Natura multimodale e creatività del linguaggio poetico

The exceptional nature of poetic language – testified by its patent untranslatability – represents a problem for philosophy, and particularly for analytic philosophy, which aims to provide an overarching explanation of ordinary language. It is difficult to explain the peculiar creativity of poetic l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Francesca Ervas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rosenberg & Sellier 2019-04-01
Series:Rivista di Estetica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/5125
id doaj-77c472b38c244f23b1be2a2dc116f3bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-77c472b38c244f23b1be2a2dc116f3bd2020-11-25T01:59:38ZengRosenberg & SellierRivista di Estetica0035-62122019-04-0170759110.4000/estetica.5125Natura multimodale e creatività del linguaggio poeticoFrancesca ErvasThe exceptional nature of poetic language – testified by its patent untranslatability – represents a problem for philosophy, and particularly for analytic philosophy, which aims to provide an overarching explanation of ordinary language. It is difficult to explain the peculiar creativity of poetic language, starting from a finite basic vocabulary and a finite set of rules to be used by an interpreter who has finite powers. Poetry seems indeed not to respect the semantic innocence, spreading new meanings not only according to the context, but even to the graphic and phonological form of the words. Mechanisms, such as quotation and conversational implicatures, have been used to respect semantic innocence and to show at the same time that poetic language is not deviant from the ordinary use of language. This article suggests an alternative route, “imagistic”, to account for the specific creativity of poetic language, without violating the principle of semantic innocence and without hypothesizing a discontinuity with ordinary language. Particularly referring to metaphor, it aims to show that poetic language does not convey as much further meanings, implicit in the use of literal terms, but rather images, evoked by and dependent on these terms, which could explain both poetry emergent properties and untranslatability. “Imageability” is not a feature of the “poetic word”, but rather of any word and, particularly, of concrete words. The creativity of poetic language lies in deepening the multimodal nature of concrete language, which is different from the abstract and conceptual nature of philosophical language.http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/5125semantic innocencemental imagesemergent properties
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesca Ervas
spellingShingle Francesca Ervas
Natura multimodale e creatività del linguaggio poetico
Rivista di Estetica
semantic innocence
mental images
emergent properties
author_facet Francesca Ervas
author_sort Francesca Ervas
title Natura multimodale e creatività del linguaggio poetico
title_short Natura multimodale e creatività del linguaggio poetico
title_full Natura multimodale e creatività del linguaggio poetico
title_fullStr Natura multimodale e creatività del linguaggio poetico
title_full_unstemmed Natura multimodale e creatività del linguaggio poetico
title_sort natura multimodale e creatività del linguaggio poetico
publisher Rosenberg & Sellier
series Rivista di Estetica
issn 0035-6212
publishDate 2019-04-01
description The exceptional nature of poetic language – testified by its patent untranslatability – represents a problem for philosophy, and particularly for analytic philosophy, which aims to provide an overarching explanation of ordinary language. It is difficult to explain the peculiar creativity of poetic language, starting from a finite basic vocabulary and a finite set of rules to be used by an interpreter who has finite powers. Poetry seems indeed not to respect the semantic innocence, spreading new meanings not only according to the context, but even to the graphic and phonological form of the words. Mechanisms, such as quotation and conversational implicatures, have been used to respect semantic innocence and to show at the same time that poetic language is not deviant from the ordinary use of language. This article suggests an alternative route, “imagistic”, to account for the specific creativity of poetic language, without violating the principle of semantic innocence and without hypothesizing a discontinuity with ordinary language. Particularly referring to metaphor, it aims to show that poetic language does not convey as much further meanings, implicit in the use of literal terms, but rather images, evoked by and dependent on these terms, which could explain both poetry emergent properties and untranslatability. “Imageability” is not a feature of the “poetic word”, but rather of any word and, particularly, of concrete words. The creativity of poetic language lies in deepening the multimodal nature of concrete language, which is different from the abstract and conceptual nature of philosophical language.
topic semantic innocence
mental images
emergent properties
url http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/5125
work_keys_str_mv AT francescaervas naturamultimodaleecreativitadellinguaggiopoetico
_version_ 1724963500276580352