Telling Students it’s O.K. to Fail, but Showing Them it Isn’t: Dissonant Paradigms of Failure in Higher Education

Educators increasingly extol failure as a necessary component of learning and growth. However, students frequently experience failure as a source of fear and anxiety that impedes risk-taking and experimentation. This essay examines the dissonance between these generative and stigmatized paradigms o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paul Feigenbaum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2021-03-01
Series:Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/68580
id doaj-7807ad51219647adaaf0952c03691259
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7807ad51219647adaaf0952c036912592021-03-26T14:37:22ZengUniversity of CalgaryTeaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal2167-47792167-47872021-03-019110.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.3Telling Students it’s O.K. to Fail, but Showing Them it Isn’t: Dissonant Paradigms of Failure in Higher EducationPaul Feigenbaum0Florida International University Educators increasingly extol failure as a necessary component of learning and growth. However, students frequently experience failure as a source of fear and anxiety that impedes risk-taking and experimentation. This essay examines the dissonance between these generative and stigmatized paradigms of failure, and it offers ideas for better negotiating this dissonance. After conceptualizing the two paradigms, I examine various factors that reinforce failure’s stigmatization. I emphasize precarious meritocracy, a neoliberal ethos driven by hypercompetitive individualism that makes success a zero-sum game, and that causes especially significant harms on students who are already socially stigmatized. Efforts to ameliorate paradigm dissonance tend to focus on changing student dispositions or lowering the stakes of failure. I instead propose wise interventions that include analyzing the systemic roots of stigmatized failure and making failure a more communal experience. I then briefly address the systemic transformations necessary to cultivate generative failure more broadly. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/68580generative failurestigmatized failuremeritocracyprecaritywise interventions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul Feigenbaum
spellingShingle Paul Feigenbaum
Telling Students it’s O.K. to Fail, but Showing Them it Isn’t: Dissonant Paradigms of Failure in Higher Education
Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
generative failure
stigmatized failure
meritocracy
precarity
wise interventions
author_facet Paul Feigenbaum
author_sort Paul Feigenbaum
title Telling Students it’s O.K. to Fail, but Showing Them it Isn’t: Dissonant Paradigms of Failure in Higher Education
title_short Telling Students it’s O.K. to Fail, but Showing Them it Isn’t: Dissonant Paradigms of Failure in Higher Education
title_full Telling Students it’s O.K. to Fail, but Showing Them it Isn’t: Dissonant Paradigms of Failure in Higher Education
title_fullStr Telling Students it’s O.K. to Fail, but Showing Them it Isn’t: Dissonant Paradigms of Failure in Higher Education
title_full_unstemmed Telling Students it’s O.K. to Fail, but Showing Them it Isn’t: Dissonant Paradigms of Failure in Higher Education
title_sort telling students it’s o.k. to fail, but showing them it isn’t: dissonant paradigms of failure in higher education
publisher University of Calgary
series Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
issn 2167-4779
2167-4787
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Educators increasingly extol failure as a necessary component of learning and growth. However, students frequently experience failure as a source of fear and anxiety that impedes risk-taking and experimentation. This essay examines the dissonance between these generative and stigmatized paradigms of failure, and it offers ideas for better negotiating this dissonance. After conceptualizing the two paradigms, I examine various factors that reinforce failure’s stigmatization. I emphasize precarious meritocracy, a neoliberal ethos driven by hypercompetitive individualism that makes success a zero-sum game, and that causes especially significant harms on students who are already socially stigmatized. Efforts to ameliorate paradigm dissonance tend to focus on changing student dispositions or lowering the stakes of failure. I instead propose wise interventions that include analyzing the systemic roots of stigmatized failure and making failure a more communal experience. I then briefly address the systemic transformations necessary to cultivate generative failure more broadly.
topic generative failure
stigmatized failure
meritocracy
precarity
wise interventions
url https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/68580
work_keys_str_mv AT paulfeigenbaum tellingstudentsitsoktofailbutshowingthemitisntdissonantparadigmsoffailureinhighereducation
_version_ 1724202042052837376