Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality
The allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" written by Sanei in his book Hadigh al-Hadigheh are based on Kimiyaye Sa’adat penned by Ghazali. The aim of this study was to explore the hypertextual relationship of these two versions. To this purpose, using Gerard Genet...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Alzahra University
2014-09-01
|
Series: | ادبیات عرفانی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jml.alzahra.ac.ir/article_1921_fee4b7234c23bf8a0d69d09bb6f640c6.pdf |
id |
doaj-7738e84ab15b4532876fc300f5faf237 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7738e84ab15b4532876fc300f5faf2372021-07-24T07:46:28ZfasAlzahra Universityادبیات عرفانی2008-93842538-19972014-09-0161115317610.22051/jml.2015.19211921Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextualityMonireh Farzishob0Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi1Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Golestan UniversityAssistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, University of ZabolThe allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" written by Sanei in his book Hadigh al-Hadigheh are based on Kimiyaye Sa’adat penned by Ghazali. The aim of this study was to explore the hypertextual relationship of these two versions. To this purpose, using Gerard Genette’ theory of hypertextuality, the link between Sanaei and Ghazali’s versions was investigated with the results suggesting the presence of some text size variations and new semantic implications that could be analyzed based on quantitative transformation and pragmatic transformation. The former revealed that Sanaei had employed augmentation in his version by expanding the number of proportions from 21 in Ghazali’s version to 42 in his narrative. The latter was examined in two semantic layers. Transformations in the first layer consisted of changes in characters and events made by Sanaei. In the second layer, transformations indicated that with respect to the inability of the intellect in knowing God, Sanaei had just extended what his ancestors had stated about intellect and ego of man to the common intellect and soul, positing that the human and world intellect and ego are incapable of construing the divine mysteries either individually or collectively.https://jml.alzahra.ac.ir/article_1921_fee4b7234c23bf8a0d69d09bb6f640c6.pdfsanaeial-ghazalihypertextualityquantitative transformationpragmatic transformation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Monireh Farzishob Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi |
spellingShingle |
Monireh Farzishob Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality ادبیات عرفانی sanaei al-ghazali hypertextuality quantitative transformation pragmatic transformation |
author_facet |
Monireh Farzishob Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi |
author_sort |
Monireh Farzishob |
title |
Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality |
title_short |
Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality |
title_full |
Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality |
title_fullStr |
Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality |
title_sort |
comparing allegorical narratives of \"elephant in the city of the blind\" from sanaei and ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality |
publisher |
Alzahra University |
series |
ادبیات عرفانی |
issn |
2008-9384 2538-1997 |
publishDate |
2014-09-01 |
description |
The allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" written by Sanei in his book Hadigh al-Hadigheh are based on Kimiyaye Sa’adat penned by Ghazali. The aim of this study was to explore the hypertextual relationship of these two versions. To this purpose, using Gerard Genette’ theory of hypertextuality, the link between Sanaei and Ghazali’s versions was investigated with the results suggesting the presence of some text size variations and new semantic implications that could be analyzed based on quantitative transformation and pragmatic transformation. The former revealed that Sanaei had employed augmentation in his version by expanding the number of proportions from 21 in Ghazali’s version to 42 in his narrative. The latter was examined in two semantic layers. Transformations in the first layer consisted of changes in characters and events made by Sanaei. In the second layer, transformations indicated that with respect to the inability of the intellect in knowing God, Sanaei had just extended what his ancestors had stated about intellect and ego of man to the common intellect and soul, positing that the human and world intellect and ego are incapable of construing the divine mysteries either individually or collectively. |
topic |
sanaei al-ghazali hypertextuality quantitative transformation pragmatic transformation |
url |
https://jml.alzahra.ac.ir/article_1921_fee4b7234c23bf8a0d69d09bb6f640c6.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT monirehfarzishob comparingallegoricalnarrativesofelephantinthecityoftheblindfromsanaeiandghazaliwithrespecttothetheoryofhypertextuality AT faezeharabyousefabadi comparingallegoricalnarrativesofelephantinthecityoftheblindfromsanaeiandghazaliwithrespecttothetheoryofhypertextuality |
_version_ |
1721284245744254976 |