On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I)
The first part of this paper analyzes a text by Theophylact of Ohrid known as In Defense of Eunuchs. In terms of its genre and topic, this work stands alone in Byzantine literature. Through a dialogue between the two interlocutors - a monk and a eunuch, Theophylact challenges the traditiona...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Bulgarian |
Published: |
Institute for Byzantine Studies of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Zbornik Radova Vizantološkog Instituta |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0584-9888/2015/0584-98881552091K.pdf |
id |
doaj-771fff25603041c59976a2d09a0f7c9c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-771fff25603041c59976a2d09a0f7c9c2020-11-24T23:43:31ZbulInstitute for Byzantine Studies of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and ArtsZbornik Radova Vizantološkog Instituta0584-98882406-09172015-01-012015529117210.2298/ZRVI1552091K0584-98881552091KOn Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I)Krsmanović Bojana0Todorović Darko1Institute for Byzantine Studies of the SASA, BelgradeFaculty of Philosophy, BelgradeThe first part of this paper analyzes a text by Theophylact of Ohrid known as In Defense of Eunuchs. In terms of its genre and topic, this work stands alone in Byzantine literature. Through a dialogue between the two interlocutors - a monk and a eunuch, Theophylact challenges the traditional representation of eunuchs. He particularly focuses on the condemnation of castration in Ecclesiastical Canons and secular legislation (of the late Roman Empire and Byzantium). Theophylact highlights the ambivalence of the views on eunuchs in Byzantine society, demonstrating that castration as such did not necessarily lead to the marginalization of the castrated individual. The most important part of Theophylact’s Defense offers a comparison between “the bearded” and eunuchs in monastic orders. Also, the affirmation of freedom of choice between good and evil and insisting that an individual should be judged according to his own deeds is the guiding idea of Theophylact’s Defense. The second part of the paper contains a Serbian translation of Theophylact’s text with a commentary. Besides the French translation by the editor of the critical edition P. Gautier, this is the second complete translation of the Greek original. It deviates from Gautier’s version in several places, offering alternative readings of ambiguous places. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 177032: Tradicija, inovacija i identitet u vizantijskom svetu]http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0584-9888/2015/0584-98881552091K.pdfTheophylact of Ohrideunuchmonkoeconomy (οiκονομíα)ecclesiastical and secular legislation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Bulgarian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Krsmanović Bojana Todorović Darko |
spellingShingle |
Krsmanović Bojana Todorović Darko On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I) Zbornik Radova Vizantološkog Instituta Theophylact of Ohrid eunuch monk oeconomy (οiκονομíα) ecclesiastical and secular legislation |
author_facet |
Krsmanović Bojana Todorović Darko |
author_sort |
Krsmanović Bojana |
title |
On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I) |
title_short |
On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I) |
title_full |
On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I) |
title_fullStr |
On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I) |
title_full_unstemmed |
On Theophylact’s in Defense of Eunuchs (I) |
title_sort |
on theophylact’s in defense of eunuchs (i) |
publisher |
Institute for Byzantine Studies of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts |
series |
Zbornik Radova Vizantološkog Instituta |
issn |
0584-9888 2406-0917 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
The first part of this paper analyzes a text by Theophylact of Ohrid known as
In Defense of Eunuchs. In terms of its genre and topic, this work stands
alone in Byzantine literature. Through a dialogue between the two
interlocutors - a monk and a eunuch, Theophylact challenges the traditional
representation of eunuchs. He particularly focuses on the condemnation of
castration in Ecclesiastical Canons and secular legislation (of the late
Roman Empire and Byzantium). Theophylact highlights the ambivalence of the
views on eunuchs in Byzantine society, demonstrating that castration as such
did not necessarily lead to the marginalization of the castrated individual.
The most important part of Theophylact’s Defense offers a comparison between
“the bearded” and eunuchs in monastic orders. Also, the affirmation of
freedom of choice between good and evil and insisting that an individual
should be judged according to his own deeds is the guiding idea of
Theophylact’s Defense. The second part of the paper contains a Serbian
translation of Theophylact’s text with a commentary. Besides the French
translation by the editor of the critical edition P. Gautier, this is the
second complete translation of the Greek original. It deviates from Gautier’s
version in several places, offering alternative readings of ambiguous places.
[Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 177032: Tradicija,
inovacija i identitet u vizantijskom svetu] |
topic |
Theophylact of Ohrid eunuch monk oeconomy (οiκονομíα) ecclesiastical and secular legislation |
url |
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0584-9888/2015/0584-98881552091K.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT krsmanovicbojana ontheophylactsindefenseofeunuchsi AT todorovicdarko ontheophylactsindefenseofeunuchsi |
_version_ |
1725501164073517056 |