The role of stimulus-driven versus goal-directed processes in fight and flight tendencies measured with motor evoked potentials induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

This study examines two contrasting explanations for early tendencies to fight and flee. According to a stimulus-driven explanation, goal-incompatible stimuli that are easy/difficult to control lead to the tendency to fight/flee. According to a goal-directed explanation, on the other hand, the tende...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agnes Moors, Chiara Fini, Tom Everaert, Lara Bardi, Evelien Bossuyt, Peter Kuppens, Marcel Brass
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217266
id doaj-776bbf7641c540c6bc64e05b135cbedd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-776bbf7641c540c6bc64e05b135cbedd2021-03-03T20:40:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01145e021726610.1371/journal.pone.0217266The role of stimulus-driven versus goal-directed processes in fight and flight tendencies measured with motor evoked potentials induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.Agnes MoorsChiara FiniTom EveraertLara BardiEvelien BossuytPeter KuppensMarcel BrassThis study examines two contrasting explanations for early tendencies to fight and flee. According to a stimulus-driven explanation, goal-incompatible stimuli that are easy/difficult to control lead to the tendency to fight/flee. According to a goal-directed explanation, on the other hand, the tendency to fight/flee occurs when the expected utility of fighting/fleeing is the highest. Participants did a computer task in which they were confronted with goal-incompatible stimuli that were (a) easy to control and fighting had the highest expected utility, (b) easy to control and fleeing had the highest expected utility, and (c) difficult to control and fleeing and fighting had zero expected utility. After participants were trained to use one hand to fight and another hand to flee, they either had to choose a response or merely observe the stimuli. During the observation trials, single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) was applied to the primary motor cortex 450 ms post-stimulus onset and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from the hand muscles. Results showed that participants chose to fight/flee when the expected utility of fighting/fleeing was the highest, and that they responded late when the expected utility of both responses was low. They also showed larger MEPs for the right/left hand when the expected utility of fighting/fleeing was the highest. This result can be interpreted as support for the goal-directed account, but only if it is assumed that we were unable to override the presumed natural mapping between hand (right/left) and response (fight/flight).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217266
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Agnes Moors
Chiara Fini
Tom Everaert
Lara Bardi
Evelien Bossuyt
Peter Kuppens
Marcel Brass
spellingShingle Agnes Moors
Chiara Fini
Tom Everaert
Lara Bardi
Evelien Bossuyt
Peter Kuppens
Marcel Brass
The role of stimulus-driven versus goal-directed processes in fight and flight tendencies measured with motor evoked potentials induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Agnes Moors
Chiara Fini
Tom Everaert
Lara Bardi
Evelien Bossuyt
Peter Kuppens
Marcel Brass
author_sort Agnes Moors
title The role of stimulus-driven versus goal-directed processes in fight and flight tendencies measured with motor evoked potentials induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
title_short The role of stimulus-driven versus goal-directed processes in fight and flight tendencies measured with motor evoked potentials induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
title_full The role of stimulus-driven versus goal-directed processes in fight and flight tendencies measured with motor evoked potentials induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
title_fullStr The role of stimulus-driven versus goal-directed processes in fight and flight tendencies measured with motor evoked potentials induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
title_full_unstemmed The role of stimulus-driven versus goal-directed processes in fight and flight tendencies measured with motor evoked potentials induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
title_sort role of stimulus-driven versus goal-directed processes in fight and flight tendencies measured with motor evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This study examines two contrasting explanations for early tendencies to fight and flee. According to a stimulus-driven explanation, goal-incompatible stimuli that are easy/difficult to control lead to the tendency to fight/flee. According to a goal-directed explanation, on the other hand, the tendency to fight/flee occurs when the expected utility of fighting/fleeing is the highest. Participants did a computer task in which they were confronted with goal-incompatible stimuli that were (a) easy to control and fighting had the highest expected utility, (b) easy to control and fleeing had the highest expected utility, and (c) difficult to control and fleeing and fighting had zero expected utility. After participants were trained to use one hand to fight and another hand to flee, they either had to choose a response or merely observe the stimuli. During the observation trials, single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) was applied to the primary motor cortex 450 ms post-stimulus onset and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from the hand muscles. Results showed that participants chose to fight/flee when the expected utility of fighting/fleeing was the highest, and that they responded late when the expected utility of both responses was low. They also showed larger MEPs for the right/left hand when the expected utility of fighting/fleeing was the highest. This result can be interpreted as support for the goal-directed account, but only if it is assumed that we were unable to override the presumed natural mapping between hand (right/left) and response (fight/flight).
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217266
work_keys_str_mv AT agnesmoors theroleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT chiarafini theroleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT tomeveraert theroleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT larabardi theroleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT evelienbossuyt theroleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT peterkuppens theroleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT marcelbrass theroleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT agnesmoors roleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT chiarafini roleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT tomeveraert roleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT larabardi roleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT evelienbossuyt roleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT peterkuppens roleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT marcelbrass roleofstimulusdrivenversusgoaldirectedprocessesinfightandflighttendenciesmeasuredwithmotorevokedpotentialsinducedbytranscranialmagneticstimulation
_version_ 1714821161444966400