METRICS FROM THE FIELD: Two New Tools for Measuring Economic Impacts

First paragraphs: Two new publications are appearing this year that should help shed new light on the ongoing discussion of how we measure the economic impacts of community-based foods initiatives. One offers critical insight, while the second is a very practical guide to compiling an economic case...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ken Meter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems 2016-10-01
Series:Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/342
id doaj-77e0699fc31043328da2093bb5f6b428
record_format Article
spelling doaj-77e0699fc31043328da2093bb5f6b4282020-11-25T02:57:25ZengThomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food SystemsJournal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development2152-08012016-10-015310.5304/jafscd.2015.053.010342METRICS FROM THE FIELD: Two New Tools for Measuring Economic ImpactsKen Meter0Crossroads Resource Center First paragraphs: Two new publications are appearing this year that should help shed new light on the ongoing discussion of how we measure the economic impacts of community-based foods initiatives. One offers critical insight, while the second is a very practical guide to compiling an economic case for local foods work. I've helped write both. The critical analysis is an outgrowth of a column I wrote for this journal in January 2011 (Meter, 2011) in which I discussed economic multipliers. I argued that economic impact analyses often are not as useful as they are perceived to be, because the data used in calculating impacts is not as precise as users think it is. Moreover, I found that many local foods initiatives do not lend themselves to analysis through the industry standard software, IMPLAN, because local foods activity is relatively small in comparison with the scale of the databases that the software relies upon. While IMPLAN can be a powerful tool when used in the right manner, I argued that in their early stages for many community foods efforts, measuring the multiplier is not the best use of one's money. Rather, building new social and commercial linkages, and deepening established ones, within the community will help build the multiplier—which after all is one of the ultimate goals of community-based food activity. This might be a higher priority than generating a multiplier measurement.... https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/342Economic ImpactMultipliersSocial NetworksSocial CapitalInput/Output AnalysisLocal Economics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ken Meter
spellingShingle Ken Meter
METRICS FROM THE FIELD: Two New Tools for Measuring Economic Impacts
Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Economic Impact
Multipliers
Social Networks
Social Capital
Input/Output Analysis
Local Economics
author_facet Ken Meter
author_sort Ken Meter
title METRICS FROM THE FIELD: Two New Tools for Measuring Economic Impacts
title_short METRICS FROM THE FIELD: Two New Tools for Measuring Economic Impacts
title_full METRICS FROM THE FIELD: Two New Tools for Measuring Economic Impacts
title_fullStr METRICS FROM THE FIELD: Two New Tools for Measuring Economic Impacts
title_full_unstemmed METRICS FROM THE FIELD: Two New Tools for Measuring Economic Impacts
title_sort metrics from the field: two new tools for measuring economic impacts
publisher Thomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
series Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
issn 2152-0801
publishDate 2016-10-01
description First paragraphs: Two new publications are appearing this year that should help shed new light on the ongoing discussion of how we measure the economic impacts of community-based foods initiatives. One offers critical insight, while the second is a very practical guide to compiling an economic case for local foods work. I've helped write both. The critical analysis is an outgrowth of a column I wrote for this journal in January 2011 (Meter, 2011) in which I discussed economic multipliers. I argued that economic impact analyses often are not as useful as they are perceived to be, because the data used in calculating impacts is not as precise as users think it is. Moreover, I found that many local foods initiatives do not lend themselves to analysis through the industry standard software, IMPLAN, because local foods activity is relatively small in comparison with the scale of the databases that the software relies upon. While IMPLAN can be a powerful tool when used in the right manner, I argued that in their early stages for many community foods efforts, measuring the multiplier is not the best use of one's money. Rather, building new social and commercial linkages, and deepening established ones, within the community will help build the multiplier—which after all is one of the ultimate goals of community-based food activity. This might be a higher priority than generating a multiplier measurement....
topic Economic Impact
Multipliers
Social Networks
Social Capital
Input/Output Analysis
Local Economics
url https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/342
work_keys_str_mv AT kenmeter metricsfromthefieldtwonewtoolsformeasuringeconomicimpacts
_version_ 1724711342450933760