Organizational self-assessment based on ISO 9004:2009 standard: perceptions, comparisons, questions and actions
The self-assessment basedon Annex A of the ISO 9004:2009 standard is a very practical diagnostic tool and also very powerful for capturing the image of the organization quickly. It enables to have answers to questions suchas: what are the strengths and weakness of our organization? Do we have adequa...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Santo Tomás
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Signos |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/signos/article/view/1945 |
id |
doaj-77f364a67fce4cb7a3f1dc0923b0cc8f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-77f364a67fce4cb7a3f1dc0923b0cc8f2020-11-25T00:53:12ZspaUniversidad Santo TomásSignos 2145-13892463-11402013-01-015110512010.15332/s2145-1389.2013.0001.061821Organizational self-assessment based on ISO 9004:2009 standard: perceptions, comparisons, questions and actionsBob AlisicThe self-assessment basedon Annex A of the ISO 9004:2009 standard is a very practical diagnostic tool and also very powerful for capturing the image of the organization quickly. It enables to have answers to questions suchas: what are the strengths and weakness of our organization? Do we have adequate processes, resources and competencies to reach our vision and goals? Are we measuring the parameters of importance or not? Do we communicate results adequately? Do we establish priorities to improve that which is aligned with the strategy? On the other hand, like any tool, it has a series of limitations: perceptions of the various members of the organization canbe very different; average score can possibly say very little about the actual situation of the organization, without a careful and open discussion about the extreme perceptions. From the results of 170 self-assessments made by organizations in Holland basedon ISO 9004:2009, some initial conclusions are reached about the application of self-assessment, analyzing the highest and lowest scores achieved. Finally, a series of suggestions and advices are made onhow to prepare, execute and close a self-assessment act.https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/signos/article/view/1945autoevaluaciónéxito sostenidosistemas de gestión de la calidadISO 9004ISO 9001 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bob Alisic |
spellingShingle |
Bob Alisic Organizational self-assessment based on ISO 9004:2009 standard: perceptions, comparisons, questions and actions Signos autoevaluación éxito sostenido sistemas de gestión de la calidad ISO 9004 ISO 9001 |
author_facet |
Bob Alisic |
author_sort |
Bob Alisic |
title |
Organizational self-assessment based on ISO 9004:2009 standard: perceptions, comparisons, questions and actions |
title_short |
Organizational self-assessment based on ISO 9004:2009 standard: perceptions, comparisons, questions and actions |
title_full |
Organizational self-assessment based on ISO 9004:2009 standard: perceptions, comparisons, questions and actions |
title_fullStr |
Organizational self-assessment based on ISO 9004:2009 standard: perceptions, comparisons, questions and actions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organizational self-assessment based on ISO 9004:2009 standard: perceptions, comparisons, questions and actions |
title_sort |
organizational self-assessment based on iso 9004:2009 standard: perceptions, comparisons, questions and actions |
publisher |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
series |
Signos |
issn |
2145-1389 2463-1140 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
The self-assessment basedon Annex A of the ISO 9004:2009 standard is a very practical diagnostic tool and also very powerful for capturing the image of the organization quickly. It enables to have answers to questions suchas: what are the strengths and weakness of our organization? Do we have adequate processes, resources and competencies to reach our vision and goals? Are we measuring the parameters of importance or not? Do we communicate results adequately? Do we establish priorities to improve that which is aligned with the strategy?
On the other hand, like any tool, it has a series of limitations: perceptions of the various members of the organization canbe very different; average score can possibly say very little about the actual situation of the organization, without a careful and open discussion about the extreme perceptions.
From the results of 170 self-assessments made by organizations in Holland basedon ISO 9004:2009, some initial conclusions are reached about the application of self-assessment, analyzing the highest and lowest scores achieved.
Finally, a series of suggestions and advices are made onhow to prepare, execute and close a self-assessment act. |
topic |
autoevaluación éxito sostenido sistemas de gestión de la calidad ISO 9004 ISO 9001 |
url |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/signos/article/view/1945 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bobalisic organizationalselfassessmentbasedoniso90042009standardperceptionscomparisonsquestionsandactions |
_version_ |
1725238831641264128 |