Comparison between Linear and Branched Polyethylenimine and Reduced Graphene Oxide Coatings as a Capture Layer for Micro Resonant CO<sub>2</sub> Gas Concentration Sensors

The comparison between potential coatings for the measurement of CO<sub>2</sub> concentration through the frequency shift in micro-resonators is presented. The polymers evaluated are linear polyethylenimine, branched polyethylenimine and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) by microwave reductio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alberto Prud’homme, Frederic Nabki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/7/1824
id doaj-77bb5e1d927644d19d44f13a745e1934
record_format Article
spelling doaj-77bb5e1d927644d19d44f13a745e19342020-11-25T01:44:36ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-03-01207182410.3390/s20071824s20071824Comparison between Linear and Branched Polyethylenimine and Reduced Graphene Oxide Coatings as a Capture Layer for Micro Resonant CO<sub>2</sub> Gas Concentration SensorsAlberto Prud’homme0Frederic Nabki1Department of Electrical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, CanadaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, CanadaThe comparison between potential coatings for the measurement of CO<sub>2</sub> concentration through the frequency shift in micro-resonators is presented. The polymers evaluated are linear polyethylenimine, branched polyethylenimine and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) by microwave reduction with polyethylenimine. The characterization of the coatings was made by using 6 MHz gold-plated quartz crystals, and a proof-of-concept sensor is shown with a diaphragm electrostatic microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) resonator. The methods of producing the solutions of the polymers deposited onto the quartz crystals are presented. A CO<sub>2</sub> concentration range from 0.05 % to 1 % was dissolved in air and humidity level were controlled and evaluated. Linear polyethylenimine showed superior performance with a reaction time obtained for stabilization after the concentration increase of 345 s, while the time for recovery was of 126 s, with a maximum frequency deviation of 33.6 Hz for an in-air CO<sub>2</sub> concentration of 0.1%.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/7/1824polyethyleniminemicro-resonatorco<sub>2</sub> sensorgas sensorhumidity sensorreduced graphene oxidecoatingsmass sensor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alberto Prud’homme
Frederic Nabki
spellingShingle Alberto Prud’homme
Frederic Nabki
Comparison between Linear and Branched Polyethylenimine and Reduced Graphene Oxide Coatings as a Capture Layer for Micro Resonant CO<sub>2</sub> Gas Concentration Sensors
Sensors
polyethylenimine
micro-resonator
co<sub>2</sub> sensor
gas sensor
humidity sensor
reduced graphene oxide
coatings
mass sensor
author_facet Alberto Prud’homme
Frederic Nabki
author_sort Alberto Prud’homme
title Comparison between Linear and Branched Polyethylenimine and Reduced Graphene Oxide Coatings as a Capture Layer for Micro Resonant CO<sub>2</sub> Gas Concentration Sensors
title_short Comparison between Linear and Branched Polyethylenimine and Reduced Graphene Oxide Coatings as a Capture Layer for Micro Resonant CO<sub>2</sub> Gas Concentration Sensors
title_full Comparison between Linear and Branched Polyethylenimine and Reduced Graphene Oxide Coatings as a Capture Layer for Micro Resonant CO<sub>2</sub> Gas Concentration Sensors
title_fullStr Comparison between Linear and Branched Polyethylenimine and Reduced Graphene Oxide Coatings as a Capture Layer for Micro Resonant CO<sub>2</sub> Gas Concentration Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Linear and Branched Polyethylenimine and Reduced Graphene Oxide Coatings as a Capture Layer for Micro Resonant CO<sub>2</sub> Gas Concentration Sensors
title_sort comparison between linear and branched polyethylenimine and reduced graphene oxide coatings as a capture layer for micro resonant co<sub>2</sub> gas concentration sensors
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2020-03-01
description The comparison between potential coatings for the measurement of CO<sub>2</sub> concentration through the frequency shift in micro-resonators is presented. The polymers evaluated are linear polyethylenimine, branched polyethylenimine and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) by microwave reduction with polyethylenimine. The characterization of the coatings was made by using 6 MHz gold-plated quartz crystals, and a proof-of-concept sensor is shown with a diaphragm electrostatic microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) resonator. The methods of producing the solutions of the polymers deposited onto the quartz crystals are presented. A CO<sub>2</sub> concentration range from 0.05 % to 1 % was dissolved in air and humidity level were controlled and evaluated. Linear polyethylenimine showed superior performance with a reaction time obtained for stabilization after the concentration increase of 345 s, while the time for recovery was of 126 s, with a maximum frequency deviation of 33.6 Hz for an in-air CO<sub>2</sub> concentration of 0.1%.
topic polyethylenimine
micro-resonator
co<sub>2</sub> sensor
gas sensor
humidity sensor
reduced graphene oxide
coatings
mass sensor
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/7/1824
work_keys_str_mv AT albertoprudhomme comparisonbetweenlinearandbranchedpolyethylenimineandreducedgrapheneoxidecoatingsasacapturelayerformicroresonantcosub2subgasconcentrationsensors
AT fredericnabki comparisonbetweenlinearandbranchedpolyethylenimineandreducedgrapheneoxidecoatingsasacapturelayerformicroresonantcosub2subgasconcentrationsensors
_version_ 1725027616320126976