Technology’s Impact on SLA: A Response to Bhatia and Ritchie (2009)

Bhatia and Ritchie (2009) focus on the positive impact of technology, specifically “the potential and promise of technology in shaping and reshaping the direction of research on SLA and in providing a potential testing ground for current theories of SLA” (p. 545). Their enthusiastic assessment, subs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrew Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia University Libraries 2011-12-01
Series:Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL
Online Access:https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1392
id doaj-77ccad2c77e342e7af9fd5b9239d063d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-77ccad2c77e342e7af9fd5b9239d063d2020-11-25T02:31:42ZengColumbia University LibrariesStudies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL2689-193X2011-12-0111210.7916/salt.v11i2.1392Technology’s Impact on SLA: A Response to Bhatia and Ritchie (2009)Andrew MillerBhatia and Ritchie (2009) focus on the positive impact of technology, specifically “the potential and promise of technology in shaping and reshaping the direction of research on SLA and in providing a potential testing ground for current theories of SLA” (p. 545). Their enthusiastic assessment, subsequently elaborated from the perspectives of users and researchers, seems intuitively relevant in this age. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge technology’s limitations in language education. For example, Bhatia and Ritchie (2009) accurately observe that the emergence of technology is responsible for “the democratization of language teaching” (p. 547) to the degree that it facilitates exposure both to less commonly taught languages (LCTLs) and to almost never taught languages (ANTLs). This democratization emerges as problematic for researchers in that it generates a level of participant assimilation within a technology-driven learning space that tends to obscure not only important inter-learner differences, but also the differential effects on acquisition of technology. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1392
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Miller
spellingShingle Andrew Miller
Technology’s Impact on SLA: A Response to Bhatia and Ritchie (2009)
Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL
author_facet Andrew Miller
author_sort Andrew Miller
title Technology’s Impact on SLA: A Response to Bhatia and Ritchie (2009)
title_short Technology’s Impact on SLA: A Response to Bhatia and Ritchie (2009)
title_full Technology’s Impact on SLA: A Response to Bhatia and Ritchie (2009)
title_fullStr Technology’s Impact on SLA: A Response to Bhatia and Ritchie (2009)
title_full_unstemmed Technology’s Impact on SLA: A Response to Bhatia and Ritchie (2009)
title_sort technology’s impact on sla: a response to bhatia and ritchie (2009)
publisher Columbia University Libraries
series Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL
issn 2689-193X
publishDate 2011-12-01
description Bhatia and Ritchie (2009) focus on the positive impact of technology, specifically “the potential and promise of technology in shaping and reshaping the direction of research on SLA and in providing a potential testing ground for current theories of SLA” (p. 545). Their enthusiastic assessment, subsequently elaborated from the perspectives of users and researchers, seems intuitively relevant in this age. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge technology’s limitations in language education. For example, Bhatia and Ritchie (2009) accurately observe that the emergence of technology is responsible for “the democratization of language teaching” (p. 547) to the degree that it facilitates exposure both to less commonly taught languages (LCTLs) and to almost never taught languages (ANTLs). This democratization emerges as problematic for researchers in that it generates a level of participant assimilation within a technology-driven learning space that tends to obscure not only important inter-learner differences, but also the differential effects on acquisition of technology.
url https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1392
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewmiller technologysimpactonslaaresponsetobhatiaandritchie2009
_version_ 1724822661066915840