Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002
Under the influence of doctrinal current that advocates the constitutionalizsation of civil law, expanded the discussion on the promotional role of the Civil Code of 2002 with regard to substantive equality. In this paper, we try to analyze the instruments offered by the novel encoding for the reali...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Conpedi Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://portaltutor.com/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/143 |
id |
doaj-7768d0f168bd4a96be7b30e3c82ee10a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7768d0f168bd4a96be7b30e3c82ee10a2020-11-24T22:57:03ZspaConselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em DireitoConpedi Law Review2448-39312448-39312016-06-01181841135Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro Borges0Emanuel Lins Freire Vasconcellos1Universidade Federal da BahiaFaculdade de Direito da UFBAUnder the influence of doctrinal current that advocates the constitutionalizsation of civil law, expanded the discussion on the promotional role of the Civil Code of 2002 with regard to substantive equality. In this paper, we try to analyze the instruments offered by the novel encoding for the realization of the aforementioned equality, as opposed to the protection of formal equality erected by the nineteenth-century encodings, and in Brazil, the Civil Code of 1916. Located historically in a statement period prestacionais rights and built based on different coding guidelines of the Brazilian 1916, the new Civil Diploma features, even if timid and insufficient, suitable instruments to the achievement of the aforementioned substantive equality, which are forgotten by significant doctrinal contingent because of valuation in excess of the phenomenon called constitutionalization of law.http://portaltutor.com/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/143Autonomia privadaIgualdade substancialConstitucionalização do direitoSincretismo metodológicoDefeitos do negócio jurídico. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro Borges Emanuel Lins Freire Vasconcellos |
spellingShingle |
Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro Borges Emanuel Lins Freire Vasconcellos Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002 Conpedi Law Review Autonomia privada Igualdade substancial Constitucionalização do direito Sincretismo metodológico Defeitos do negócio jurídico. |
author_facet |
Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro Borges Emanuel Lins Freire Vasconcellos |
author_sort |
Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro Borges |
title |
Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002 |
title_short |
Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002 |
title_full |
Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002 |
title_fullStr |
Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002 |
title_sort |
substantial and private autonomy equality in civil code 2002 |
publisher |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito |
series |
Conpedi Law Review |
issn |
2448-3931 2448-3931 |
publishDate |
2016-06-01 |
description |
Under the influence of doctrinal current that advocates the constitutionalizsation of civil law, expanded the discussion on the promotional role of the Civil Code of 2002 with regard to substantive equality. In this paper, we try to analyze the instruments offered by the novel encoding for the realization of the aforementioned equality, as opposed to the protection of formal equality erected by the nineteenth-century encodings, and in Brazil, the Civil Code of 1916. Located historically in a statement period prestacionais rights and built based on different coding guidelines of the Brazilian 1916, the new Civil Diploma features, even if timid and insufficient, suitable instruments to the achievement of the aforementioned substantive equality, which are forgotten by significant doctrinal contingent because of valuation in excess of the phenomenon called constitutionalization of law. |
topic |
Autonomia privada Igualdade substancial Constitucionalização do direito Sincretismo metodológico Defeitos do negócio jurídico. |
url |
http://portaltutor.com/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/143 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT roxanacardosobrasileiroborges substantialandprivateautonomyequalityincivilcode2002 AT emanuellinsfreirevasconcellos substantialandprivateautonomyequalityincivilcode2002 |
_version_ |
1725652228577951744 |