Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?

Introduction: Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. Mate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aditya Prakash Sharma, Tushar Aditya Narain, Sudheer Kumar Devana, Shantanu Tyagi, Kalpesh M Parmar, Girdhar Singh Bora, Ravimohan S Mavuduru, Shrawan Kumar Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Online Access:http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2020;volume=36;issue=2;spage=117;epage=122;aulast=Sharma
id doaj-77ebdc1ae89d4a22a2891bd7d4ebe3d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-77ebdc1ae89d4a22a2891bd7d4ebe3d92020-11-25T02:28:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15912020-01-0136211712210.4103/iju.IJU_333_19Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?Aditya Prakash SharmaTushar Aditya NarainSudheer Kumar DevanaShantanu TyagiKalpesh M ParmarGirdhar Singh BoraRavimohan S MavuduruShrawan Kumar SinghIntroduction: Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: Ambispective observational study was undertaken from July 2002 to August 2019 which included patients admitted with a history of trauma to the penis in the erect state. The clinical presentation, etiology and the details of the surgical management were noted. Patients were contacted telephonically and were called for follow-up. They were evaluated for the presence of penile nodules or curvature, and the erectile function was objectively recorded using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). Results: Median age at injury was 37 years, and injury during the sexual intercourse (33/43) was the most common etiology. Five patients presented with blood at the meatus. Ultrasound was performed in 27 patients and could detect the injury with a 55% sensitivity. All but one case were repaired through a subcoronal degloving incision. At a median follow-up of 36 months, follow-up data of 20 patients were available. Of the 20 patients, 14 were sexually active. The mean SHIM score was 21.36 ± 1.33 and the mean EHS was 3.21 ± 0.43. Four of the 20 patients developed penile nodule while 2 of them had penile curvature which was not bothersome. Conclusion: Penile fracture remains primarily a clinical diagnosis. Although prompt diagnosis and an emergent surgical exploration provides good outcomes in terms of preservation of erectile function, patients should be apprised about the problems of penile nodule and curvature.http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2020;volume=36;issue=2;spage=117;epage=122;aulast=Sharma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aditya Prakash Sharma
Tushar Aditya Narain
Sudheer Kumar Devana
Shantanu Tyagi
Kalpesh M Parmar
Girdhar Singh Bora
Ravimohan S Mavuduru
Shrawan Kumar Singh
spellingShingle Aditya Prakash Sharma
Tushar Aditya Narain
Sudheer Kumar Devana
Shantanu Tyagi
Kalpesh M Parmar
Girdhar Singh Bora
Ravimohan S Mavuduru
Shrawan Kumar Singh
Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
Indian Journal of Urology
author_facet Aditya Prakash Sharma
Tushar Aditya Narain
Sudheer Kumar Devana
Shantanu Tyagi
Kalpesh M Parmar
Girdhar Singh Bora
Ravimohan S Mavuduru
Shrawan Kumar Singh
author_sort Aditya Prakash Sharma
title Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title_short Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title_full Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title_fullStr Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title_full_unstemmed Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title_sort clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: is no news good news?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Urology
issn 0970-1591
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Introduction: Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: Ambispective observational study was undertaken from July 2002 to August 2019 which included patients admitted with a history of trauma to the penis in the erect state. The clinical presentation, etiology and the details of the surgical management were noted. Patients were contacted telephonically and were called for follow-up. They were evaluated for the presence of penile nodules or curvature, and the erectile function was objectively recorded using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). Results: Median age at injury was 37 years, and injury during the sexual intercourse (33/43) was the most common etiology. Five patients presented with blood at the meatus. Ultrasound was performed in 27 patients and could detect the injury with a 55% sensitivity. All but one case were repaired through a subcoronal degloving incision. At a median follow-up of 36 months, follow-up data of 20 patients were available. Of the 20 patients, 14 were sexually active. The mean SHIM score was 21.36 ± 1.33 and the mean EHS was 3.21 ± 0.43. Four of the 20 patients developed penile nodule while 2 of them had penile curvature which was not bothersome. Conclusion: Penile fracture remains primarily a clinical diagnosis. Although prompt diagnosis and an emergent surgical exploration provides good outcomes in terms of preservation of erectile function, patients should be apprised about the problems of penile nodule and curvature.
url http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2020;volume=36;issue=2;spage=117;epage=122;aulast=Sharma
work_keys_str_mv AT adityaprakashsharma clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT tusharadityanarain clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT sudheerkumardevana clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT shantanutyagi clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT kalpeshmparmar clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT girdharsinghbora clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT ravimohansmavuduru clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT shrawankumarsingh clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
_version_ 1724838338285797376