Predicting Public Attitudes Toward Gene Editing of Germlines: The Impact of Moral and Hereditary Concern in Human and Animal Applications
Background and Objective: New and more efficient methods of gene editing have intensified the ethical and legal issues associated with editing germlines. Yet no research has separated the impact of hereditary concern on public attitudes from moral concern. This research compares the impact these two...
Main Authors: | Christine Critchley, Dianne Nicol, Gordana Bruce, Jarrod Walshe, Tamara Treleaven, Bernard Tuch |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Genetics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2018.00704/full |
Similar Items
-
CRISPR-Cas9 Germline Editing: Full Steam Ahead to Revolutionary Profit or Revolutionary Public Medicine?
by: Yuka Sai
Published: (2018-11-01) -
The Dubious Benefits of Germline Editing
by: Jennifer Gumer
Published: (2018-09-01) -
CRISPR-Cas and Its Wide-Ranging Applications: From Human Genome Editing to Environmental Implications, Technical Limitations, Hazards and Bioethical Issues
by: Roberto Piergentili, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Human germline interventions – think first
by: Elisabeth eHildt
Published: (2016-05-01) -
Gene editing in translational research
by: Marc Güell
Published: (2019-11-01)