Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish

This paper investigates the logophoric pronoun system of Finnish, with a focus on reference to animals, to further our understanding of the linguistic representation of non-human animals, how perspective-taking is signaled linguistically, and how this relates to features such as [+/-HUMAN]. In conte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kaiser Elsi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2018-12-01
Series:Open Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0031
id doaj-7751619f826a441fa0818700d6302b2d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7751619f826a441fa0818700d6302b2d2021-10-02T17:48:07ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692018-12-014163065610.1515/opli-2018-0031opli-2018-0031Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in FinnishKaiser Elsi0Department of Linguistics University of Southern California,Los Angeles, USAThis paper investigates the logophoric pronoun system of Finnish, with a focus on reference to animals, to further our understanding of the linguistic representation of non-human animals, how perspective-taking is signaled linguistically, and how this relates to features such as [+/-HUMAN]. In contexts where animals are grammatically [-HUMAN] but conceptualized as the perspectival center (whose thoughts, speech or mental state is being reported), can they be referred to with logophoric pronouns? Colloquial Finnish is claimed to have a logophoric pronoun which has the same form as the human-referring pronoun of standard Finnish, han (she/he). This allows us to test whether a pronoun that may at first blush seem featurally specified to seek [+HUMAN] referents can be used for [-HUMAN] referents when they are logophoric. I used corpus data to compare the claim that han is logophoric in both standard and colloquial Finnish vs. the claim that the two registers have different logophoric systems. I argue for a unified system where han is logophoric in both registers, and moreover can be used for logophoric [-HUMAN] referents in both colloquial and standard Finnish. Thus, on its logophoric use, han does not require its referent to be [+HUMAN].https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0031finnishlogophoric pronounslogophoricityanti-logophoricityanimacynon-human animalsperspective-takingcorpus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kaiser Elsi
spellingShingle Kaiser Elsi
Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish
Open Linguistics
finnish
logophoric pronouns
logophoricity
anti-logophoricity
animacy
non-human animals
perspective-taking
corpus
author_facet Kaiser Elsi
author_sort Kaiser Elsi
title Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish
title_short Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish
title_full Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish
title_fullStr Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish
title_full_unstemmed Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish
title_sort effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: logophoricity in finnish
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Linguistics
issn 2300-9969
publishDate 2018-12-01
description This paper investigates the logophoric pronoun system of Finnish, with a focus on reference to animals, to further our understanding of the linguistic representation of non-human animals, how perspective-taking is signaled linguistically, and how this relates to features such as [+/-HUMAN]. In contexts where animals are grammatically [-HUMAN] but conceptualized as the perspectival center (whose thoughts, speech or mental state is being reported), can they be referred to with logophoric pronouns? Colloquial Finnish is claimed to have a logophoric pronoun which has the same form as the human-referring pronoun of standard Finnish, han (she/he). This allows us to test whether a pronoun that may at first blush seem featurally specified to seek [+HUMAN] referents can be used for [-HUMAN] referents when they are logophoric. I used corpus data to compare the claim that han is logophoric in both standard and colloquial Finnish vs. the claim that the two registers have different logophoric systems. I argue for a unified system where han is logophoric in both registers, and moreover can be used for logophoric [-HUMAN] referents in both colloquial and standard Finnish. Thus, on its logophoric use, han does not require its referent to be [+HUMAN].
topic finnish
logophoric pronouns
logophoricity
anti-logophoricity
animacy
non-human animals
perspective-taking
corpus
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0031
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiserelsi effectsofperspectivetakingonpronominalreferencetohumansandanimalslogophoricityinfinnish
_version_ 1716850475587862528