Divine Agency as Literal in Cognitive Linguistic Perspective: Response to “Conceiving God: Literal and Figurative Prompt for a More Tectonic Distinction” by Robert Masson
In “Conceiving God: Literal and Figurative Prompt for a More Tectonic Distinction” Robert Masson criticizes my claim that some concepts of God can be literal in the sense of a non-extended meaning as defined by cognitive linguists. He claims that all of our ideas for God can only be through extended...
Main Author: | Sanders John |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Open Theology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0037 |
Similar Items
-
Conceiving God: Literal and Figurative Prompt for a More Tectonic Distinction
by: Masson Robert
Published: (2018-02-01) -
Literal, forty years
by: Esteban Prado
Published: (2017-03-01) -
So to Speak: A Computational and Empirical Investigation of Lexical Cohesion of Non-Literal and Literal Expressions in Text
by: Alexis Palmer, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01) -
The Assessment of Literal Ornaments in Persian Badiâ Books from the linguistic, Phonetic and Phonologic Viewpoint
by: Morteza Heidari
Published: (2016-05-01) -
Ibn ‘Arabī, Fiqh, and a Literal Reading of the Qur’an: Approaching the Outward Divine Commands as a Spiritual Realization
by: Lien Iffah Naf'atu Fina
Published: (2018-10-01)