How Can We Reduce Device-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Intensive Care Units?

Introduction: We found that the rate of our catheterization-related urinary tract infections was significantly higher than the intensive care unit data that were included in the American National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS) in 2003. In this study, we aimed to reduce the rates of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haluk ERDOĞAN, Aşkın ERDOĞAN, Hande ARSLAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bilimsel Tip Yayinevi 2010-12-01
Series:Flora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.floradergisi.org/getFileContent.aspx?op=REDPDF&file_name=2010-15-4-160-164.pdf
id doaj-7819474e41844e22a52921b67b8192cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7819474e41844e22a52921b67b8192cb2020-11-25T01:30:08ZengBilimsel Tip YayineviFlora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi1300-932X1300-932X2010-12-01154160164How Can We Reduce Device-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Intensive Care Units?Haluk ERDOĞAN0Aşkın ERDOĞAN1Hande ARSLAN2Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Baskent University Alanya Hospital, Antalya, TurkeyDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Baskent University Alanya Hospital, Antalya, TurkeyDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Baskent, Ankara, TurkeyIntroduction: We found that the rate of our catheterization-related urinary tract infections was significantly higher than the intensive care unit data that were included in the American National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS) in 2003. In this study, we aimed to reduce the rates of device-associated uninary tract infections. Patients and Methods: The current study was conducted in three intensive care units with 15 beds in Baskent University Alanya Research and Application Center. The adult patients (older than 15 years of age) who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit between January 2003 and October 2005 were included in the study. NNIS criteria were used for diagnosis of nosocomial infections, and a patient-based prospective surveillance method was utilized. Infection control strategies for implementation and care of urinary catheterization were reviewed. Training was given to intensive care unit staff for implementation and care of urinary catheterization. Old-fashioned tap water faucets were replaced with electronic photocell operated new faucets for facilitating handwashing. Alcohol-based hand antiseptics were placed next to each patient; hence, more efficient use was obtained. Results: The rates of catheter use between 2003 and 2005 were 0.76, 0.76 and 0.79; catheter-associated urinary tract infections rates were 19.1, 13.6 and 4.8 per 1000 catheter days. When compared to the rates of 2003, the rates of urinary tract infections in 2005 were significantly reduced odds ratio= 4.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.5-10.6) (p= 0.004). Conclusion: Healthcare workers should be aware of the cross infections in patients with urinary catheterization. Hand hygiene, glove use and standard precautions are important in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections as well as in preventing accumulation.http://www.floradergisi.org/getFileContent.aspx?op=REDPDF&file_name=2010-15-4-160-164.pdfIntensive care unitsCross infectionUrinary tract infectionsHandwashingUniversal precautions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Haluk ERDOĞAN
Aşkın ERDOĞAN
Hande ARSLAN
spellingShingle Haluk ERDOĞAN
Aşkın ERDOĞAN
Hande ARSLAN
How Can We Reduce Device-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Intensive Care Units?
Flora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi
Intensive care units
Cross infection
Urinary tract infections
Handwashing
Universal precautions
author_facet Haluk ERDOĞAN
Aşkın ERDOĞAN
Hande ARSLAN
author_sort Haluk ERDOĞAN
title How Can We Reduce Device-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Intensive Care Units?
title_short How Can We Reduce Device-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Intensive Care Units?
title_full How Can We Reduce Device-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Intensive Care Units?
title_fullStr How Can We Reduce Device-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Intensive Care Units?
title_full_unstemmed How Can We Reduce Device-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Adult Intensive Care Units?
title_sort how can we reduce device-associated urinary tract infections in adult intensive care units?
publisher Bilimsel Tip Yayinevi
series Flora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi
issn 1300-932X
1300-932X
publishDate 2010-12-01
description Introduction: We found that the rate of our catheterization-related urinary tract infections was significantly higher than the intensive care unit data that were included in the American National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS) in 2003. In this study, we aimed to reduce the rates of device-associated uninary tract infections. Patients and Methods: The current study was conducted in three intensive care units with 15 beds in Baskent University Alanya Research and Application Center. The adult patients (older than 15 years of age) who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit between January 2003 and October 2005 were included in the study. NNIS criteria were used for diagnosis of nosocomial infections, and a patient-based prospective surveillance method was utilized. Infection control strategies for implementation and care of urinary catheterization were reviewed. Training was given to intensive care unit staff for implementation and care of urinary catheterization. Old-fashioned tap water faucets were replaced with electronic photocell operated new faucets for facilitating handwashing. Alcohol-based hand antiseptics were placed next to each patient; hence, more efficient use was obtained. Results: The rates of catheter use between 2003 and 2005 were 0.76, 0.76 and 0.79; catheter-associated urinary tract infections rates were 19.1, 13.6 and 4.8 per 1000 catheter days. When compared to the rates of 2003, the rates of urinary tract infections in 2005 were significantly reduced odds ratio= 4.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.5-10.6) (p= 0.004). Conclusion: Healthcare workers should be aware of the cross infections in patients with urinary catheterization. Hand hygiene, glove use and standard precautions are important in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections as well as in preventing accumulation.
topic Intensive care units
Cross infection
Urinary tract infections
Handwashing
Universal precautions
url http://www.floradergisi.org/getFileContent.aspx?op=REDPDF&file_name=2010-15-4-160-164.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT halukerdogan howcanwereducedeviceassociatedurinarytractinfectionsinadultintensivecareunits
AT askınerdogan howcanwereducedeviceassociatedurinarytractinfectionsinadultintensivecareunits
AT handearslan howcanwereducedeviceassociatedurinarytractinfectionsinadultintensivecareunits
_version_ 1725093377350828032