Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics

Research in student knowledge and learning of science has typically focused on explaining conceptual change. Recent research, however, documents the great degree to which student thinking is dynamic and context-sensitive, implicitly calling for explanations not only of change but also of stability....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brian W. Frank, Rachel E. Scherr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2012-07-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020101
id doaj-7723b2de6f214e6a9dc8caf3d4b00669
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7723b2de6f214e6a9dc8caf3d4b006692020-11-24T21:32:46ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research1554-91782012-07-018202010110.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020101Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physicsBrian W. FrankRachel E. ScherrResearch in student knowledge and learning of science has typically focused on explaining conceptual change. Recent research, however, documents the great degree to which student thinking is dynamic and context-sensitive, implicitly calling for explanations not only of change but also of stability. In other words, when a pattern of student reasoning is sustained in specific moments and settings, what mechanisms contribute to sustaining it? We characterize student understanding and behavior in terms of multiple local coherences in that they may be variable yet still exhibit local stabilities. We attribute stability in local conceptual coherences to real-time activities that sustain these coherences. For example, particular conceptual understandings may be stabilized by the linguistic features of a worksheet question or by feedback from the students’ spatial arrangement and orientation. We document a group of university students who engage in multiple local conceptual coherences while thinking about motion during a collaborative learning activity. As the students shift their thinking several times, we describe mechanisms that may contribute to local stability of their reasoning and behavior.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020101
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brian W. Frank
Rachel E. Scherr
spellingShingle Brian W. Frank
Rachel E. Scherr
Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics
Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
author_facet Brian W. Frank
Rachel E. Scherr
author_sort Brian W. Frank
title Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics
title_short Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics
title_full Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics
title_fullStr Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics
title_full_unstemmed Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics
title_sort interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
issn 1554-9178
publishDate 2012-07-01
description Research in student knowledge and learning of science has typically focused on explaining conceptual change. Recent research, however, documents the great degree to which student thinking is dynamic and context-sensitive, implicitly calling for explanations not only of change but also of stability. In other words, when a pattern of student reasoning is sustained in specific moments and settings, what mechanisms contribute to sustaining it? We characterize student understanding and behavior in terms of multiple local coherences in that they may be variable yet still exhibit local stabilities. We attribute stability in local conceptual coherences to real-time activities that sustain these coherences. For example, particular conceptual understandings may be stabilized by the linguistic features of a worksheet question or by feedback from the students’ spatial arrangement and orientation. We document a group of university students who engage in multiple local conceptual coherences while thinking about motion during a collaborative learning activity. As the students shift their thinking several times, we describe mechanisms that may contribute to local stability of their reasoning and behavior.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020101
work_keys_str_mv AT brianwfrank interactionalprocessesforstabilizingconceptualcoherencesinphysics
AT rachelescherr interactionalprocessesforstabilizingconceptualcoherencesinphysics
_version_ 1716700894442029056