetoadietaryadditivekefirinmodelsofforegutandhindgutmicrobialfermentationinvitro
AT eleanorjones functionalresilienceandresponsetoadietaryadditivekefirinmodelsofforegutandhindgutmicrobialfermentationinvitro
AT shannjones functionalresilienceandresponsetoadietaryadditivekefirinmodelsofforegutandhindgutmicrobialfermentationinvitro
AT charlesjnewbold functionalresilienceandresponsetoadietaryadditivekefirinmodelsofforegutandhindgutmicrobialfermentationinvitro
_version_ 1716806047139627008