Cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with DSST.

Cognitive reserve (CR) is understood as capacity to cope with challenging conditions, e.g. after brain injury or in states of brain dysfunction, or age-related cognitive decline. CR in elderly subjects has attracted much research interest, but differences between healthy older and younger subjects h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Josef Zihl, Thomas Fink, Florian Pargent, Matthias Ziegler, Markus Bühner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3880294?pdf=render
id doaj-773b0cf97ba843c581e176c05825607c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-773b0cf97ba843c581e176c05825607c2020-11-25T02:11:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8459010.1371/journal.pone.0084590Cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with DSST.Josef ZihlThomas FinkFlorian PargentMatthias ZieglerMarkus BühnerCognitive reserve (CR) is understood as capacity to cope with challenging conditions, e.g. after brain injury or in states of brain dysfunction, or age-related cognitive decline. CR in elderly subjects has attracted much research interest, but differences between healthy older and younger subjects have not been addressed in detail hitherto. Usually, one-time standard individual assessments are used to characterise CR. Here we observe CR as individual improvement in cognitive performance (gain) in a complex testing-the-limits paradigm, the digit symbol substitution test (DSST), with 10 repeated measurements, in 140 younger (20-30 yrs) and 140 older (57-74 yrs) healthy subjects. In addition, we assessed attention, memory and executive function, and mood and personality traits as potential influence factors for CR. We found that both, younger and older subjects showed significant gains, which were significantly correlated with speed of information processing, verbal short-term memory and visual problem solving in the older group only. Gender, personality traits and mood did not significantly influence gains in either group. Surprisingly about half of the older subjects performed at the level of the younger group, suggesting that interindividual differences in CR are possibly age-independent. We propose that these findings may also be understood as indication that one-time standard individual measurements do not allow assessment of CR, and that the use of DSST in a testing-the-limits paradigm is a valuable assessment method for CR in young and elderly subjects.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3880294?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Josef Zihl
Thomas Fink
Florian Pargent
Matthias Ziegler
Markus Bühner
spellingShingle Josef Zihl
Thomas Fink
Florian Pargent
Matthias Ziegler
Markus Bühner
Cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with DSST.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Josef Zihl
Thomas Fink
Florian Pargent
Matthias Ziegler
Markus Bühner
author_sort Josef Zihl
title Cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with DSST.
title_short Cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with DSST.
title_full Cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with DSST.
title_fullStr Cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with DSST.
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with DSST.
title_sort cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with dsst.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Cognitive reserve (CR) is understood as capacity to cope with challenging conditions, e.g. after brain injury or in states of brain dysfunction, or age-related cognitive decline. CR in elderly subjects has attracted much research interest, but differences between healthy older and younger subjects have not been addressed in detail hitherto. Usually, one-time standard individual assessments are used to characterise CR. Here we observe CR as individual improvement in cognitive performance (gain) in a complex testing-the-limits paradigm, the digit symbol substitution test (DSST), with 10 repeated measurements, in 140 younger (20-30 yrs) and 140 older (57-74 yrs) healthy subjects. In addition, we assessed attention, memory and executive function, and mood and personality traits as potential influence factors for CR. We found that both, younger and older subjects showed significant gains, which were significantly correlated with speed of information processing, verbal short-term memory and visual problem solving in the older group only. Gender, personality traits and mood did not significantly influence gains in either group. Surprisingly about half of the older subjects performed at the level of the younger group, suggesting that interindividual differences in CR are possibly age-independent. We propose that these findings may also be understood as indication that one-time standard individual measurements do not allow assessment of CR, and that the use of DSST in a testing-the-limits paradigm is a valuable assessment method for CR in young and elderly subjects.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3880294?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT josefzihl cognitivereserveinyoungandoldhealthysubjectsdifferencesandsimilaritiesinatestingthelimitsparadigmwithdsst
AT thomasfink cognitivereserveinyoungandoldhealthysubjectsdifferencesandsimilaritiesinatestingthelimitsparadigmwithdsst
AT florianpargent cognitivereserveinyoungandoldhealthysubjectsdifferencesandsimilaritiesinatestingthelimitsparadigmwithdsst
AT matthiasziegler cognitivereserveinyoungandoldhealthysubjectsdifferencesandsimilaritiesinatestingthelimitsparadigmwithdsst
AT markusbuhner cognitivereserveinyoungandoldhealthysubjectsdifferencesandsimilaritiesinatestingthelimitsparadigmwithdsst
_version_ 1724911570407915520