The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control

In the automatic imitation task (AIT) participants make a cued response during simultaneous exposure to a congruent or incongruent action made by another agent. Participants are slower to make the cued response on incongruent trials, which is thought to reflect conflict between the motor representat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sukhvinder S. Obhi, Jeremy Hogeveen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2013-09-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/161.pdf
id doaj-77ef7db943b04e3d99d870bd68e58eb3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-77ef7db943b04e3d99d870bd68e58eb32020-11-24T22:07:29ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592013-09-011e16110.7717/peerj.161161The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other controlSukhvinder S. Obhi0Jeremy Hogeveen1Social Brain, Body & Action Lab, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience & Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaSocial Brain, Body & Action Lab, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience & Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaIn the automatic imitation task (AIT) participants make a cued response during simultaneous exposure to a congruent or incongruent action made by another agent. Participants are slower to make the cued response on incongruent trials, which is thought to reflect conflict between the motor representation activated by the cue and the motor representation activated by the observed action. On incongruent trials, good performance requires the capacity to suppress the imitative action, in favor of producing the cued response. Here, we introduce a new experimental paradigm that complements the AIT, and is therefore a useful task for studying the control of self and other activated representations. In what we term the “Controlled Imitation Task (CIT)”, participants are cued to make an action, but on 50% of trials, within 100 ms of this cue, an on-screen hand makes a congruent or incongruent action. If the onscreen hand moves, the participant must suppress the cued response, and instead imitate the observed action as quickly and accurately as possible. In direct contrast to the AIT, the CIT requires suppression of a self-activated motor representation, and prioritization of an imitative response. In experiment 1, we report a robust pattern of interference effects in the CIT, such that participants are slower to make the imitative response on incongruent compared to congruent trials. In experiment 2, we replicate this effect while including a non-imitative spatial-cue control condition to show that the effect is particularly robust for imitative response tendencies per se. Owing to the essentially opposite control requirements of the CIT versus the AIT (i.e., suppression of self-activated motor representations instead of suppression of other-activated motor representations), we propose that this new task is a potentially informative complementary paradigm to the AIT that can be used in studies of self-other control processes.https://peerj.com/articles/161.pdfImitationAutomatic imitationControlled imitationMirror systemMotor resonanceAutomatic imitation Task
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sukhvinder S. Obhi
Jeremy Hogeveen
spellingShingle Sukhvinder S. Obhi
Jeremy Hogeveen
The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control
PeerJ
Imitation
Automatic imitation
Controlled imitation
Mirror system
Motor resonance
Automatic imitation Task
author_facet Sukhvinder S. Obhi
Jeremy Hogeveen
author_sort Sukhvinder S. Obhi
title The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control
title_short The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control
title_full The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control
title_fullStr The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control
title_full_unstemmed The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control
title_sort controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2013-09-01
description In the automatic imitation task (AIT) participants make a cued response during simultaneous exposure to a congruent or incongruent action made by another agent. Participants are slower to make the cued response on incongruent trials, which is thought to reflect conflict between the motor representation activated by the cue and the motor representation activated by the observed action. On incongruent trials, good performance requires the capacity to suppress the imitative action, in favor of producing the cued response. Here, we introduce a new experimental paradigm that complements the AIT, and is therefore a useful task for studying the control of self and other activated representations. In what we term the “Controlled Imitation Task (CIT)”, participants are cued to make an action, but on 50% of trials, within 100 ms of this cue, an on-screen hand makes a congruent or incongruent action. If the onscreen hand moves, the participant must suppress the cued response, and instead imitate the observed action as quickly and accurately as possible. In direct contrast to the AIT, the CIT requires suppression of a self-activated motor representation, and prioritization of an imitative response. In experiment 1, we report a robust pattern of interference effects in the CIT, such that participants are slower to make the imitative response on incongruent compared to congruent trials. In experiment 2, we replicate this effect while including a non-imitative spatial-cue control condition to show that the effect is particularly robust for imitative response tendencies per se. Owing to the essentially opposite control requirements of the CIT versus the AIT (i.e., suppression of self-activated motor representations instead of suppression of other-activated motor representations), we propose that this new task is a potentially informative complementary paradigm to the AIT that can be used in studies of self-other control processes.
topic Imitation
Automatic imitation
Controlled imitation
Mirror system
Motor resonance
Automatic imitation Task
url https://peerj.com/articles/161.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sukhvindersobhi thecontrolledimitationtaskanewparadigmforstudyingselfothercontrol
AT jeremyhogeveen thecontrolledimitationtaskanewparadigmforstudyingselfothercontrol
AT sukhvindersobhi controlledimitationtaskanewparadigmforstudyingselfothercontrol
AT jeremyhogeveen controlledimitationtaskanewparadigmforstudyingselfothercontrol
_version_ 1725820179553714176