Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality

The allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" written by Sanei in his book Hadigh al-Hadigheh are based on Kimiyaye Sa’adat penned by Ghazali. The aim of this study was to explore the hypertextual relationship of these two versions. To this purpose, using Gerard Genet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monireh Farzishob, Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Alzahra University 2014-09-01
Series:ادبیات عرفانی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jml.alzahra.ac.ir/article_1921_fee4b7234c23bf8a0d69d09bb6f640c6.pdf
id doaj-7738e84ab15b4532876fc300f5faf237
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7738e84ab15b4532876fc300f5faf2372021-07-24T07:46:28ZfasAlzahra Universityادبیات عرفانی2008-93842538-19972014-09-0161115317610.22051/jml.2015.19211921Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextualityMonireh Farzishob0Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi1Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Golestan UniversityAssistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, University of ZabolThe allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" written by Sanei in his book Hadigh al-Hadigheh are based on Kimiyaye Sa’adat penned by Ghazali. The aim of this study was to explore the hypertextual relationship of these two versions. To this purpose, using Gerard Genette’ theory of hypertextuality, the link between Sanaei and Ghazali’s versions was investigated with the results suggesting the presence of some text size variations and new semantic implications that could be analyzed based on quantitative transformation and pragmatic transformation. The former revealed that Sanaei had employed augmentation in his version by expanding the number of proportions from 21 in Ghazali’s version to 42 in his narrative. The latter was examined in two semantic layers. Transformations in the first layer consisted of changes in characters and events made by Sanaei. In the second layer, transformations indicated that with respect to the inability of the intellect in knowing God, Sanaei had just extended what his ancestors had stated about intellect and ego of man to the common intellect and soul, positing that the human and world intellect and ego are incapable of construing the divine mysteries either individually or collectively.https://jml.alzahra.ac.ir/article_1921_fee4b7234c23bf8a0d69d09bb6f640c6.pdfsanaeial-ghazalihypertextualityquantitative transformationpragmatic transformation
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Monireh Farzishob
Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi
spellingShingle Monireh Farzishob
Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi
Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality
ادبیات عرفانی
sanaei
al-ghazali
hypertextuality
quantitative transformation
pragmatic transformation
author_facet Monireh Farzishob
Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi
author_sort Monireh Farzishob
title Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality
title_short Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality
title_full Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality
title_fullStr Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality
title_full_unstemmed Comparing allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" from Sanaei and Ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality
title_sort comparing allegorical narratives of \"elephant in the city of the blind\" from sanaei and ghazali with respect to the theory of hypertextuality
publisher Alzahra University
series ادبیات عرفانی
issn 2008-9384
2538-1997
publishDate 2014-09-01
description The allegorical narratives of \"Elephant in the city of the blind\" written by Sanei in his book Hadigh al-Hadigheh are based on Kimiyaye Sa’adat penned by Ghazali. The aim of this study was to explore the hypertextual relationship of these two versions. To this purpose, using Gerard Genette’ theory of hypertextuality, the link between Sanaei and Ghazali’s versions was investigated with the results suggesting the presence of some text size variations and new semantic implications that could be analyzed based on quantitative transformation and pragmatic transformation. The former revealed that Sanaei had employed augmentation in his version by expanding the number of proportions from 21 in Ghazali’s version to 42 in his narrative. The latter was examined in two semantic layers. Transformations in the first layer consisted of changes in characters and events made by Sanaei. In the second layer, transformations indicated that with respect to the inability of the intellect in knowing God, Sanaei had just extended what his ancestors had stated about intellect and ego of man to the common intellect and soul, positing that the human and world intellect and ego are incapable of construing the divine mysteries either individually or collectively.
topic sanaei
al-ghazali
hypertextuality
quantitative transformation
pragmatic transformation
url https://jml.alzahra.ac.ir/article_1921_fee4b7234c23bf8a0d69d09bb6f640c6.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT monirehfarzishob comparingallegoricalnarrativesofelephantinthecityoftheblindfromsanaeiandghazaliwithrespecttothetheoryofhypertextuality
AT faezeharabyousefabadi comparingallegoricalnarrativesofelephantinthecityoftheblindfromsanaeiandghazaliwithrespecttothetheoryofhypertextuality
_version_ 1721284245744254976