On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I)

The first part of this paper analyzes a text by Theophylact of Ohrid known as In Defense of Eunuchs. In terms of its genre and topic, this work stands alone in Byzantine literature. Through a dialogue between the two interlocutors - a monk and a eunuch, Theophylact challenges the traditiona...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krsmanović Bojana, Todorović Darko
Format: Article
Language:Bulgarian
Published: Institute for Byzantine Studies of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts 2015-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova Vizantološkog Instituta
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0584-9888/2015/0584-98881552091K.pdf
id doaj-771fff25603041c59976a2d09a0f7c9c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-771fff25603041c59976a2d09a0f7c9c2020-11-24T23:43:31ZbulInstitute for Byzantine Studies of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and ArtsZbornik Radova Vizantološkog Instituta0584-98882406-09172015-01-012015529117210.2298/ZRVI1552091K0584-98881552091KOn Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I)Krsmanović Bojana0Todorović Darko1Institute for Byzantine Studies of the SASA, BelgradeFaculty of Philosophy, BelgradeThe first part of this paper analyzes a text by Theophylact of Ohrid known as In Defense of Eunuchs. In terms of its genre and topic, this work stands alone in Byzantine literature. Through a dialogue between the two interlocutors - a monk and a eunuch, Theophylact challenges the traditional representation of eunuchs. He particularly focuses on the condemnation of castration in Ecclesiastical Canons and secular legislation (of the late Roman Empire and Byzantium). Theophylact highlights the ambivalence of the views on eunuchs in Byzantine society, demonstrating that castration as such did not necessarily lead to the marginalization of the castrated individual. The most important part of Theophylact’s Defense offers a comparison between “the bearded” and eunuchs in monastic orders. Also, the affirmation of freedom of choice between good and evil and insisting that an individual should be judged according to his own deeds is the guiding idea of Theophylact’s Defense. The second part of the paper contains a Serbian translation of Theophylact’s text with a commentary. Besides the French translation by the editor of the critical edition P. Gautier, this is the second complete translation of the Greek original. It deviates from Gautier’s version in several places, offering alternative readings of ambiguous places. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 177032: Tradicija, inovacija i identitet u vizantijskom svetu]http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0584-9888/2015/0584-98881552091K.pdfTheophylact of Ohrideunuchmonkoeconomy (οiκονομíα)ecclesiastical and secular legislation
collection DOAJ
language Bulgarian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Krsmanović Bojana
Todorović Darko
spellingShingle Krsmanović Bojana
Todorović Darko
On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I)
Zbornik Radova Vizantološkog Instituta
Theophylact of Ohrid
eunuch
monk
oeconomy (οiκονομíα)
ecclesiastical and secular legislation
author_facet Krsmanović Bojana
Todorović Darko
author_sort Krsmanović Bojana
title On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I)
title_short On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I)
title_full On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I)
title_fullStr On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I)
title_full_unstemmed On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I)
title_sort on theophylact’s in defense of eunuchs (i)
publisher Institute for Byzantine Studies of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
series Zbornik Radova Vizantološkog Instituta
issn 0584-9888
2406-0917
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The first part of this paper analyzes a text by Theophylact of Ohrid known as In Defense of Eunuchs. In terms of its genre and topic, this work stands alone in Byzantine literature. Through a dialogue between the two interlocutors - a monk and a eunuch, Theophylact challenges the traditional representation of eunuchs. He particularly focuses on the condemnation of castration in Ecclesiastical Canons and secular legislation (of the late Roman Empire and Byzantium). Theophylact highlights the ambivalence of the views on eunuchs in Byzantine society, demonstrating that castration as such did not necessarily lead to the marginalization of the castrated individual. The most important part of Theophylact’s Defense offers a comparison between “the bearded” and eunuchs in monastic orders. Also, the affirmation of freedom of choice between good and evil and insisting that an individual should be judged according to his own deeds is the guiding idea of Theophylact’s Defense. The second part of the paper contains a Serbian translation of Theophylact’s text with a commentary. Besides the French translation by the editor of the critical edition P. Gautier, this is the second complete translation of the Greek original. It deviates from Gautier’s version in several places, offering alternative readings of ambiguous places. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 177032: Tradicija, inovacija i identitet u vizantijskom svetu]
topic Theophylact of Ohrid
eunuch
monk
oeconomy (οiκονομíα)
ecclesiastical and secular legislation
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0584-9888/2015/0584-98881552091K.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT krsmanovicbojana ontheophylactsindefenseofeunuchsi
AT todorovicdarko ontheophylactsindefenseofeunuchsi
_version_ 1725501164073517056