Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium
<span class="abs_content">Facing a crucial legitimacy crisis, many Western European political parties have recently undergone various forms of organizational changes by adopting procedures for increasing intra-democracy: internal ballots, internal referenda, primary elections and so...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Coordinamento SIBA
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Partecipazione e Conflitto |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/14789 |
id |
doaj-777c91daa5ba401c8420d17b4ca80d0f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-777c91daa5ba401c8420d17b4ca80d0f2021-06-28T08:02:38ZengCoordinamento SIBAPartecipazione e Conflitto1972-76232035-66092015-03-018119021410.1285/i20356609v8i1p19014041Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of BelgiumGiulia Sandri0Anissa Amjahad1Université Catholique de LilleUniversité libre de Bruxelles<span class="abs_content">Facing a crucial legitimacy crisis, many Western European political parties have recently undergone various forms of organizational changes by adopting procedures for increasing intra-democracy: internal ballots, internal referenda, primary elections and so on. Direct democracy is now used in a wide range of decision-making procedures such as candidate and leadership selection (Cross and Katz, 2013). These reforms have pro-vided new opportunities for participation to party members. What happens to more traditional elements of party internal structures when such instruments of intra-party democracy are adopted? And more specifically, how are such changes perceived by the party base? This paper explores the attitudes and behaviors of members with regard to intra-party democracy procedures. On the basis of a case study (Belgium) and of an original dataset, the paper explores the political consequences of intra-party democracy. We show that members’ satisfaction with the party and their degree of previous internal activism affect the level of involvement in intra-party democracy activities. However, the dissatisfaction of the party base vis-à-vis of the membership role is growing. Intra-party democratization seems to limit the organizational function of the grass-roots membership to a ‘cheerleading’ role.</span><br />http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/14789intra-party democracyleadership selectionparty membershipparty politicsprimary elections |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Giulia Sandri Anissa Amjahad |
spellingShingle |
Giulia Sandri Anissa Amjahad Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium Partecipazione e Conflitto intra-party democracy leadership selection party membership party politics primary elections |
author_facet |
Giulia Sandri Anissa Amjahad |
author_sort |
Giulia Sandri |
title |
Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium |
title_short |
Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium |
title_full |
Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium |
title_fullStr |
Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium |
title_full_unstemmed |
Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium |
title_sort |
party membership and intra-party democracy: how do members react to organizational change within political parties? the case of belgium |
publisher |
Coordinamento SIBA |
series |
Partecipazione e Conflitto |
issn |
1972-7623 2035-6609 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
<span class="abs_content">Facing a crucial legitimacy crisis, many Western European political parties have recently undergone various forms of organizational changes by adopting procedures for increasing intra-democracy: internal ballots, internal referenda, primary elections and so on. Direct democracy is now used in a wide range of decision-making procedures such as candidate and leadership selection (Cross and Katz, 2013). These reforms have pro-vided new opportunities for participation to party members. What happens to more traditional elements of party internal structures when such instruments of intra-party democracy are adopted? And more specifically, how are such changes perceived by the party base? This paper explores the attitudes and behaviors of members with regard to intra-party democracy procedures. On the basis of a case study (Belgium) and of an original dataset, the paper explores the political consequences of intra-party democracy. We show that members’ satisfaction with the party and their degree of previous internal activism affect the level of involvement in intra-party democracy activities. However, the dissatisfaction of the party base vis-à-vis of the membership role is growing. Intra-party democratization seems to limit the organizational function of the grass-roots membership to a ‘cheerleading’ role.</span><br /> |
topic |
intra-party democracy leadership selection party membership party politics primary elections |
url |
http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/14789 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giuliasandri partymembershipandintrapartydemocracyhowdomembersreacttoorganizationalchangewithinpoliticalpartiesthecaseofbelgium AT anissaamjahad partymembershipandintrapartydemocracyhowdomembersreacttoorganizationalchangewithinpoliticalpartiesthecaseofbelgium |
_version_ |
1721356643537518592 |