Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish
This paper investigates the logophoric pronoun system of Finnish, with a focus on reference to animals, to further our understanding of the linguistic representation of non-human animals, how perspective-taking is signaled linguistically, and how this relates to features such as [+/-HUMAN]. In conte...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Open Linguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0031 |
id |
doaj-7751619f826a441fa0818700d6302b2d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7751619f826a441fa0818700d6302b2d2021-10-02T17:48:07ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692018-12-014163065610.1515/opli-2018-0031opli-2018-0031Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in FinnishKaiser Elsi0Department of Linguistics University of Southern California,Los Angeles, USAThis paper investigates the logophoric pronoun system of Finnish, with a focus on reference to animals, to further our understanding of the linguistic representation of non-human animals, how perspective-taking is signaled linguistically, and how this relates to features such as [+/-HUMAN]. In contexts where animals are grammatically [-HUMAN] but conceptualized as the perspectival center (whose thoughts, speech or mental state is being reported), can they be referred to with logophoric pronouns? Colloquial Finnish is claimed to have a logophoric pronoun which has the same form as the human-referring pronoun of standard Finnish, han (she/he). This allows us to test whether a pronoun that may at first blush seem featurally specified to seek [+HUMAN] referents can be used for [-HUMAN] referents when they are logophoric. I used corpus data to compare the claim that han is logophoric in both standard and colloquial Finnish vs. the claim that the two registers have different logophoric systems. I argue for a unified system where han is logophoric in both registers, and moreover can be used for logophoric [-HUMAN] referents in both colloquial and standard Finnish. Thus, on its logophoric use, han does not require its referent to be [+HUMAN].https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0031finnishlogophoric pronounslogophoricityanti-logophoricityanimacynon-human animalsperspective-takingcorpus |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kaiser Elsi |
spellingShingle |
Kaiser Elsi Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish Open Linguistics finnish logophoric pronouns logophoricity anti-logophoricity animacy non-human animals perspective-taking corpus |
author_facet |
Kaiser Elsi |
author_sort |
Kaiser Elsi |
title |
Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish |
title_short |
Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish |
title_full |
Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish |
title_fullStr |
Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish |
title_sort |
effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: logophoricity in finnish |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Linguistics |
issn |
2300-9969 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
This paper investigates the logophoric pronoun system of Finnish, with a focus on reference to animals, to further our understanding of the linguistic representation of non-human animals, how perspective-taking is signaled linguistically, and how this relates to features such as [+/-HUMAN]. In contexts where animals are grammatically [-HUMAN] but conceptualized as the perspectival center (whose thoughts, speech or mental state is being reported), can they be referred to with logophoric pronouns? Colloquial Finnish is claimed to have a logophoric pronoun which has the same form as the human-referring pronoun of standard Finnish, han (she/he). This allows us to test whether a pronoun that may at first blush seem featurally specified to seek [+HUMAN] referents can be used for [-HUMAN] referents when they are logophoric. I used corpus data to compare the claim that han is logophoric in both standard and colloquial Finnish vs. the claim that the two registers have different logophoric systems. I argue for a unified system where han is logophoric in both registers, and moreover can be used for logophoric [-HUMAN] referents in both colloquial and standard Finnish. Thus, on its logophoric use, han does not require its referent to be [+HUMAN]. |
topic |
finnish logophoric pronouns logophoricity anti-logophoricity animacy non-human animals perspective-taking corpus |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0031 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kaiserelsi effectsofperspectivetakingonpronominalreferencetohumansandanimalslogophoricityinfinnish |
_version_ |
1716850475587862528 |